Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters

The paper addresses two related questions: whether the principle that nominal arguments must be projections of D, apparently holding in many Romance languages, holds in English and in other languages as well; and why such a principle should exist at all. The answer empirically suggested to the first question is that the principle does hold in English, contrary to Chierchia (1998) and supporting the N-movement approach to the nominal Romance-Germanic parametrization proposed by Longobardi (1996), but that certain other languages, specifically Japanese, are likely to exhibit nominal arguments without D, as expected in Chierchia’s (1998) framework. Following the restrictive approach to phrase structure proposed by Chomsky (1995, ch 4.), the second question will be addressed by identifying D with the Person head and by arguing that the latter feature is crucial to allow type-shifting from property- to individual-denotation. Under a minimalist theory of parameter formats, it will be argued that all the three possible polymorphic realizations of the feature Person admitted by such a theory are crosslinguistically instantiated, precisely by Japanese, English, and Italian.

[1]  Jongil Kwon,et al.  TOPICS IN THE SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS OF , 2009 .

[2]  Giuseppe Longobardi,et al.  A minimalist program for parametric linguistics , 2006 .

[3]  G. Longobardi,et al.  The underlying unity of Reference and Quantification , 2006 .

[4]  Giuseppe Longobardi,et al.  Toward a Unified Grammar of Reference , 2005 .

[5]  Hagit Borer,et al.  Structuring Sense: Volume I: In Name Only , 2005 .

[6]  Cristina Guardiano,et al.  Historical implications of a formal theory of syntactic variation , 2004 .

[7]  A. F. Fehri Nominal classes, reference, and functional parameters, with particular reference to Arabic , 2004 .

[8]  Christer Platzack,et al.  Agreement and the Person Phrase hypothesis , 2004 .

[9]  Hajime Hoji,et al.  What Gets Mapped to the Tripartite Structure of Quantification in , 2004 .

[10]  Giuseppe Longobardi,et al.  Methods in parametric linguistics and cognitive history , 2003 .

[11]  P. Rutkowski Noun/pronoun asymmetries: Evidence in support of the DP hypothesis in Polish , 2002 .

[12]  G. Longobardi How Comparative is Semantics? A Unified ParametricTheory of Bare Nouns and Proper Names , 2001 .

[13]  Mark C. Baker The Atoms of Language , 1987 .

[14]  S. Kennison Reference and proper names : A theory of N-movement in syntax and Logical Form , 2001 .

[15]  Richard S. Kayne Parameters and universals , 2000 .

[16]  Danny Fox,et al.  Economy and Semantic Interpretation , 1999 .

[17]  H. Borer Deconstructing the Construct , 1999 .

[18]  Paola Crisma Nominals without the article in the Germanic languages , 1999 .

[19]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Reference to Kinds across Language , 1998 .

[20]  Cheng-Teh James Huang,et al.  Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar , 1998 .

[21]  Ljiljana Progovac,et al.  Determiner phrase in a language without determiners (with apologies to Jim Huang 1982) , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[22]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[23]  Tal Siloni Noun Phrases and Nominalizations , 1997 .

[24]  Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin The syntax of Romanian : comparative studies in Romance , 1994 .

[25]  Judy B. Bernstein The syntactic role of word markers in null nominal constructions , 1993 .

[26]  Maria Luisa Zubizarreta,et al.  The definitive determiner and the inalienable constructions in French and in English , 1992 .

[27]  Elizabeth Ritter,et al.  Two functional categories in Noun Phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew , 1991 .

[28]  Jacob Hoeksema,et al.  TOPICS IN THE SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS OF INFINITIVES AND GERUNDS - CHIERCHIA,G , 1991 .

[29]  T. Stowell Determiners in NP and DP , 1991 .

[30]  Anna Bartra i Kaufmann Reflexions sobre els pronoms febles predicatius , 1989 .

[31]  S. Kuroda Whether We Agree or Not: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese , 1988 .

[32]  Anna Szabolcsi Functional categories in the noun phrase , 1987 .

[33]  Heles Contreras,et al.  Spanish bare NPs and the ECP , 1986 .

[34]  Anna Bartra 'Ho', predicat i argument , 1986 .

[35]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[36]  H. Vairel Le problème de la « personne » (particulièrement en latin). À propos de l'article de E. Benveniste, Structure des relations de personne dans le verbe , 1979 .

[37]  Greg Carlson,et al.  A unified analysis of the English bare plural , 1977 .