High quality queueing information from accelerated active network tomography

Monitoring network state can be crucial in Future Internet infrastructures. Passive monitoring of all the routers is expensive and prohibitive. Storing, accessing and sharing the data is a technological challenge among networks with conflicting economic interests. Active monitoring methods can be attractive alternatives as they are free from most of these issues. Here we demonstrate that it is possible to improve the active network tomography methodology to such extent that the quality of the extracted link or router level delay is comparable to the passively measurable information. We show that the temporal precision of the measurements and the performance of the data analysis should be simultaneously improved to achieve this goal. In this paper we not only introduce a new efficient message-passing based algorithm but we also show that it is applicable for data collected by the ETOMIC high precision active measurement infrastructure. The measurements are conducted in the GEANT2 high speed academic network connecting the sites, which is an ideal test ground for such Future Internet applications.

[1]  Y. Vardi,et al.  Network Tomography: Estimating Source-Destination Traffic Intensities from Link Data , 1996 .

[2]  G. Palla,et al.  Spectrum of stochastic evolution operators: local matrix representation approach. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[3]  Bin Yu,et al.  Maximum pseudo likelihood estimation in network tomography , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[4]  Ilkka Norros,et al.  On the Use of Fractional Brownian Motion in the Theory of Connectionless Networks , 1995, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[5]  Fouad A. Tobagi,et al.  Analysis of measured single-hop delay from an operational backbone network , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[6]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Multicast-based inference of network-internal loss characteristics , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Brendan J. Frey,et al.  Graphical Models for Machine Learning and Digital Communication , 1998 .

[8]  Walter Willinger,et al.  On the Self-Similar Nature of Ethernet Traffic ( extended version ) , 1995 .

[9]  Mikel Izal,et al.  The European Traffic Observatory Measurement Infrastructure (ETOMIC): a testbed for universal active and passive measurements , 2005, First International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the DEvelopment of NeTworks and COMmunities.

[10]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Multicast-based inference of network-internal delay distributions , 2002, TNET.

[11]  Péter Mátray,et al.  Results of Large-Scale Queueing Delay Tomography Performed in the ETOMIC Infrastructure , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[12]  István Csabai,et al.  Measuring the Dynamical State of the Internet: Large-Scale Network Tomography via the ETOMIC Infrastructure , 2006, Complexus.

[13]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[14]  Sarika Jalan,et al.  Random matrix analysis of localization properties of gene coexpression network. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Network tomography for internal delay estimation , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221).

[16]  Péter Mátray,et al.  Building a prototype for network measurement virtual observatory , 2007, MineNet '07.

[17]  Mikel Izal,et al.  On the influence of self-similarity on optical burst switching traffic , 2002, Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM '02. IEEE.

[18]  Brice Augustin,et al.  Avoiding traceroute anomalies with Paris traceroute , 2006, IMC '06.