Are Virtual Particles Less Real?

The question of whether virtual quantum particles exist is considered here in light of previous critical analysis and under the assumption that there are particles in the world as described by quantum field theory. The relationship of the classification of particles to quantum-field-theoretic calculations and the diagrammatic aids that are often used in them is clarified. It is pointed out that the distinction between virtual particles and others and, therefore, judgments regarding their reality have been made on basis of these methods rather than on their physical characteristics. As such, it has obscured the question of their existence. It is here argued that the most influential arguments against the existence of virtual particles but not other particles fail because they either are arguments against the existence of particles in general rather than virtual particles per se, or are dependent on the imposition of classical intuitions on quantum systems, or are simply beside the point. Several reasons are then provided for considering virtual particles real, such as their descriptive, explanatory, and predictive value, and a clearer characterization of virtuality—one in terms of intermediate states—that also applies beyond perturbation theory is provided. It is also pointed out that in the role of force mediators, they serve to preclude action-at-a-distance between interacting particles. For these reasons, it is concluded that virtual particles are as real as other quantum particles.

[1]  Matthew D. Schwartz,et al.  Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model , 2013 .

[2]  Boris Lemmer,et al.  The Double Slit Experiment , 2016 .

[3]  C. Vafa,et al.  Advanced Quantum Mechanics , 2012 .

[4]  Richard Phillips Feynman,et al.  The Theory Of Fundamental Processes , 1961 .

[5]  Gregg S. Jaeger,et al.  Developments in Quantum Probability and the Copenhagen Approach , 2018, Entropy.

[6]  Markus Schweizer,et al.  The Particle Hunters , 2016 .

[7]  M. Valente Conceptual problems in quantum electrodynamics: a contemporary historico-philosophical approach , 2011 .

[8]  M. Thomson Modern Particle Physics , 2013 .

[9]  Anthony J. G. Hey,et al.  Gauge theories in particle physics , 1984 .

[10]  R. Shaw,et al.  Unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group , 1964 .

[11]  F. Wilczek Unification of Fundamental Forces , 1979 .

[12]  Arkady Plotnitsky The Principles of Quantum Theory, From Planck's Quanta to the Higgs Boson , 2016 .

[13]  Paul Busch,et al.  Complementarity and Uncertainty in Mach-Zehnder Interferometry and beyond , 2006, quant-ph/0609048.

[14]  Gerard 't Hooft In Search of the Ultimate Building Blocks , 1996 .

[15]  John Archibald Wheeler,et al.  The “Past” and the “Delayed-Choice” Double-Slit Experiment , 1978 .

[16]  Paul Teller,et al.  An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory , 1994 .

[17]  D. J. Baker,et al.  Against Field Interpretations of Quantum Field Theory , 2009, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[18]  Mehdi Golshani,et al.  Quantum Objects , 2013, 1305.6940.

[19]  H. Lüders,et al.  Comments , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  M. Valente Are Virtual Quanta Nothing but Formal Tools? , 2011 .

[21]  Paul Busch,et al.  Unsharp Quantum Reality , 2010, 1005.0604.

[22]  Alan D. Martin,et al.  Quarks and Leptons: An Introductory Course in Modern Particle Physics , 1984 .

[23]  Letitia Meynell Picturing Feynman Diagrams and the Epistemology of Understanding , 2018, Perspectives on Science.

[24]  How to Observe Quarks , 2000 .

[25]  P. H. Andersen,et al.  The Birth of Particle Physics , 1986 .

[26]  Tobias Fox Haunted by the Spectre of Virtual Particles: A Philosophical Reconsideration , 2008 .

[27]  Letitia Meynell Why Feynman Diagrams Represent , 2008 .