Surface skin protection of concrete with silicate-based impregnations: Influence of the substrate roughness and moisture

Abstract Silicate-based impregnations are often used to protect concrete against aggressive external actions. However, the understanding of several aspects concerning this type of impregnations is still rather limited, including the influence of the concrete substrate on their performance. This paper presents results of an experimental study about (i) the efficacy of silicate-based impregnations to protect concrete elements, and (ii) the influence of the concrete substrate’s characteristics on the performance of such superficial protection. Concrete specimens with two different water/cement ratios (0.40 and 0.70) were produced and, prior to the application of the impregnation, were prepared following different procedures that created (i) three different surface roughnesses (no surface preparation, 160 bar water jet and needle scalers) and (ii) three different moisture contents (3.0%, 4.5% and 6.0%). The performance of unprotected and protected concrete specimens was assessed by means of the following procedures, indicated in EN 1504-2 standard: (i) product penetration depth; (ii) water absorption by immersion; (iii) abrasion resistance; (iv) impact resistance; and (v) bond strength. Results obtained show that the silicate-based impregnation was effective in improving the resistance to water penetration and abrasion resistance, but did not improve the resistance to impact. The surface roughness and the moisture content at the instant of the application of the surface protection proved to influence the performance of the impregnation product, however such influence was dependent on the property at stake.

[1]  Susan Macdonald Concrete : building pathology , 2003 .

[2]  Mohammad Shekarchi,et al.  Time-dependent performance of concrete surface coatings in tidal zone of marine environment , 2012 .

[3]  Jian-Guo Dai,et al.  Water repellent surface impregnation for extension of service life of reinforced concrete structures in marine environments: The role of cracks , 2010 .

[4]  Fernando Branco,et al.  BuildingsLife: a building management system , 2014 .

[5]  Mohammed K. Ibrahim,et al.  Effectiveness of concrete surface treatmentmaterials in reducing chloride-induced reinforcement corrosion , 1997 .

[6]  Arthur Seymour Jennings,et al.  Paints And Varnishes , 2008 .

[7]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Life-Cycle Performance of Deteriorating Structures , 2003 .

[8]  B. Scheetz,et al.  Characterization of silicate sealers on concrete , 1997 .

[9]  Marc-André Bérubé,et al.  Evaluation of surface sealers for concrete hydraulic structures exposed to low temperatures , 2011 .

[10]  D. Cleland,et al.  Durability and water absorption properties of surface treated concretes , 2011 .

[11]  F. H. Dakhil,et al.  Use of Surface Treatment Materials to Improve Concrete Durability , 1999 .

[12]  Pietro Lura,et al.  Ethyl silicate for surface treatment of concrete – Part II: Characteristics and performance , 2012 .

[13]  Pam Basheer,et al.  Surface treatments for concrete: assessmentmethods and reported performance , 1997 .

[14]  J. Beaudoin,et al.  Mechanical properties of calcium silicate hydrates , 2011 .