QSPR modeling of selectivity at infinite dilution of ionic liquids

The intelligent choice of extractants and entrainers can improve current mixture separation techniques allowing better efficiency and sustainability of chemical processes that are both used in industry and laboratory practice. The most promising approach is a straightforward comparison of selectivity at infinite dilution between potential candidates. However, selectivity at infinite dilution values are rarely available for most compounds so a theoretical estimation is highly desired. In this study, we suggest a Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship (QSPR) approach to the modelling of the selectivity at infinite dilution of ionic liquids. Additionally, auxiliary models were developed to overcome the potential bias from big activity coefficient at infinite dilution from the solute. Data from SelinfDB database was used as training and internal validation sets in QSPR model development. External validation was done with the data from literature. The selection of the best models was done using decision functions that aim to diminish bias in prediction of the data points associated with the underrepresented ionic liquids or extreme temperatures. The best models were used for the virtual screening for potential azeotrope breakers of aniline +  n -dodecane mixture. The subject of screening was a combinatorial library of ionic liquids, created based on the previously unused combinations of cations and anions from SelinfDB and the test set extractants. Both selectivity at infinite dilution and auxiliary models show good performance in the validation. Our models’ predictions were compared to the ones of the COSMO-RS, where applicable, displaying smaller prediction error. The best ionic liquid to extract aniline from n -dodecane was suggested.

[1]  A. Varnek,et al.  Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship (QSPR) Modeling of Normal Boiling Point Temperature and Composition of Binary Azeotropes , 2011 .

[2]  Nina Nikolova-Jeliazkova,et al.  QSAR Applicability Domain Estimation by Projection of the Training Set in Descriptor Space: A Review , 2005, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[3]  D. N. Hanson,et al.  Multieffect extractive distillation for separating aqueous azeotropes , 1986 .

[4]  SelinfDB: A Database of Selectivity at Infinite Dilution for Liquid–Liquid Extraction , 2021 .

[5]  J. Aires-de-Sousa,et al.  QSPR Modeling of Liquid‐liquid Equilibria in Two‐phase Systems of Water and Ionic Liquid , 2020, Molecular informatics.

[6]  Gorica R. Ivaniš,et al.  Solutions of ionic liquids with diverse aliphatic and aromatic solutes – Phase behavior and potentials for applications: A review article , 2014, Arabian Journal of Chemistry.

[7]  Kamil Paduszyński,et al.  An overview of the performance of the COSMO-RS approach in predicting the activity coefficients of molecular solutes in ionic liquids and derived properties at infinite dilution. , 2017, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[8]  P. Carr,et al.  Predictive ability of the MOSCED and UNIFAC activity coefficient estimation methods , 1987 .

[9]  S. Pinho,et al.  Ionic liquids as entrainers for terpenes fractionation and other relevant separation problems , 2020 .

[10]  G Marcou,et al.  QSPR Approach to Predict Nonadditive Properties of Mixtures. Application to Bubble Point Temperatures of Binary Mixtures of Liquids , 2012, Molecular informatics.

[11]  Joel H. Hildebrand,et al.  Solubility of Non-Electrolytes , 1936, Nature.

[12]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[13]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Feature normalization and likelihood-based similarity measures for image retrieval , 2001, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[14]  Kyrylo Klimenko,et al.  R‐based Tool for a Pairwise Structure‐activity Relationship Analysis , 2018, Molecular informatics.

[15]  K. R. Seddon,et al.  The distillation and volatility of ionic liquids , 2006, Nature.

[16]  Paul H. Maupin,et al.  Flammability and Thermal Analysis Characterization of Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids , 2006 .

[17]  I. Kikic,et al.  On the combinatorial part of the UNIFAC and UNIQUAC models , 1980 .

[18]  Kai Sundmacher,et al.  Neural Recommender System for Activity Coefficient Prediction and UNIFAC Model Extension of Ionic Liquid-Solute Systems , 2020 .

[19]  A. J. Staverman The entropy of high polymer solutions. Generalization of formulae , 1950 .

[20]  M. Laidi,et al.  Dragonfly-Support Vector Machine for Regression Modeling of the Activity Coefficient at Infinite Dilution of Solutes in Imidazolium Ionic Liquids Using σ-Profile Descriptors , 2020 .

[21]  Salah Hanini,et al.  Modeling the activity coefficient at infinite dilution of water in ionic liquids using artificial neural networks and support vector machines , 2019, Neural Computing and Applications.

[22]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[23]  Peter Murray-Rust,et al.  Chemical Name to Structure: OPSIN, an Open Source Solution , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[24]  A. Klamt,et al.  Fast solvent screening via quantum chemistry: COSMO‐RS approach , 2002 .

[25]  Kamil Paduszynski,et al.  In Silico Calculation of Infinite Dilution Activity Coefficients of Molecular Solutes in Ionic Liquids: Critical Review of Current Methods and New Models Based on Three Machine Learning Algorithms , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[26]  L. Rebelo,et al.  Chemoinformatic approaches to predict the viscosities of ionic liquids and ionic liquid-containing systems. , 2019, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[27]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Novel enhanced applications of QSPR models: Temperature dependence of aqueous solubility , 2016, J. Comput. Chem..

[28]  Igor V. Tetko,et al.  Modeling of non-additive mixture properties using the Online CHEmical database and Modeling environment (OCHEM) , 2013, Journal of Cheminformatics.