Humanitarian Demining Using an Insect Based Chemical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Nowadays, there are about 100 million active landmines distributed around the world as the result of earlier conflicts (Habib 2007). These cheap and simple to manufacture weapons have a long lasting effect that cause injury to the civil population even decades after the conflict has ended. Their removal is very expensive, dangerous and time consuming, and it has a high social and economical impact. Hence, although demining is a necessity for the affected populations to recover, it poses fundamental technical challenges. At the present time, the use of animals, i.e. biological sensors, still provides the highest accuracy and safety standards in demining tasks. A number of animal species including dogs, rats and bees have been successfully trained to detect and localize landmines following the minute chemical trails of leaking explosive compounds (Fjellanger et al. 2002; Bromenshenk et al. 2003; Verhagen et al. 2006). Insects, and in particular moths, are highly optimized chemical detection systems that are extremely proficient at the detection and localization of different chemical compounds, in particular pheromones, at very long distances, i.e. several hundreds of meters. Moths use pheromone signals for sexual communication and it has been shown that males are able to detect and distinguish minute amounts of female pheromones (as little as 104 molecules·cm–3) against a background of other chemicals in very irregular and unpredictable plumes (Wyatt 2003). As a consequence, the evolutionary pressure to detect pheromones has generated specific neural and behavioral adaptations to deal with this specific problem. Nonetheless, the chemical search task is not reduced to a unique olfactory process but is a multi-modal task that includes the integration of complex behavioral strategies with visual, olfactory and wind sensing information (Kennedy & Marsh 1974; Ludlow 1982; Charlton & Carde. 1990). In this chapter we analyze the relationship between the chemical detection and localization problem and its biological solution, and we will show how our understanding of the biological solution can be exploited to construct efficient autonomous chemo-sensing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (cUAV). Firstly, we describe a blimp-based technology for a cUAV. Subsequently, we investigate the computational and behavioral principles underlying the opto-motor system of the fly and the locust, and we show that relying solely

[1]  T. Pompl,et al.  Ozone-enhanced molecular beam deposition of nickel oxide (NiO) for sensor applications , 1997 .

[2]  P. Simmons,et al.  Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. I. Selective responses to approaching objects. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Reid R. Harrison,et al.  A biologically inspired analog IC for visual collision detection , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[4]  W Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[5]  Klaus Hausen,et al.  Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  Mark A. Willis,et al.  Effects of intermittent and continuous pheromone stimulation on the flight behaviour of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta , 1984 .

[7]  G. Laurent,et al.  Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field, Motion-Sensitive Neuron , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Borst,et al.  Motion computation and visual orientation in flies. , 1993, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Comparative physiology.

[9]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[10]  A Borst,et al.  Fly motion vision is based on Reichardt detectors regardless of the signal-to-noise ratio. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Responses of male Helicoverpa zea to single pulses of sex pheromone and behavioural antagonist , 2001 .

[12]  J. Hildebrand,et al.  Functionally distinct subdivisions of the macroglomerular complex in the antennal lobe of the male sphinx moth Manduca sexta , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  K. Hausen Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  Lino Marques,et al.  Mobile pneumatic robot for demining , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[15]  T. L. Payne,et al.  Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction , 1986 .

[16]  R. Cardé,et al.  Influence of plume structure and pheromone concentration on upwind flight of Cadra cautella males , 1995 .

[17]  R. Kanzaki,et al.  Coordination of flipflopping neural signals and head turning during pheromone-mediated walking in a male silkworm moth Bombyx mori , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[18]  Maki K. Habib,et al.  Humanitarian Demining: Reality and the Challenge of Technology – The State of the Arts , 2007 .

[19]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  IQR: a distributed system for real-time real-world neuronal simulation , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[20]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Pheromone-Regulated Anemotaxis in Flying Moths , 1974, Science.

[21]  J. Thorp,et al.  Chemical Communication and Agonism in the Crayfish, Procambarus acutus acutus , 1978 .

[22]  C. Koch,et al.  Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming , 2002, Nature.

[23]  Svetha Venkatesh,et al.  How honeybees make grazing landings on flat surfaces , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance , 1997, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[25]  Maki K. Habib,et al.  The Pemex-B autonomous demining robot: perception and navigation strategies , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[26]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  A fly-locust based neuronal control system applied to an unmanned aerial vehicle: the invertebrate neuronal principles for course stabilization, altitude control and collision avoidance , 2007, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[27]  Boris I. Shraiman,et al.  Olfactory search at high Reynolds number , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  S. Bermudez i Badia,et al.  A collision avoidance model based on the Lobula giant movement detector (LGMD) neuron of the locust , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541).

[29]  Christophe Cox,et al.  Rats to the Rescue: Results of the First Tests on a Real Minefield , 2006 .

[30]  Maki K. Habib,et al.  Mine Clearance Techniques and Technologies for Effective Humanitarian Demining , 2002 .

[31]  R Hengstenberg,et al.  Dendritic structure and receptive-field organization of optic flow processing interneurons in the fly. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  J. Hildebrand,et al.  Local interneurons and information processing in the olfactory glomeruli of the moth Manduca sexta , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[33]  G. Laurent,et al.  Invariance of Angular Threshold Computation in a Wide-Field Looming-Sensitive Neuron , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Svetha Venkatesh,et al.  Robot navigation inspired by principles of insect vision , 1999, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[35]  T. Baker,et al.  Reiterative responses to single strands of odor promote sustained upwind flight and odor source location by moths. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  E. A. Arbas,et al.  Physiology and morphology of projection neurons in the antennal lobe of the male mothManduca sexta , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[37]  Ryohei Kanzaki,et al.  Synthesis of the pheromone-oriented behavior of silkworm moths by a mobile robot with moth antennae as pheromone sensors , 1999 .

[38]  Hidehito Nanto,et al.  Introduction to Chemosensors , 2004 .

[39]  J. Shaw,et al.  Can Honey Bees Assist in Area Reduction and Landmine Detection , 2003 .

[40]  Charles M Higgins,et al.  The computational basis of an identified neuronal circuit for elementary motion detection in dipterous insects. , 2004, Visual neuroscience.

[41]  A. Ludlow,et al.  A reappraisal of insect flight towards a distant point source of wind-borne odor , 1982, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[42]  T. Wyatt Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste , 2003 .

[43]  T. Baker,et al.  Latencies of behavioral response to interception of filaments of sex pheromone and clean air influence flight track shape in Heliothis virescens (F.) males , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[44]  C. Rowell,et al.  The orthopteran descending movement detector (DMD) neurones: a characterisation and review , 1971, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[45]  R. Johnston CHEMICAL COMMUNICATION IN RODENTS: FROM PHEROMONES TO INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION , 2003 .

[46]  John G. Hildebrand,et al.  Male-specific, sex pheromone-selective projection neurons in the antennal lobes of the mothManduca sexta , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[47]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  A Biologically Based Flight Control System for a Blimp-based UAV , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[48]  Giacomo Indiveri,et al.  Analog VLSI Model of Locust DCMD Neuron Response for Computation of Object Approach , 1998 .

[49]  Ryohei Kanzaki,et al.  Neural control mechanisms of the pheromone‐triggered programmed behavior in male silkmoths revealed by double‐labeling of descending interneurons and a motor neuron , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[50]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  A Biologically Based Chemo-Sensing UAV for Humanitarian Demining , 2007 .

[51]  Michael O'Shea,et al.  The anatomy and output connection of a locust visual interneurone; the lobular giant movement detector (LGMD) neurone , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[52]  H. Krapp,et al.  Spatial distribution of inputs and local receptive field properties of a wide-field, looming sensitive neuron. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  Zhengguo Zhu,et al.  Sensitivity gains in chemosensing by lasing action in organic polymers , 2005, Nature.

[54]  Holger G. Krapp,et al.  Wide-field, motion-sensitive neurons and matched filters for optic flow fields , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[55]  A. Ludlow,et al.  An analysis of anemotactic zigzagging flight in male moths stimulated by pheromone , 1978 .

[56]  J. Kennedy Zigzagging and casting as a programmed response to wind‐borne odour: a review , 1983 .

[57]  J. Murlis,et al.  Fine‐scale structure of odour plumes in relation to insect orientation to distant pheromone and other attractant sources , 1981 .

[58]  A. Dubs The spatial integration of signals in the retina and lamina of the fly compound eye under different conditions of luminance , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[59]  N. Franceschini,et al.  A Bio-Inspired Flying Robot Sheds Light on Insect Piloting Abilities , 2007, Current Biology.

[60]  H. T. Nagle,et al.  Handbook of Machine Olfaction , 2002 .

[61]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Collision avoidance using a model of the locust LGMD neuron , 2000, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[62]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  Purification and characterization of the major nonstructural protein (NS-1) of Aleutian mink disease parvovirus , 1995, Journal of virology.

[63]  A. Borst,et al.  Detecting visual motion: theory and models. , 1993, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[64]  Ian G. McLean,et al.  A Training Program for Filter-Search Mine Detection Dogs , 2002, International Journal of Comparative Psychology.

[65]  Martin Eickhoff,et al.  Electronics and sensors based on pyroelectric AlGaN/GaN heterostructures – Part B: Sensor applications , 2003 .

[66]  A. Borst,et al.  A look into the cockpit of the fly: visual orientation, algorithms, and identified neurons , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[67]  Steven Schofield,et al.  Flight behaviour of Cadra cautella males in rapidly pulsed pheromone plumes , 2002 .

[68]  Holger G. Krapp,et al.  Multiplication and stimulus invariance in a looming-sensitive neuron , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[69]  Michael H Dickinson,et al.  Collision-avoidance and landing responses are mediated by separate pathways in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[70]  C. David Compensation for height in the control of groundspeed byDrosophila in a new, ‘barber's pole’ wind tunnel , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[71]  M O'shea,et al.  The neuronal basis of a sensory analyser, the acridid movement detector system. II. response decrement, convergence, and the nature of the excitatory afferents to the fan-like dendrites of the LGMD. , 1976, The Journal of experimental biology.

[72]  N. Strausfeld Atlas of an Insect Brain , 1976, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[73]  Zhang,et al.  Honeybee navigation en route to the goal: visual flight control and odometry , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[74]  N. Strausfeld,et al.  Anatomical organization of retinotopic motion‐sensitive pathways in the optic lobes of flies , 2003, Microscopy research and technique.

[75]  T. Baker,et al.  Pheromone Source Location by Flying Moths: A Supplementary Non-Anemotactic Mechanism , 1982, Science.

[76]  José Barata,et al.  Unmanned helicopters applied to humanitarian demining , 2005, 2005 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation.

[77]  John Murtis,et al.  Odor Plumes and How Insects Use Them , 1992 .

[78]  P. Hardin,et al.  Survey of transcripts in the adult Drosophila brain , 2001, Genome Biology.

[79]  Jing Gu,et al.  An artificial moth: Chemical source localization using a robot based neuronal model of moth optomotor anemotactic search , 2006, Auton. Robots.

[80]  Claudio Bruschini,et al.  A Survey of Research on Sensor Technology for Landmine Detection , 1998 .

[81]  B. Hansson,et al.  Central processing of pulsed pheromone signals by antennal lobe neurons in the male moth Agrotis segetum. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[82]  C. P. Gooneratne,et al.  A Review of Sensing Technologies for Landmine Detection : Unmanned Vehicle Based Approach , 2004 .

[83]  Joachim Hertzberg,et al.  An autonomous mobile robot with a 3D laser range finder for 3D exploration and digitalization of indoor environments , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[84]  Robert M. Olberg,et al.  Pheromone-triggered flip-flopping interneurons in the ventral nerve cord of the silkworm moth,Bombyx mori , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[85]  R. Cardé,et al.  Orientation of male gypsy moths,Lymantria Dispar (L.), to pheromone sources: The role of olfactory and visual cues , 1990, Journal of Insect Behavior.