Symmetry-Breaking as a Paradigm to Design Highly-Sensitive Sensor Systems

A large class of dynamic sensors have nonlinear input-output characteristics, often corresponding to a bistable potential energy function that controls the evolution of the sensor dynamics. These sensors include magnetic field sensors, e.g., the simple fluxgate magnetometer and the superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID), ferroelectric sensors and mechanical sensors, e.g., acoustic transducers, made with piezoelectric materials. Recently, the possibilities offered by new technologies and materials in realizing miniaturized devices with improved performance have led to renewed interest in a new generation of inexpensive, compact and low-power fluxgate magnetometers and electric-field sensors. In this article, we review the analysis of an alternative approach: a symmetry-based design for highly-sensitive sensor systems. The design incorporates a network architecture that produces collective oscillations induced by the coupling topology, i.e., which sensors are coupled to each other. Under certain symmetry groups, the oscillations in the network emerge via an infinite-period bifurcation, so that at birth, they exhibit a very large period of oscillation. This characteristic renders the oscillatory wave highly sensitive to symmetry-breaking effects, thus leading to a new detection mechanism. Model equations and bifurcation analysis are discussed in great detail. Results from experimental works on networks of fluxgate magnetometers are also included.

[1]  Pavel Ripka,et al.  New directions in fluxgate sensors , 2000 .

[2]  鈴木 増雄 Time-Dependent Statistics of the Ising Model , 1965 .

[3]  Pavel Ripka,et al.  Advances in fluxgate sensors , 2003 .

[4]  Gábor Vértesy,et al.  High sensitivity magnetic field sensor , 2000 .

[5]  Visarath In,et al.  Dynamics, Bifurcations and Normal Forms in Arrays of Magnetostrictive Energy Harvesters with All-to-All Coupling , 2015, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[6]  Martin Golubitsky,et al.  Heteroclinic cycles in rings of coupled cells , 2000 .

[7]  Juan P. Torres Emergent oscillations in unidirectionally coupled overdamped bistable systems , 2004 .

[8]  F. Primdahl,et al.  Temperature compensation of fluxgate magnetometers , 1970 .

[9]  Roland Pease,et al.  Magnetic materials , 2018, Nature.

[10]  Visarath In,et al.  Coupled-core fluxgate magnetometer: Novel configuration scheme and the effects of a noise-contaminated external signal , 2007 .

[11]  Bruno Ando,et al.  Coupling-induced cooperative behaviour in dynamic ferromagnetic cores in the presence of a noise floor , 2006 .

[12]  Roger Hilsen Koch,et al.  Fundamental limits to magnetic-field sensitivity of flux-gate magnetic-field sensors , 1999 .

[13]  Melbourne,et al.  Asymptotic stability of heteroclinic cycles in systems with symmetry , 1995, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems.

[14]  Martin Golubitsky,et al.  Heteroclinic cycles involving periodic solutions in mode interactions with O(2) symmetry , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics.

[15]  T. Lukes Space Correlation and Energy Levels in an Einstein Solid dagger , 1961 .

[16]  Martin Krupa,et al.  Bifurcations of relative equilibria , 1990 .

[17]  M. Field Lectures on bifurcations, dynamics and symmetry , 1996 .

[18]  Pavel Ripka,et al.  Review of fluxgate sensors , 1992 .

[19]  D. Gordon,et al.  Recent advances in fluxgate magnetometry , 1972 .

[20]  A. Palacios,et al.  A drive-free vibratory gyroscope. , 2011, Chaos.

[21]  P. Holmes,et al.  Structurally stable heteroclinic cycles , 1988, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[22]  Michael Dellnitz,et al.  Cycling chaos , 1995 .

[23]  Dynamics and bifurcations in a Dn-symmetric Hamiltonian network. Application to coupled gyroscopes , 2015 .

[24]  J. Lenz A review of magnetic sensors , 1990, Proc. IEEE.

[25]  Bruno Ando,et al.  Complex behavior in driven unidirectionally coupled overdamped Duffing elements. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Daniel Lyons,et al.  Geometry of Basins of Attraction and Heteroclinic Connections in Coupled Bistable Systems , 2014, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[27]  Visarath In,et al.  Collective Behavior of a Coupled gyroscope System with Coupling along the Driving- and Sensing-Modes , 2013, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[28]  A. Palacios,et al.  Coupling-induced oscillations in overdamped bistable systems. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  Michael Field,et al.  Equivariant dynamical systems , 1970 .

[30]  F Primdahl Bibliography of fluxgate magnetometers , 1972 .

[31]  A magnetometer for the pioneer venus orbiter , 1977 .

[32]  H. Stanley,et al.  Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , 1972 .

[33]  M. Krupa Robust heteroclinic cycles , 1997 .

[34]  C. Russell,et al.  Initial Pioneer Venus Magnetic Field Results: Dayside Observations , 1979, Science.

[35]  G. Bertotti,et al.  hysteresis in magnetism (electromagnetism) , 1998 .

[36]  Visarath In,et al.  Two-time-scale analysis of a ring of coupled vibratory gyroscopes. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[37]  Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynamical systems - a guide to XPPAUT for researchers and students , 2002, Software, environments, tools.

[38]  Pavel Ripka,et al.  Noise and stability of magnetic sensors , 1996 .