Computer-Aided Assessment of Safety Countermeasures for Industrial Human-Robot Collaborative Applications

Human and robot collaboration represents an interesting development direction for traditional industrial robotic solutions. Especially for those cases where the operations are difficult to automate or burdensome for manual execution, the mutual exchange of human sensitivity and robot repeatability represents an effective approach. Nevertheless, industrial robots are poorly involved for collaborative tasks since specific safety countermeasures are required to avoid all the potential hazards. Consequently, the design and assessment of safety solutions represents a fundamental phase to estimate feasibility of industrial collaborative solutions. The presented work proposes a computer-aided approach to identify, assess and optimize the safety systems that enables the collaborative usage of industrial robots. It exploits the capabilities of virtual controller-based offline programming packages to design in advance the safety countermeasures. An initial consistency test validates the response of the selected tool with respect to the safety functionalities. Subsequently, a virtual replica of a potential industrial collaborative solution has been developed. As a result, it has been possible to mimic the behaviour of such a system with respect to Speed and Separation Monitoring collaborative method.

[1]  Andrzej Burghardt,et al.  Monitoring the Parameters of Industrial Robots , 2018, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering.

[2]  Pedro Arezes,et al.  A Brief Overview of the Use of Collaborative Robots in Industry 4.0: Human Role and Safety , 2019, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control.

[3]  Bernd Kuhlenkötter,et al.  Human Robot Interaction – learning how to integrate collaborative robots into manual assembly lines , 2019 .

[4]  Francesco Leali,et al.  Evaluation of operator relief for an effective design of HRC workcells , 2016, 2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[5]  Steffen Liebergeld,et al.  Taming the Robot , 2011 .

[6]  Richard Bloss,et al.  Collaborative robots are rapidly providing major improvements in productivity, safety, programing ease, portability and cost while addressing many new applications , 2016, Ind. Robot.

[7]  Arne Bilberg,et al.  Digital twins of human robot collaboration in a production setting , 2018 .

[8]  Ramon Casanelles,et al.  Towards high performance in press automation: An ABB view , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).

[9]  Christine Connolly Technology and applications of ABB RobotStudio , 2009, Ind. Robot.

[10]  Kerstin Johansen,et al.  Safe Layout Design and Evaluation of a Human-Robot Collaborative Application Cell through Risk Assessment – A Computer Aided Approach , 2018 .

[11]  Hao Ding,et al.  Dynamic speed and separation monitoring for collaborative robot applications - Concepts and performance , 2019, Robotics Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[12]  Daynier Rolando Delgado Sobrino,et al.  An Innovative Approach of Industrial Robot Programming Using Virtual Reality for the Design of Production Systems Layout , 2019 .

[13]  Åsa Fast-Berglund,et al.  Evaluating Cobots for Final Assembly , 2016 .

[14]  Francesco Leali,et al.  Offline workpiece calibration method for robotic reconfigurable machining platform , 2014, Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[15]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  Seamless human robot collaborative assembly – An automotive case study , 2018, Mechatronics.

[16]  Remus Boca,et al.  Performance Impact Assessment for SSM using Simulated Stations , 2018 .