On Temporal Scale Separation in Coupled Data Assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter

Data assimilation for systems possessing many scales of motions is a substantial methodological and technological challenge. Systems with these features are found in many areas of computational physics and are becoming common thanks to increased computational power allowing to resolve finer scales and to couple together several sub-components. Coupled data assimilation (CDA) distinctively appears as a main concern in numerical weather and climate prediction with major efforts put forward by meteo services worldwide. The core issue is the scale separation acting as a barrier that hampers the propagation of the information across model components (e.g. ocean and atmosphere). We provide a brief survey of CDA, and then focus on CDA using the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), a widely used Monte Carlo Gaussian method. Our goal is to elucidate the mechanisms behind information propagation across model components. We consider first a coupled system of equations with temporal scale difference, and deduce that: (i) cross components effects are strong from the slow to the fast scale, but, (ii) intra-component effects are much stronger in the fast scale. While observing the slow scale is desirable and benefits the fast, the latter must be observed with high frequency otherwise the error will grow up to affect the slow scale. Numerical experiments are performed using the atmosphere-ocean model, MAOOAM. Six configurations are considered, differing for the strength of the atmosphere-ocean coupling and/or the number of model modes. The performance of the EnKF depends on the model configuration, i.e. on its dynamical features. A comprehensive dynamical characterisation of the model configurations is provided by examining the Lyapunov spectrum, Kolmogorov entropy and Kaplan–Yorke attractor dimension. We also compute the covariant Lyapunov vectors and use them to explain how model instabilities act on different model’s modes according to the coupling strength. The experiments confirm the importance of observing the fast scale, but show also that, despite its slow temporal scale, frequent observations in the ocean are beneficial. The relation between the ensemble size, N , and the unstable subspace dimension, $$n_0$$ n 0 , has been studied. Results largely ratify what known for uncoupled system: the condition $$N\ge n_0$$ N ≥ n 0 is necessary for the EnKF to work satisfactorily. Nevertheless the quasi-degeneracy of the Lyapunov spectrum of MAOOAM, with many near-zero exponents, is potentially the cause of the smooth gradual reduction of the analysis error observed for some model configurations, even when $$N>n_0$$ N > n 0 . Future prospects for the EnKF in the context of coupled ocean-atmosphere systems are finally discussed.

[1]  Nancy Nichols,et al.  Estimating Forecast Error Covariances for Strongly Coupled Atmosphere–Ocean 4D-Var Data Assimilation , 2017 .

[2]  Casey O Diekman,et al.  Data Assimilation Methods for Neuronal State and Parameter Estimation , 2018, The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience.

[3]  Alberto Carrassi,et al.  Adaptive observations and assimilation in the unstable subspace by breeding on the data-assimilation system , 2007 .

[4]  V. Lucarini,et al.  A new mathematical framework for atmospheric blocking events , 2019, Climate Dynamics.

[5]  Toru Miyama,et al.  Development of a four‐dimensional variational coupled data assimilation system for enhanced analysis and prediction of seasonal to interannual climate variations , 2008 .

[6]  Jonathan Demaeyer,et al.  The Modular Arbitrary-Order Ocean-Atmosphere Model: MAOOAM v1.0 , 2016, 1603.06755.

[7]  Nancy Nichols,et al.  Treating Sample Covariances for Use in Strongly Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean Data Assimilation , 2018 .

[8]  G. Benettin,et al.  Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for hamiltonian systems; a method for computing all of them. Part 1: Theory , 1980 .

[9]  Uang,et al.  The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis , 2010 .

[10]  C. Lupu,et al.  CERA-SAT: A coupled satellite-era reanalysis , 2018 .

[11]  M. Rodwell,et al.  Toward Seamless Prediction: Calibration of Climate Change Projections Using Seasonal Forecasts , 2008 .

[12]  Mark Buehner,et al.  Coupled Data Assimilation for Integrated Earth System Analysis and Prediction: Goals, Challenges, and Recommendations , 2017 .

[13]  M. Zupanski,et al.  Data Assimilation for Coupled Modeling Systems , 2017 .

[14]  Joaq,et al.  Data assimilation in a system with two scales — combining two initialization techniques , 2008 .

[15]  Valerio Lucarini,et al.  Statistical and dynamical properties of covariant lyapunov vectors in a coupled atmosphere-ocean model—multiscale effects, geometric degeneracy, and error dynamics , 2015, 1510.00298.

[16]  Stephen G. Penny,et al.  Coupled Data Assimilation for Integrated Earth System Analysis and Prediction: Goals, Challenges, and Recommendations , 2017 .

[17]  Mw Hirsch,et al.  Chaos In Dynamical Systems , 2016 .

[18]  Marc Bocquet,et al.  Expanding the validity of the ensemble Kalman filter without the intrinsic need for inflation , 2015 .

[19]  S. Vannitsem The role of the ocean mixed layer on the development of the North Atlantic Oscillation: A dynamical system's perspective , 2015 .

[20]  G. Froyland,et al.  Computing covariant Lyapunov vectors, Oseledets vectors, and dichotomy projectors: A comparative numerical study , 2012, 1204.0871.

[21]  Gregory J. Hakim,et al.  Coupled atmosphere–ocean data assimilation experiments with a low-order model and CMIP5 model data , 2015, Climate Dynamics.

[22]  Sandro Rambaldi,et al.  Nonlinear stability of traffic models and the use of Lyapunov vectors for estimating the traffic state. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  H. Chaté,et al.  Characterizing dynamics with covariant Lyapunov vectors. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[24]  Jun Wang,et al.  Impact of Atmospheric and Aerosol Optical Depth Observations on Aerosol Initial Conditions in a strongly-coupled data assimilation system , 2019 .

[25]  Gregory J. Hakim,et al.  Assimilation of time-averaged observations in a quasi-geostrophic atmospheric jet model , 2010 .

[26]  A. Carrassi,et al.  Four-dimensional ensemble variational data assimilation and the unstable subspace , 2017 .

[27]  Dusanka Zupanski,et al.  The maximum likelihood ensemble filter performances in chaotic systems , 2008 .

[28]  Andrew C. Lorenc,et al.  4D‐Var and the butterfly effect: Statistical four‐dimensional data assimilation for a wide range of scales , 2007 .

[29]  P. Naveau,et al.  DADA: data assimilation for the detection and attribution of weather and climate-related events , 2015, Climatic Change.

[30]  Seon Ki Park,et al.  Structure of forecast error covariance in coupled atmosphere–chemistry data assimilation , 2015 .

[31]  Daniel Margoliash,et al.  Nonlinear statistical data assimilation for HVCRA neurons in the avian song system , 2016, Biol. Cybern..

[32]  Anna Trevisan,et al.  Periodic Orbits, Lyapunov Vectors, and Singular Vectors in the Lorenz System , 1998 .

[33]  Istvan Szunyogh,et al.  Efficient data assimilation for spatiotemporal chaos: A local ensemble transform Kalman filter , 2005, physics/0511236.

[34]  Alberto Carrassi,et al.  Lyapunov vectors and assimilation in the unstable subspace: theory and applications , 2013 .

[35]  Marc Bocquet,et al.  Data Assimilation: Methods, Algorithms, and Applications , 2016 .

[36]  Marc Bocquet,et al.  Ensemble Kalman filtering without the intrinsic need for inflation , 2011 .

[37]  A. Lorenc,et al.  Collaboration of the Weather and Climate Communities to Advance Subseasonal-to-Seasonal Prediction , 2010 .

[38]  Lai-Sang Young,et al.  Ergodic Theory of Differentiable Dynamical Systems , 1995 .

[39]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors , 1985 .

[40]  M. Zupanski Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter: Theoretical Aspects , 2005 .

[41]  G. Evensen,et al.  Data assimilation in the geosciences: An overview of methods, issues, and perspectives , 2017, WIREs Climate Change.

[42]  Kristian Mogensen,et al.  A coupled data assimilation system for climate reanalysis , 2016 .

[43]  Feiyu Lu,et al.  Strongly Coupled Data Assimilation Using Leading Averaged Coupled Covariance (LACC). Part I: Simple Model Study* , 2015 .

[44]  Colin Grudzien,et al.  Asymptotic Forecast Uncertainty and the Unstable Subspace in the Presence of Additive Model Error , 2017, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantification.

[45]  N. Keenlyside,et al.  Seasonal-to-decadal predictions with the ensemble Kalman filter and the Norwegian Earth System Model: a twin experiment , 2014 .

[46]  Amos S. Lawless,et al.  Exploring strategies for coupled 4D-Var data assimilation using an idealised atmosphere–ocean model , 2015 .

[47]  Hans Wackernagel,et al.  Geir Evensen: Data Assimilation—The Ensemble Kalman Filter, 2nd edn , 2010 .

[48]  A case study involving single observation experiments performed over snowy Siberia using a coupled atmosphere‐land modelling system , 2017 .

[49]  R. Samelson,et al.  An efficient method for recovering Lyapunov vectors from singular vectors , 2007 .

[50]  G. Evensen Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2006 .

[51]  Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes,et al.  Seasonal climate predictability and forecasting: status and prospects , 2013 .

[52]  Peter R. Oke,et al.  TOPAZ4: an ocean-sea ice data assimilation system for the North Atlantic and Arctic , 2012 .

[53]  Nancy Nichols,et al.  On the representation error in data assimilation , 2018 .

[54]  Gregory J. Hakim,et al.  Coupled atmosphere–ocean data assimilation experiments with a low-order climate model , 2014, Climate Dynamics.

[55]  Roland Potthast,et al.  Editorial: Data Assimilation and Control: Theory and Applications in Life Sciences , 2019, Front. Appl. Math. Stat..

[56]  R. Vautard,et al.  A GUIDE TO LIAPUNOV VECTORS , 2022 .

[57]  Andrew J. Majda,et al.  Filtering Turbulent Sparsely Observed Geophysical Flows , 2010 .

[58]  C. Grudzien,et al.  Chaotic dynamics and the role of covariance inflation for reduced rank Kalman filters with model error , 2018, Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics.

[59]  Paul Poli,et al.  CERA‐20C: A Coupled Reanalysis of the Twentieth Century , 2018 .

[60]  A. Rosati,et al.  System Design and Evaluation of Coupled Ensemble Data Assimilation for Global Oceanic Climate Studies , 2007 .

[61]  T. Yoshida,et al.  Strongly Coupled Data Assimilation in Multiscale Media: Experiments Using a Quasi‐Geostrophic Coupled Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[62]  Andrew Bennett,et al.  Weakly Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Data Assimilation in the ECMWF NWP System , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[63]  E. Kalnay,et al.  Local Atmosphere–Ocean Predictability: Dynamical Origins, Lead Times, and Seasonality , 2019, Journal of Climate.

[64]  M. Bocquet,et al.  A low-order coupled chemistry meteorology model for testing online and offline data assimilation schemes: L95-GRS (v1.0) , 2016 .

[65]  Daniel Margoliash,et al.  Nonlinear statistical data assimilation for HVC$$_{\mathrm{RA}}$$RA neurons in the avian song system , 2016, Biological Cybernetics.

[66]  S. Vannitsem,et al.  Low-frequency variability and heat transport in a low-order nonlinear coupled ocean–atmosphere model , 2014, 1412.0621.

[67]  V. Kitsios,et al.  Application of local attractor dimension to reduced space strongly coupled data assimilation for chaotic multiscale systems , 2019 .

[68]  S. Vannitsem,et al.  Exploring the Lyapunov instability properties of high-dimensional atmospheric and climate models , 2017, Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics.

[69]  Ulrich Parlitz,et al.  Theory and Computation of Covariant Lyapunov Vectors , 2011, Journal of Nonlinear Science.

[70]  Juan M. López,et al.  Spatio-temporal evolution of perturbations in ensembles initialized by bred, Lyapunov and singular vectors , 2010 .

[71]  Stephen G. Penny,et al.  Assimilating atmospheric observations into the ocean using strongly coupled ensemble data assimilation , 2016 .

[72]  E. Ott Chaos in Dynamical Systems: Contents , 2002 .

[73]  Gregory J. Hakim,et al.  Toward the assimilation of time‐averaged observations , 2005 .