Multiobjective Optimization of a Benfield HiPure Gas Sweetening Unit

We show how a multiobjective bare-bones particle swarm optimization can be used for a process parameter tuning and performance enhancement of a natural gas sweetening unit. This has been made through maximization of hydrocarbon recovery and minimization of the total energy of the process as the two objectives of the optimization. A trade-off exists between these two objectives as illustrated by the Pareto front. This algorithm has been applied to a sweetening unit that uses the Benfield HiPure process. Detailed models of the natural gas unit are developed in ProMax process simulator and integrated to the multi-objective optimization developed in visual basic environment (VBA). In this study, the solvent circulation rates, stripper pressure and reboiler duties are considered as the decision variables while hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide concentrations in the sweetened gas are considered as process constraints. The upper and lower bounds of the decision variables are obtained through a parametric sensitivity analysis of the models. The Pareto sets show a significant improvement in hydrocarbon recovery and a decent reduction in the heat consumption of the process.

[1]  Tariq Shamim,et al.  Parametric and Exergetic Analysis of a Power Plant with CO2 Capture using Chemical Looping Combustion , .

[2]  Mohammad Reza Rahimpour,et al.  MODELING AND SIMULATION OF INDUSTRIAL CARBON DIOXIDE ABSORBER USING AMINE-PROMOTED POTASH SOLUTION , 2004 .

[3]  François Maréchal,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of an advanced combined cycle power plant including CO2 separation options , 2006 .

[4]  David W. Coit,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  James Kennedy,et al.  Bare bones particle swarms , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium. SIS'03 (Cat. No.03EX706).

[6]  Mohammad Mehdi Montazer-Rahmati,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of an industrial hydrogen plant consisting of a CO2 absorber using DGA and a methanator , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[7]  Robert A. Hubbard.  The Role of Gas Processing in the Natural-Gas Value Chain , 2009 .

[8]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Multi-criterion Pareto based particle swarm optimized polynomial neural network for classification: A review and state-of-the-art , 2009, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[9]  R. Ocampo-Pérez,et al.  Adsorption of Fluoride from Water Solution on Bone Char , 2007 .

[10]  Mohammad Reza Rahimpour,et al.  Enhanced carbon dioxide removal by promoted hot potassium carbonate in a split-flow absorber , 2004 .

[11]  Jerry A. Bullin,et al.  Alternative Flow Schemes to Reduce Capital and Operating Costs of Amine Sweetening Units , 2006 .

[12]  Megan Jobson,et al.  RETROFIT DESIGN FOR GAS SWEETENING PROCESSES , 2006 .

[13]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Computers and Chemical Engineering , 2014 .

[14]  H. Pierreval,et al.  Using evolutionary algorithms and simulation for the optimization of manufacturing systems , 1997 .

[15]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Multi-objective design optimization of a natural gas-combined cycle with carbon dioxide capture in a life cycle perspective , 2010 .

[16]  Shapour Azarm,et al.  A multi-objective genetic algorithm for robust design optimization , 2005, GECCO '05.

[17]  R. Marler,et al.  The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights , 2010 .

[18]  G. Versteeg,et al.  CO2 capture from power plants. Part I: A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine , 2007 .

[19]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering , 2004 .

[20]  Amornvadee Veawab,et al.  Mathematical modelling of mass-transfer and hydrodynamics in CO2 absorbers packed with structured packings , 2003 .

[21]  François Maréchal,et al.  Multi-Criteria Optimization of an Advanced Combined Cycle Power Plant including CO 2 Separation Options , 2006 .

[22]  Li Sun,et al.  A Strategy for Multi-objective Optimization under Uncertainty in Chemical Process Design , 2008 .

[23]  B. Koehret,et al.  Flowsheet Optimization and Optimal Sensitivity Analysis Using Exact Derivatives , 2007 .

[24]  H. E. Benson,et al.  HIPURE PROCESS REMOVES CO2/H2S , 1974 .

[25]  T. F. Edgar,et al.  Simulation of the hot carbonate process for removal of CO/sub 2/ and H/sub 2/S from medium Btu gas , 1984 .

[26]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[27]  Kyun Young Park,et al.  Computer simulation of H2S and CO2 absorption processesabsorption processes , 1995 .

[28]  H. E. Benson,et al.  HiPure process removes CO/sub 2//H/sub 2/S. [Excellant process for purification of natural gas to pipeline purity] , 1974 .

[29]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study , 1998, PPSN.

[30]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Flowsheet optimization and optimal sensitivity analysis using analytical derivatives , 1994 .

[31]  Michael N. Vrahatis,et al.  Recent approaches to global optimization problems through Particle Swarm Optimization , 2002, Natural Computing.

[32]  Ralph H. Weiland,et al.  Stripping of carbon dioxide from monoethanolamine solutions in a packed column , 1982 .

[33]  Karen High,et al.  Process enhancement through waste minimization and multiobjective optimization , 2012 .

[34]  Wei Wu,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization of a Hydrogen Production System with Low CO2 Emissions , 2012 .

[35]  Devid Desfreed Kennedy,et al.  Novel bare-bones particle swarm optimization and its performance for modeling vapor–liquid equilibrium data , 2011 .

[36]  C. Coello,et al.  Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimizers : A Survey of the State-ofthe-Art , 2006 .