Discriminative sparse coding on multi-manifolds

Sparse coding has been popularly used as an effective data representation method in various applications, such as computer vision, medical imaging and bioinformatics. However, the conventional sparse coding algorithms and their manifold-regularized variants (graph sparse coding and Laplacian sparse coding), learn codebooks and codes in an unsupervised manner and neglect class information that is available in the training set. To address this problem, we propose a novel discriminative sparse coding method based on multi-manifolds, that learns discriminative class-conditioned codebooks and sparse codes from both data feature spaces and class labels. First, the entire training set is partitioned into multiple manifolds according to the class labels. Then, we formulate the sparse coding as a manifold-manifold matching problem and learn class-conditioned codebooks and codes to maximize the manifold margins of different classes. Lastly, we present a data sample-manifold matching-based strategy to classify the unlabeled data samples. Experimental results on somatic mutations identification and breast tumor classification based on ultrasonic images demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed data representation and classification approach.

[1]  Sridhar Krishna Nemala,et al.  Sparse coding for speech recognition , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[2]  Mohammad Reza Keyvanpour,et al.  Semi-supervised text categorization: Exploiting unlabeled data using ensemble learning algorithms , 2013, Intell. Data Anal..

[3]  Liang-Tien Chia,et al.  Local features are not lonely – Laplacian sparse coding for image classification , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[4]  J. Augsburger,et al.  Embyronal carcinoma of testis metastatic to ciliary body presenting as spontaneous hyphema and painful secondary glaucoma. , 2013, Retinal cases & brief reports.

[5]  Jun Sun,et al.  Sparse image coding with clustering property and its application to face recognition , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Liang-Tien Chia,et al.  Laplacian Sparse Coding, Hypergraph Laplacian Sparse Coding, and Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Thomas Ernst,et al.  Genotyping of 25 leukemia-associated genes in a single work flow by next-generation sequencing technology with low amounts of input template DNA. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[8]  Hasik Sunwoo Multi-degree reduction of Bézier curves for fixed endpoints using Lagrange multipliers , 2013 .

[9]  G. Meloni,et al.  Mammography and Ultrasound Imaging of Preinvasive and Invasive Canine Spontaneous Mammary Cancer and Their Similarities to Human Breast Cancer , 2011, Cancer Prevention Research.

[10]  Darragh G. McArt,et al.  Validation of Next Generation Sequencing Technologies in Comparison to Current Diagnostic Gold Standards for BRAF, EGFR and KRAS Mutational Analysis , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Kazuhiko Hamamoto,et al.  Discrimination of breast tumors in ultrasonic images by classifier ensemble trained with AdaBoost , 2011 .

[12]  Milutin R. Dostanić Regularized trace of the inverse of the dirichlet laplacian , 2011 .

[13]  Gholamreza Haffari,et al.  Feature-based classifiers for somatic mutation detection in tumour–normal paired sequencing data , 2011, Bioinform..

[14]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Online Learning for Matrix Factorization and Sparse Coding , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  Gang Wang,et al.  Discriminative multi-manifold analysis for face recognition from a single training sample per person , 2011, ICCV.

[16]  Chun Chen,et al.  Graph Regularized Sparse Coding for Image Representation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  K. Kreutz-Delgado,et al.  Sparse image coding using learned overcomplete dictionaries , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 14th IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop Machine Learning for Signal Processing, 2004..

[18]  Olivier A. Bauchau,et al.  Improved Finite Element Domain Decomposition Method Using Local and Mixed Lagrange Multipliers , 2013 .

[19]  Kenneth Hoyt,et al.  Volumetric Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging to Assess Early Response to Apoptosis‐Inducing Anti–Death Receptor 5 Antibody Therapy in a Breast Cancer Animal Model , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[20]  Rajat Raina,et al.  Efficient sparse coding algorithms , 2006, NIPS.

[21]  Gang Wang,et al.  Discriminative multi-manifold analysis for face recognition from a single training sample per person , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[22]  Chun Chen,et al.  Image representation using Laplacian regularized nonnegative tensor factorization , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[23]  J A Noble,et al.  A pilot study to evaluate assisted freehand ultrasound elasticity imaging in the sizing of early breast cancer: a comparison of B-mode and AFUSON elasticity ultrasound with histopathology measurements. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[24]  J. Eggert,et al.  Sparse coding and NMF , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541).

[25]  Liang Zhao,et al.  Semi-Supervised Learning Using Random Walk Limiting Probabilities , 2013, ISNN.

[26]  Sébastien Loisel,et al.  Sharp Condition Number Estimates for the Symmetric 2-Lagrange Multiplier Method , 2013, Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XX.

[27]  Giorgio Valentini,et al.  A neural network algorithm for semi-supervised node label learning from unbalanced data , 2013, Neural Networks.

[28]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A high-order discontinuous Galerkin method with Lagrange multipliers for advection-diffusion problems , 2013 .

[29]  Lydia M Contreras,et al.  Discovery of posttranscriptional regulatory RNAs using next generation sequencing technologies. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[30]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Earlier detection of breast cancer with ultrasound molecular imaging in a transgenic mouse model. , 2013, Cancer research.

[31]  Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy,et al.  Improved sparse coding using manifold projections , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[32]  Ifije E. Ohiorhenuan,et al.  Sparse coding and high-order correlations in fine-scale cortical networks , 2010, Nature.

[33]  MayanK KuMar Singh Primary Hydatid Cyst of the Breast Masquerading as a Fibroadenoma: A Case Report , 2012 .

[34]  Jianer Chen,et al.  Application-oriented purely semantic precision and recall for ontology mapping evaluation , 2008, Knowl. Based Syst..

[35]  Patrick J. Wolfe,et al.  Image analysis with regularized Laplacian eigenmaps , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[36]  Shawn E. Yost,et al.  Mutascope: sensitive detection of somatic mutations from deep amplicon sequencing , 2013, Bioinform..

[37]  Michael W. Mahoney,et al.  Regularized Laplacian Estimation and Fast Eigenvector Approximation , 2011, NIPS.

[38]  Thomas Martinetz,et al.  Sparse Coding Neural Gas: Learning of overcomplete data representations , 2009, Neurocomputing.