Which Orientation for Strategies and Policies for Local Animal Breeds: The Role of ICT and Novel Strategies

Local breeds are endowed with numerous advantages in terms of adaptability to specific conditions and the sustainable utilization of resources. Nonetheless, their role is neglected when their multiple societal, economic and environmental contributions are not properly acknowledged and interest is focused only on productivity issues. This paper explores the role of local breeds and the development of effective conservation strategies and relevant policy measures. The paper focuses on the reasons behind the underestimation of the values with which local breeds are endowed and discusses how economic development, policies and market competition have rendered many of these breeds in danger of extinction. The development of a new paradigm of conservation strategies, which could also be extended to breeding programs, is presented here, which incorporates ICT, new technologies and innovations. It is concluded that using proper measures and achieving synergies between actors and measures, local breeds can be protected in order to continue supporting multifunctional production systems and local short value chains.

[1]  A. Legarra,et al.  Economic weights of fertility, prolificacy, milk yield and longevity in dairy sheep. , 2007, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[2]  A. Bernués,et al.  Role of self-sufficiency, productivity and diversification on the economic sustainability of farming systems with autochthonous sheep breeds in less favoured areas in Southern Europe. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[3]  A. Fadlaoui,et al.  Economic Evaluation and Biodiversity Conservation of Animal Genetic Resources , 2003 .

[4]  T. Söderqvist,et al.  Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands; scientific integration for management and policy , 2000 .

[5]  E. Corbera,et al.  “We are the city lungs”: Payments for ecosystem services in the outskirts of Mexico City , 2015 .

[6]  David Pearce,et al.  Valuing biological diversity: issues and overview , 2001 .

[7]  Markku Ollikainen,et al.  Agri‐environmental externalities: a framework for designing targeted policies , 2003 .

[8]  A. Rayner,et al.  Agricultural policy in Western Europe and the United States , 1991 .

[9]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation , 2002 .

[10]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[11]  J. Gibson,et al.  Animal genetic resources and economic development: issues in relation to economic valuation , 2003 .

[12]  R. S. D. Motta Economics of natural resources and the environment , 1990 .

[13]  T. Ramachandra,et al.  Economic valuation of wetlands. , 2005, Journal of environmental biology.

[14]  J. Louviere,et al.  Final Report Introduction to Attribute-Based Stated Choice Methods , 1998 .

[15]  I. Bateman Economic valuation with stated preference techniques : a manual : department for transport , 2002 .

[16]  A. Ragkos,et al.  Using the choice experiment method in the design of breeding goals in dairy sheep. , 2015, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[17]  M. Arriaza,et al.  The design of agri-environmental schemes: Farmers’ preferences in southern Spain , 2015 .

[18]  Sandra Rousseau,et al.  Green market expansion by reducing information asymmetries: Evidence for labeled organic food products , 2013 .