Spatial and Ecological Farmer Knowledge and Decision-Making about Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity

Amid climate change, biodiversity loss and food insecurity, there is the growing need to draw synergies between micro-scale environmental processes and practices, and macro-level ecosystem dynamics to facilitate conservation decision-making. Adopting this synergistic approach can improve crop yields and profitability more sustainably, enhance livelihoods and mitigate climate change. Using spatially explicit data generated through a public participatory geographic information system methodology (n = 37), complemented by spatial analysis, interviews (n = 68) and focus group discussions (n = 4), we explored the synergies between participatory farmer-to-farmer agroecology knowledge sharing, farm-level decisions and their links with macro-level prioritization of conservation strategies. We mapped farm conditions and ecosystem services (ES) of two village areas with varying knowledge systems about farming. Results of the farm-level analysis revealed variations in spatial perception among farmers, differences in understanding the dynamics of crop growth and varying priorities for extension services based on agroecological knowledge. The ES use pattern analysis revealed hotspots in the mapped ES indicators with similarities in both village areas. Despite the similarities in ES use, priorities for biodiversity conservation align with farmers’ understanding of farm processes and practices. Farmers with training in agroecology prioritized strategies that are ecologically friendly while farmers with no agroecology training prioritized the use of strict regulations. Importantly, the results show that agroecology can potentially contribute to biodiversity conservation and food security, with climate change mitigation co-benefits. The findings generally contribute to debates on land sparing and land sharing conservation strategies and advance social learning theory as it pertains to acquiring agroecological knowledge for improved yield and a sustainable environment.

[1]  Caru Bowns.  Facilitating the Production of Place-Based Knowledge for Participatory Community Development in Rural Pennsylvania , 2023, Children, Youth and Environments.

[2]  L. Rivers,et al.  Green infrastructure site selection in the Walnut Creek wetland community: A case study from southeast Raleigh, North Carolina , 2020 .

[3]  F. Sottile,et al.  Pathways for the Amplification of Agroecology in African Sustainable Urban Agriculture , 2020, Sustainability.

[4]  Evgenia Micha,et al.  The Complex Pathway towards Farm-Level Sustainable Intensification: An Exploratory Network Analysis of Stakeholders’ Knowledge and Perception , 2020, Sustainability.

[5]  F. Bogner,et al.  The Relation between Knowledge Acquisition and Environmental Values within the Scope of a Biodiversity Learning Module , 2020, Sustainability.

[6]  C. Raymond,et al.  Mapping place values: 10 lessons from two decades of public participation GIS empirical research , 2020 .

[7]  David A. Nipperess,et al.  Conservation prioritization can resolve the flagship species conundrum , 2020, Nature Communications.

[8]  D. Saadallah.  Utilizing participatory mapping and PPGIS to examine the activities of local communities , 2020 .

[9]  Yali Wen,et al.  Spatial Perception of Urban Forests by Citizens Based on Semantic Differences and Cognitive Maps , 2020, Forests.

[10]  Thales A. P. West,et al.  Optimal strategies for ecosystem services provision in Amazonian production forests , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[11]  C. Karakuş,et al.  Evaluation of GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making methods for sanitary landfill site selection: the case of Sivas city, Turkey , 2019, Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management.

[12]  I. Luginaah,et al.  After the flames then what? exploring the linkages between wildfires and household food security in the northern Savannah of Ghana , 2019, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology.

[13]  J. Franks.  An assessment of the landscape-scale dimensions of land based environmental management schemes offered to farmers in England , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[14]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  Lame cows on Australian dairy farms: A comparison of farmer-identified lameness and formal lameness scoring, and the position of lame cows within the milking order. , 2019, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  S. Franzel,et al.  Farmer-To-Farmer Extension: A Low-Cost Approach for Promoting Climate-Smart Agriculture , 2018, The Climate-Smart Agriculture Papers.

[16]  C. Kremen,et al.  Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people , 2018, Science.

[17]  B. Mackey,et al.  The Role of Indigenous and Traditional Knowledge in Ecosystem-Based Adaptation: A Review of the Literature and Case Studies from the Pacific Islands , 2018, Weather, Climate, and Society.

[18]  C. Nicholls,et al.  Pathways for the amplification of agroecology , 2018, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems.

[19]  S. Snapp,et al.  Knowledge politics in participatory climate change adaptation research on agroecology in Malawi , 2018, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[20]  J. Roche,et al.  Economic costs of recorded reasons for cow mortality and culling in a pasture-based dairy industry. , 2018, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  Peter Gaskell,et al.  Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour , 2017 .

[22]  L. L. D. Bruyn,et al.  Lessons Learnt: Sharing Soil Knowledge to Improve Land Management and Sustainable Soil Use , 2017 .

[23]  M. Hansen,et al.  The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013 , 2017, Science Advances.

[24]  J. Messina,et al.  Smallholder Farms and the Potential for Sustainable Intensification , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[25]  U. F. Paleo,et al.  Lost in participation: How local knowledge was overlooked in land use planning and risk governance in Tōhoku, Japan , 2016 .

[26]  C. Ragasa,et al.  The Impact of Agricultural Extension Services in the Context of a Heavily Subsidized Input System: The Case of Malawi , 2016 .

[27]  Isabelle D. Wolf,et al.  The use of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for park visitor management: A case study of mountain biking , 2015 .

[28]  S. Naeem,et al.  The use of farmers' knowledge in coffee agroforestry management: implications for the conservation of tree biodiversity , 2015 .

[29]  M. Honzák,et al.  Analysis of ecosystem services provision in the Colombian Amazon using participatory research and mapping techniques , 2015 .

[30]  Z. Lindo,et al.  Quantifying and mapping ecosystem service use across stakeholder groups: Implications for conservation with priorities for cultural values , 2015 .

[31]  T. P. Johnson,et al.  Conservation Song: A History of Peasant-State Relations and the Environment in Malawi, 1860–2000. By Wapulumuka Oliver Mulwafu , 2015 .

[32]  D. Denuga,et al.  Prospect of Integrating African Indigenous Knowledge Systems into the Teaching of Sciences in Africa , 2015 .

[33]  D. Moyo,et al.  Indigenous knowledge perceptions and development practice in northern Malawi , 2014 .

[34]  S. B. Emery,et al.  Neoliberal Natures on the Farm: Farmer Autonomy and Cooperation in Comparative Perspective , 2014 .

[35]  P. Verburg,et al.  Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape , 2014 .

[36]  Damon R. Lowery,et al.  A Qualitative Method for Collecting Spatial Data on Important Places for Recreation, Livelihoods, and Ecological Meanings: Integrating Focus Groups with Public Participation Geographic Information Systems , 2013 .

[37]  S. B. Emery,et al.  FORUM: Landscape‐scale conservation: collaborative agri‐environment schemes could benefit both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but will farmers be willing to participate? , 2013 .

[38]  Roberto Canavosio-Zuzelski,et al.  A Photogrammetric Approach for Assessing Positional Accuracy of OpenStreetMap© Roads , 2013, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[39]  C. Garforth,et al.  Farmer Experience of Pluralistic Agricultural Extension, Malawi , 2013 .

[40]  Gregory Brown,et al.  Escaping the national forest planning quagmire: using public participation GIS to assess acceptable national forest use , 2013 .

[41]  G. Cundill,et al.  A review of assertions about the processes and outcomes of social learning in natural resource management. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[42]  C. Kremen,et al.  Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on A Social-Ecological Analysis of Diversified Farming Systems: Benefits, Costs, Obstacles, and Enabling Policy Frameworks Ecosystem Services in Biologically Diversified versus Conventional Farming Systems: Benefits, Externalities, and Trade-Offs , 2012 .

[43]  Benjamin Burkhard,et al.  Flood regulating ecosystem services—Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria , 2012 .

[44]  K. Showers.  Conservation Song: A history of peasant–state relations and the environment in Malawi, 1860–2000 , 2012 .

[45]  Patricia Balvanera,et al.  Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review , 2012 .

[46]  L. Jones-Walters,et al.  Biodiversity and stakeholder participation , 2011 .

[47]  Fengyuan Zhong.  Design of Public Participation Geographic Information System for Geologic Hazard Warning , 2011 .

[48]  A. Balmford,et al.  Reconciling Food Production and Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing and Land Sparing Compared , 2011, Science.

[49]  S. Snapp,et al.  Biodiversity can support a greener revolution in Africa , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Bradley D. Parrish,et al.  What is social learning , 2010 .

[51]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[52]  L. Zulu,et al.  The forbidden fuel: Charcoal, urban woodfuel demand and supply dynamics, community forest management and woodfuel policy in Malawi , 2010 .

[53]  G. Foody.  Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices , 2010 .

[54]  Marc Schlossberg,et al.  Participatory Geographic Information Systems and Active Transportation , 2009 .

[55]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[56]  Mark Riley,et al.  Experts in Their Fields: Farmer — Expert Knowledges and Environmentally Friendly Farming Practices , 2008 .

[57]  P. Jeffrey,et al.  A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes , 2008 .

[58]  C. Dunn.  Participatory GIS — a people's GIS? , 2007 .

[59]  Paul Richards,et al.  Sharing seed and knowledge: farmer to farmer dissemination of agroforestry technologies in western Kenya , 2006, Agroforestry Systems.

[60]  M. Eimer.  Multisensory Integration: How Visual Experience Shapes Spatial Perception , 2004, Current Biology.

[61]  Marc Schlossberg,et al.  Delineating "Public" and "Participation" in PPGIS , 2003 .

[62]  B. Marchi.  Public participation and risk governance , 2003 .

[63]  P. Kyem.  Promoting local community participation in forest management through a PPGIS application in Southern Ghana , 2002 .

[64]  Stuart C. Aitken,et al.  Public participation, technological discourses and the scale of GIS , 2002 .

[65]  C. Folke,et al.  REDISCOVERY OF TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AS ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT , 2000 .

[66]  Gregory Brown,et al.  Validation of a Forest Values Typology for Use in National Forest Planning , 2000, Forestry sciences.

[67]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[68]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[69]  G. Hatfield.  The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception from Kant to Helmholtz , 1991 .

[70]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[71]  M. Riley,et al.  Knowledge flows: Farmers’ social relations and knowledge sharing practices in ‘Catchment Sensitive Farming’ , 2020 .

[72]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[73]  N. Miladan,et al.  Land Use Vulnerability towards the Flood Risk in Surakarta City , 2019, MATEC Web of Conferences.

[74]  Ashita Sharma,et al.  Applications of GIS in Management of Water Resources to Attain Zero Hunger , 2019, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering.

[75]  V. S. Quaresma,et al.  Using GIS to Map Priority Areas for Conservation Versus Mineral Exploration: Territorial Sea of Espírito Santo State, Brazil, Study Case , 2019, World Sustainability Series.

[76]  Heather Sangster,et al.  Will farmers work together for conservation? The potential limits of farmers’ cooperation in agri-environment measures , 2018 .

[77]  Benjamin E. Graeub,et al.  Farming Approaches for Greater Biodiversity, Livelihoods, and Food Security. , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[78]  R. Bommarco,et al.  Conservation Biological Control in Agricultural Landscapes , 2017 .

[79]  V. Reyes‐García,et al.  Resilience of traditional knowledge systems: The case of agricultural knowledge in home gardens of the Iberian Peninsula , 2014 .

[80]  Greg Brown,et al.  Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research , 2014 .

[81]  L. Mapemba,et al.  Modeling potential impacts of future climate change in Mzimba District Malawi, 2040-2070: An Integrated Biophysical and Economic Modeling Approach , 2014 .

[82]  S. B. Emery,et al.  Incentivising collaborative conservation: Lessons from existing environmental Stewardship Scheme options , 2013 .

[83]  Christine E. Dunn,et al.  Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’ governance? , 2012 .

[84]  E. Ayiemba.  Population and Housing Census , 2012 .

[85]  N. Nachar.  The Mann ‐ Whitney U: A Test for Assessing Whether Two Independent Samples Come from the Same Distribution , 2007 .

[86]  C. Butler,et al.  Linking future ecosystem services and future human well-being , 2006 .

[87]  R. Kangalawe,et al.  Livelihoods in the wetlands of Kilombero Valley in Tanzania: Opportunities and challenges to integrated water resource management , 2005 .