Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods

PURPOSE: Recent reports have suggested that precolonoscopy bowel preparation is easier to tolerate if a small volume solution is used. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare three oral solutions for colonoscopy to determine any changes in either patient compliance or cleansing ability. METHODS: Four hundred fifty patients were prospectively randomized to receive either a standard 4-liter polyethylene glycol solution, a newer sulfatefree 4-liter polyethylene giycol solution, or a 90-ml oral sodium phosphate preparation. Before and after bowel preparation all patients were weighed, and serum electrolytes as well as phosphate, magnesium, calcium, and osmolarity were measured. In addition, a detailed questionnaire was used to assess side effects and patient satisfaction. Endoscopists blinded to the type and quantity of preparation used scored the type of residual stool and the percentage of bowel wall visualized for each segment of colon and for the overall examination. Nurses recorded all procedure times as well as the quantity of irrigation and aspiration. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-two agematched and sex-matched patients completed all phases of the trial. There were no clinically significant changes in weight or in any biochemical parameters. There was, however, asymptomatic hyperphosphatemia in the sodium phosphate group (P<0.01).The length of time to the cecum was similar for all three groups, with a higher volume of fluid suctioned for sodium phosphate (P< 0.01).Overall, endoscopists scored sodium phosphate as “excellent” or “good” in 90 percentvs.70 percent and 73 percent after the polyethylene glycol or sulfate-free lavage, respectively (P<0.01). Paniculate or solid stool was found in all segments of the colon more frequently after both large volume preparations than after sodium phosphate (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the frequency or intensity of any of the 11 side effects questioned. Eighty-three percent of the patients who received the sodium phosphate preparation stated they would take this same preparation again,vs.only 19 percent and 33 percent for polyethylene glycol and the sulfate-free lavage, respectively (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The smaller volume oral sodium phosphate was not associated with any clinically significant problem, caused no increase in the incidence of side effects, was preferred by patients, and was more effective in colonic cleansing. However, the hyperphosphatemia seen may limit its use in patients with impaired renal function.

[1]  K. Foord.  Oral mannitol as a preparation for double contrast barium enema. , 1982, Clinical radiology.

[2]  J. Fordtran,et al.  Volume-Flow Relationship During the Transport of Fluid Through the Human Small Intestine , 1965 .

[3]  D. Winship,et al.  Comparison of intragastric infusion with conventional mechanical bowel preparation , 1981, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[4]  W G Paterson,et al.  A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. , 1990, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[5]  J. Dipiro,et al.  Whole-bowel irrigation for mechanical colon cleansing. , 1985, Clinical pharmacy.

[6]  M. Keighley,et al.  Modification of the physiological disturbances produced by whole gut irrigation by preliminary mannitol administration , 1980, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  D. King,et al.  An alternative method of bowel preparation for barium enemas. , 1979, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  J. Fordtran,et al.  A low-sodium solution for gastrointestinal lavage. , 1990, Gastroenterology.

[9]  J. Rigby,et al.  Whole-gut irrigation in preparation for large-bowel surgery. , 1973, Lancet.

[10]  M. Keighley,et al.  Comparison of three methods of whole bowel irrigation. , 1980, American journal of surgery.

[11]  S. Kadakia,et al.  Serum electrolyte, mineral, and blood pH changes after phosphate enema, water enema, and electrolyte lavage solution enema for flexible sigmoidoscopy. , 1992, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[12]  G. Arapakis,et al.  Bowel preparation and the risk of explosion during colonoscopic polypectomy. , 1984, Gut.

[13]  M. Keighley,et al.  Failure of antimicrobial prophylaxis with cefoxitin, or metronidazole and gentamicin in colorectal surgery. Is mannitol to blame? , 1981, The Journal of hospital infection.

[14]  E. Bourke,et al.  Effect of preparation for colonoscopy on fluid and electrolyte balance. , 1978, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[15]  J. Marshall,et al.  Short report: prospective, randomized trial comparing a single dose sodium phosphate regimen with PEG–electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation , 1993, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[16]  J. Fordtran,et al.  Inhibition of water and electrolyte absorption by polyethylene glycol (PEG). , 1980, Gastroenterology.

[17]  A. Van Gossum,et al.  Whole gut lavage for colonoscopy--a comparison between two solutions. , 1984, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[18]  R. Moffat,et al.  Oral electrolyte overload to cleanse the colon for colonoscopy. , 1977, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[19]  J. Marshall,et al.  A randomized blinded clinical trial of a rapid colonic lavage solution (Golytely) compared with standard preparation for colonoscopy and barium enema. , 1983, Gastroenterology.

[20]  J. Marshall,et al.  Comparison of a new sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution versus a standard solution for colonoscopy cleansing. , 1990, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[21]  J. Fordtran,et al.  Interrelationships of chloride, bicarbonate, sodium, and hydrogen transport in the human ileum. , 1970, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[22]  A. Love,et al.  Water and sodium absorption in the human intestine , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  T. H. McConnell.  Fatal hypocalcemia from phosphate absorption from laxative preparation. , 1971, JAMA.

[24]  D. Youngs,et al.  Influence of oral mannitol bowel preparation on colonic microflora and the risk of explosion during endoscopic diathermy , 1981, The British journal of surgery.

[25]  D. E. Abrams,et al.  Hypocalcemic tetany due to sodium phosphate ingestion in acute renal failure. , 1975, Nephron.

[26]  M. Reichelderfer,et al.  Evaluation of rapid colonoscopy preparation using a new gut lavage solution. , 1982, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[27]  H. Fischer,et al.  Whole-gut irrigation as a means of cleaning the colon. , 1976, Radiology.

[28]  J. Fordtran,et al.  Development of a lavage solution associated with minimal water and electrolyte absorption or secretion , 1980 .

[29]  J. Rhodes,et al.  Metoclopramide reduces the distress associated with colon cleansing by an oral electrolyte overload. , 1978, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.