A Modest Proposal: How We might change the Process and Product of Managerial Research

The article focuses on possible changes in the discipline of management science, and how the methodology and presentation of its research might be improved. The main goals of management science sch...

[1]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  Publishing as Prostitution? – Choosing Between One's Own Ideas and Academic Success , 2003 .

[2]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  PEER REVIEW IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES: PREVALENCE AND EFFECTS OF REVIEWER HOSTILITY, BIAS, AND DISSENSUS , 2006 .

[3]  F. Vermeulen “I Shall Not Remain Insignificant”: Adding a Second Loop to Matter More , 2007 .

[4]  A. Tahai,et al.  A revealed preference study of management journals' direct influences , 1999 .

[5]  Fang-Shu Ou,et al.  Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, JAMA.

[6]  Ian Hulatt What's the big idea? , 1997, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[7]  S. Stewman Organizational demography. , 1988, Annual review of sociology.

[8]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  Good Reasons Sell: Reason - Based Choice Among Group and Individual Investors in the Stock Market , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[9]  D. Hambrick THE FIELD OF MANAGEMENT'S DEVOTION TO THEORY: TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING? , 2007 .

[10]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s , 2005 .

[11]  T. Judge,et al.  What Causes a Management Article to be Cited—Article, Author, or Journal? , 2007 .

[12]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  PUBLICATION BIAS: A CASE STUDY OF FOUR TEST VENDORS , 2006 .

[13]  S. Ceci,et al.  Peer review--a study of reliability. , 1982, Change.

[14]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  M. Porter The Structure Within Industries and Companies' Performance , 1979 .

[16]  Steve Mirsky,et al.  What's the Big Idea? , 2007 .

[17]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[18]  Kwok Leung,et al.  The Glory and Tyranny of Citation Impact: An East Asian Perspective , 2007 .

[19]  Guang Yu,et al.  The influence of publication delays on impact factors , 2005, Scientometrics.

[20]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[21]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[22]  J. Colquitt,et al.  TRENDS IN THEORY BUILDING AND THEORY TESTING: A FIVE-DECADE STUDY OF THE ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL , 2007 .

[23]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Making a life in the field of organization science , 2007 .

[24]  Christina T. Fong,et al.  The End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye , 2002 .

[25]  B. Bass LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 1985 .

[26]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Social Issues and Management: Our Lost Cause Found , 2003 .

[27]  Leonard D. Goodstein,et al.  Psychology of Scientist: XXX. Credibility of Psychologists: An Empirical Study , 1970 .

[28]  Miguel Campanario,et al.  Consolation for the Scientist: Sometimes it is Hard to Publish Papers that are Later Highly-Cited , 1993 .

[29]  S. Krimsky,et al.  University, Inc: The Corporate Corruption of Higher Education , 2005 .

[30]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[31]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  How Much Better are the Most Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[32]  T. Kuhn The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[33]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Is there Such a thing as “Evidence-Based Management”? , 2006 .

[34]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[35]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[36]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  1993 presidential address: What if the academy actually mattered? , 1994 .

[37]  Adrian Bangerter,et al.  The Mozart effect: tracking the evolution of a scientific legend. , 2004, The British journal of social psychology.

[38]  M. Mahoney Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system , 1977, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[39]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Publication Bias against Null Results , 1997 .

[40]  J. Pfeffer Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable , 1993 .

[41]  D. Guest Don't Shoot the Messenger: A Wake-Up Call for Academics , 2007 .

[42]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Knowledge for Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[43]  Ed Cohen,et al.  What Business Needs from Business Schools , 2009 .

[44]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Theory of the Firm , 1976 .

[45]  Kenneth G. Brown,et al.  The Very Separate Worlds Of Academic And Practitioner Periodicals In Human Resource Management: Implications For Evidence-Based Management , 2007 .

[46]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  Turning Lemons into Lemonade , 2003 .

[47]  Chip Heath,et al.  Idea Habitats: How the Prevalence of Environmental Cues Influences the Success of Ideas , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[48]  B. Loasby The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[49]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[50]  O. Williamson Markets and Hierarchies , 1975 .

[51]  James Surowiecki The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[52]  W. Rosenberg,et al.  Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving , 1995, BMJ.

[53]  D. Bergh Thinking Strategically about Contribution , 2003 .

[54]  Mark A. Mone,et al.  The Uniqueness Value and its Consequences for Organization Studies , 1993 .

[55]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Evidence-based management. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[56]  J. Kam Ring a Ring O' Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies , 2007 .

[57]  Sara L. Rynes,et al.  “Getting on Board” with AMJ: Balancing Quality and Innovation in the Review Process , 2006 .

[58]  Daniel R. Ilgen Citations to Management Articles: Cautions for the Science About Advice for the Scientist , 2007 .

[59]  J. S. Gibson,et al.  Getting on Board , 2007 .

[60]  D. Eden Replication, Meta-Analysis, Scientific Progress, and AMJ's Publication Policy , 2002 .

[61]  J. Pearce What Do We Know and How Do We Really Know It , 2004 .