Changes in Effective Connectivity According to Working Memory Load: An fMRI Study of Face and Location Working Memory Tasks

Objective The functional strategic mechanisms in the brain during performing visuospatial working memory tasks, especially tasks with heavy load, are controversial. We conducted the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while sixteen subjects were performing face- and location-matching n-back tasks to examine causal relations within the frontoparietal networks. Methods We applied a sophisticated method, the structural equation modeling (SEM), to the fMRI data. The imaging data were analyzed by extracting the task-related eigenseries using the principal component analysis (PCA) and then by applying a form of data-driven model called the automated search method. Results The SEM analyses revealed a functional shift of network connectivity from the right to the left hemisphere with increasing load in the face-matching n-back tasks while the location-matching tasks required bilateral activation. In the locating matching n-back tasks, a pattern of parallel processing was observed in the left phonological loop and the right inferior parietal regions. Furthermore, object working memory-related activities in the left hemisphere reliably contributed to performance of both the face- and location-matching 2-back tasks. Conclusion Our results are consistent with previous reports in terms of demonstrating parallel and distributed information processing during performing working memory tasks with heavy loads. Our results additionally suggest a dynamic shift between the fast imagery circuit (right hemisphere) and the stable verbal circuit (left hemisphere), depending on task load.

[1]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[2]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Interindividual differences in functional interactions among prefrontal, parietal and parahippocampal regions during working memory. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  N‐back working memory paradigm: A meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory , 1997, Nature.

[6]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Functional connectivity in an fMRI working memory task in high-functioning autism , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  Jieun Kim,et al.  Effects of Verbal Working Memory Load on Corticocortical Connectivity Modeled by Path Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Neural modeling, functional brain imaging, and cognition , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  R. Buxton,et al.  The development of face and location processing: an fMRI study , 2003 .

[10]  Jieun Kim,et al.  How well does structural equation modeling reveal abnormal brain anatomical connections? An fMRI simulation study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[11]  G. de Marco,et al.  Changes in effective connectivity during incidental and intentional perception of fearful faces , 2006, NeuroImage.

[12]  D. Tomasi,et al.  Different activation patterns for working memory load and visual attention load , 2007, Brain Research.

[13]  A. Baddeley Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Streichenwein Sm,et al.  Am J Psychiatry , 1996 .

[15]  Edward Awh,et al.  Spatial versus Object Working Memory: PET Investigations , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Neural systems that encode categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: PET investigations , 1998, Psychobiology.

[17]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Changes in limbic and prefrontal functional interactions in a working memory task for faces. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Dissociation of object and spatial processing domains in primate prefrontal cortex. , 1993, Science.

[19]  M. Just,et al.  fMRI investigation of working memory for faces in autism: visual coding and underconnectivity with frontal areas. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  Joseph B. Sala,et al.  Binding of What and Where During Working Memory Maintenance , 2007, Cortex.

[21]  J. Desmond,et al.  The contributions of cerebro-cerebellar circuitry to executive verbal working memory , 2010, Cortex.

[22]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET , 1993, Nature.

[23]  Cheryl L. Grady,et al.  Hemispheric differences in neural systems for face working memory: A PET‐rCBF study , 1995 .

[24]  W Gerbino,et al.  Mental image reversal and verbal recoding: When ducks become rabbits , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[26]  Hae-Jeong Park,et al.  Functional disconnection between the prefrontal and parietal cortices during working memory processing in schizophrenia: a[15(O)]H2O PET study. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  E. Bullmore,et al.  How Good Is Good Enough in Path Analysis of fMRI Data? , 2000, NeuroImage.

[31]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  Takashi Hanakawa,et al.  Connectivity and signal intensity in the parieto-occipital cortex predicts top-down attentional effect in visual masking: An fMRI study based on individual differences , 2009, NeuroImage.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.