Process analysis and optimisation of hybrid processes for the dehydration of ethanol

Abstract Promising hybrid processes for ethanol dewatering consist of different combinations of distillation with adsorption and/or vapour permeation. This paper presents an analysis and optimisation of these hybrid processes using non-equilibrium models and an evolutionary algorithm. Four different membrane assisted configurations are compared with a benchmark process consisting of distillation and pressure swing adsorption. In total 12 cases were investigated while assuming different feed and product compositions at different production capacities: three ethanol mass fractions in feed 45, 80, 92 wt.%, two product purities 99.6, 99.95 wt.% and two production capacities 25,000, 250,000 m 3 /year. The influence of decisive operating and structural variables on important target variables such as total membrane area is demonstrated. Finally, the processes are evaluated regarding operating costs and energy consumption depending on product purity and production capacity. The operating costs of the membrane assisted configurations differ only in a small range of −3% to 6% from those of the benchmark. The energy consumption of the membrane assisted configurations without distillation is up to 30% lower compared to the benchmark. Especially the combination of vapour permeation and adsorption is a promising alternative allowing for producing ethanol with high purities at lower operating pressures compared to the vapour permeation as stand alone process.

[1]  Richard W. Baker,et al.  Permeability, permeance and selectivity: A preferred way of reporting pervaporation performance data , 2010 .

[2]  P. Kreis,et al.  Rate Based Modelling and Simulation Studies of Hybrid Processes consisting of Distillation, Vapour Permeation and Adsorption for the dehydration of ethanol , 2009 .

[3]  Andrzej Górak,et al.  Prozessintensivierung: Reaktive und membranunterstützte Rektifikation , 2007 .

[4]  N. Wakao,et al.  EFFECT OF FLUID DISPERSION COEFFICIENTS ON PARTICLE-TO-FLUID MASS TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS IN PACKED BEDS. CORRELATION OF SHERWOOD NUMBERS , 1978 .

[5]  Andrzej Górak,et al.  Intensified reaction and separation systems. , 2011, Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering.

[6]  Johan Grievink,et al.  Process intensification and process systems engineering: A friendly symbiosis , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[7]  Christopher J. Brown,et al.  Simulation of pressure swing adsorption in fuel ethanol production process , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  Frank Lipnizki,et al.  Pervaporation-based hybrid process: a review of process design, applications and economics , 1999 .

[9]  T. P. Lyons,et al.  The alcohol textbook , 2003 .

[10]  Douglas M. Ruthven,et al.  Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes , 1984 .

[11]  H. Hirschberg.  Handbuch Verfahrenstechnik und Anlagenbau , 1999 .

[12]  Huajiang Huang,et al.  A review of separation technologies in current and future biorefineries , 2008 .

[13]  James M. Douglas,et al.  Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes , 1988 .

[14]  Stefan Turek,et al.  Novel Simulation Approaches for Cyclic Steady-state Fixed-bed Processes Exhibiting Sharp Fronts and Shocks , 2005 .

[15]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Design and optimization of pressure swing adsorption systems with parallel implementation , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[16]  Andrew G. Livingston,et al.  Membranes for the dehydration of solvents by pervaporation , 2008 .

[17]  J. Modl.  Jilin fuel ethanol plant. , 2004 .

[18]  J. Caro,et al.  Zeolite membranes – Recent developments and progress , 2008 .

[19]  A. Górak,et al.  Process Analysis of Hybrid Separation Processes: Combination of Distillation and Pervaporation , 2006 .

[20]  J. G. Wijmans,et al.  The solution-diffusion model: a review , 1995 .

[21]  Pierre Lochon,et al.  Industrial state-of-the-art of pervaporation and vapour permeation in the western countries , 2002 .

[22]  V. Hlavácek,et al.  Adsorption/Desorption of Water and Ethanol on 3A Zeolite in Near-Adiabatic Fixed Bed , 2009 .

[23]  Achim Hoffmann,et al.  Catalytic distillation in structured packings: Methyl acetate synthesis , 2001 .

[24]  J. Maćkowiak.  Neue Aspekte der Modellierung bei der Fluiddynamik von Packungskolonnen , 2006 .

[25]  Shamsuzzaman Farooq,et al.  Kinetics of hydrocarbon adsorption on activated carbon and silica gel , 1997 .

[26]  R. Billet,et al.  Prediction of Mass Transfer Columns with Dumped and Arranged Packings , 1999 .

[27]  C. Buchaly,et al.  Hybride Trennverfahren: Verschaltung von Reaktivrektifikation und Dampfpermeation , 2008 .

[28]  G. Eigenberger,et al.  On the efficient simulation and analysis of regenerative processes in cyclic operation , 1997 .

[29]  Leland M. Vane,et al.  A review of pervaporation for product recovery from biomass fermentation processes , 2005 .

[30]  Sundergopal Sridhar,et al.  Separation of organic–organic mixtures by pervaporation—a review , 2004 .

[31]  Gerhart Eigenberger,et al.  Measurement and Modeling of Water Vapor Adsorption on Zeolite 4A—Equilibria and Kinetics , 2004 .

[32]  Eugeny Y. Kenig,et al.  Rate-based modelling and simulation of reactive separations in gas/vapour–liquid systems , 2005 .

[33]  N. Wakao,et al.  Effect of fluid dispersion coefficients on particle-to-fluid heat transfer coefficients in packed beds , 1978 .