RECONFIGURABLE CONTROL USING CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION

A conceptual scheme for reconfiguring control systems in the event of major failures is advocated. This addresses a 'big problem' which is understandable by the man in the street, delivers enormous benefits if it can be made to work, and requires interesting and challenging research from control and systems theorists and practitioners. The scheme relies on the convergence of several technologies which are currently emerging: Constrained predictive control, High-fidelity modelling of complex systems , Fault detection and identification, and Model approximation and simplification. Much work is needed, both theoretical and algorithmic, to get this scheme to work, but we believe that there is enough evidence, especially from existing industrial practice, for the scheme to be considered achievable. After outlining the problem and proposed solution, the paper briefly reviews constrained predictive control, object-oriented modelling , which is an essential ingredient for practical implementation, and the prospects for automatic model simplification. The paper emphasises some emerging trends in industrial practice, as regards modelling and control of complex systems. Examples from process control and flight control are used to illustrate some of the ideas.

[1]  Ten-Huei Guo,et al.  Real-time accommodation of actuator faults on a reusable rocket engine , 1996, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[2]  H. E. Rauch,et al.  Autonomous control reconfiguration , 1995 .

[3]  J. Maciejowski,et al.  Decoupled control of a macroeconomic model using frequency-domain methods , 1984 .

[4]  A. Morse Supervisory control of families of linear set-point controllers Part I. Exact matching , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[5]  Samir Bennani,et al.  Robust flight control : a design challenge , 1997 .

[6]  Jan M. Maciejowski,et al.  Parameter estimation of multivariable systems using balanced realizations , 1996 .

[7]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Tuning of model predictive controllers for robust performance , 1994 .

[8]  David Q. Mayne,et al.  Optimization Based Design and Control , 1993 .

[9]  Manus P. Henry,et al.  The Implications of Digital Communications on Sensor Validation , 1992 .

[10]  W. Larimore System Identification, Reduced-Order Filtering and Modeling via Canonical Variate Analysis , 1983, 1983 American Control Conference.

[11]  Kevin M. Passino,et al.  Expert supervision of fuzzy learning systems for fault tolerant aircraft control , 1995 .

[12]  Jan M. Maciejowski,et al.  Realization of stable models with subspace methods , 1996, Autom..

[13]  J. Maciejowski,et al.  System identification using balanced parametrizations , 1997, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[14]  Hilding Elmqvist,et al.  DYMOLA - A Structured Model Language for Large Continuous Systems , 1978 .

[15]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Just in time models for dynamical systems , 1996, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[16]  Wolfgang Marquardt,et al.  Trends in computer-aided process modeling , 1996 .

[17]  Michel Gevers,et al.  Towards a Joint Design of Identification and Control , 1993 .

[18]  Jan M. Maciejowski,et al.  The Implicit Daisy-Chaining Property of Constrained Predictive Control , 1997 .

[19]  C. R. Cutler,et al.  Dynamic matrix control¿A computer control algorithm , 1979 .

[20]  Peter S. Maybeck,et al.  Reconfigurable flight control via multiple model adaptive control methods , 1991 .

[21]  John R. Broussard,et al.  Application of precomputed control laws in a reconfigurable aircraft flight control system , 1989 .

[22]  François E. Cellier,et al.  Continuous system modeling , 1991 .

[23]  Mats Andersson,et al.  Object-Oriented Modeling and Simulation , 1993 .