Can We Detect Cooperators by Looking at Their Face?

Humans are willing to cooperate with each other for mutual benefit—and to accept the risk of exploitation. To avoid collaborating with the wrong person, people sometimes attempt to detect cooperativeness in others’ body language, facial features, and facial expressions. But how reliable are these impressions? We review the literature on the detection of cooperativeness in economic games, from those with protocols that provide a lot of information about players (e.g., through long personal interactions) to those with protocols that provide minimal information (e.g., through the presentation of passport-like pictures). This literature suggests that people can detect cooperativeness with a small but significant degree of accuracy when they have interacted with or watched video clips of other players, but that they have a harder time extracting information from pictures. The conditions under which people can detect cooperation from pictures with better than chance accuracy suggest that successful cooperation detection is supported by purely intuitive processes.

[1]  D. Perrett,et al.  Valid Facial Cues to Cooperation and Trust , 2010, Psychological science.

[2]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Detecting the Trustworthiness of Novel Partners in Economic Exchange , 2012, Psychological science.

[3]  M. Tomasello A Natural History of Human Thinking , 2014 .

[4]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment , 2001 .

[5]  D. Bors,et al.  Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices: Norms for First-Year University Students and the Development of a Short Form , 1998 .

[6]  Astrid Hopfensitz,et al.  Low second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts indiscriminate social suspicion, not improved trustworthiness detection , 2013, Biology Letters.

[7]  Pat Barclay,et al.  We can see inside: Accurate prediction of Prisoner's Dilemma decisions in announced games following a face-to-face interaction , 2016 .

[8]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .

[9]  Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al.  At Face Value , 2021, Bigger Than Life.

[10]  Sven Vanneste,et al.  You can judge a book by its cover: the sequel.: A kernel of truth in predictive cheating detection , 2007 .

[11]  J. Brosig Identifying cooperative behavior: some experimental results in a prisoner's dilemma game , 2002 .

[12]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological , 2022 .

[13]  Jean‐François Bonnefon,et al.  The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Astrid Hopfensitz,et al.  Split-Second Trustworthiness Detection From Faces in an Economic Game , 2017, Experimental psychology.

[15]  Michèle Belot,et al.  Can Observers Predict Trustworthiness? , 2008, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[16]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Can we see inside? Predicting strategic behavior given limited information , 2013 .

[17]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. , 1992 .

[18]  Astrid Hopfensitz,et al.  Face-ism and kernels of truth in facial inferences , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Christopher Y. Olivola,et al.  Response to Bonnefon et al.: Limited ‘kernels of truth’ in facial inferences , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Jonathan Evans Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  T. Groothuis,et al.  Not only states but traits — Humans can identify permanent altruistic dispositions in 20 s , 2010 .

[22]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[23]  Friederike Funk,et al.  Social attributions from faces bias human choices , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Miguel A. Vadillo,et al.  Commentary: Can Ordinary People Detect Deception after All? , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[25]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  You can judge a book by its cover: Evidence that cheaters may look different from cooperators , 2003 .

[26]  Karen L. Schmidt,et al.  Facial expressions as honest signals of cooperative intent in a one-shot anonymous Prisoner's Dilemma game , 2012 .

[27]  C. Faurie,et al.  Is cooperativeness readable in static facial features? An inter-cultural approach , 2013 .

[28]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement , 2015, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Andrew Whiten,et al.  The human socio-cognitive niche and its evolutionary origins , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Astrid Hopfensitz,et al.  Adolescents gradually improve at detecting trustworthiness from the facial features of unknown adults , 2015 .

[31]  Astrid Hopfensitz,et al.  The modular nature of trustworthiness detection. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  Minna Lyons,et al.  The role of Theory of Mind in assessing cooperative intentions , 2012 .

[33]  C. Engel Dictator games: a meta study , 2010 .

[34]  Sonja Vogt,et al.  Viewing men's faces does not lead to accurate predictions of trustworthiness , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[37]  Peter Mende-Siedlecki,et al.  Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  R. Frank,et al.  The evolution of one-shot cooperation: An experiment , 1993 .

[39]  Robert van Rooij,et al.  The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure , 2007, Stud Logica.