Demand for ecolabeled seafood in the Japanese market: A conjoint analysis of the impact of information and interaction with other labels

The use of seafood ecolabels is expanding in the world marketplace, but so are labels indicating other product attributes, such as country of origin and wild vs. farmed. The interactive effects of these labels and attributes in evaluating consumers’ preferences for ecolabeled seafood are relatively unexplored. In this paper we investigate (1) the direct and interactive effects of seafood ecolabels with other common fish labels, and (2) how consumers’ perceptions about the state of marine stocks and the valuation of ecolabels may be affected by different information. We find moderate interactive effects between ecolabels and country of origin labels, whereas the valuation for seafood ecolabels is fairly high. In terms of information, we find that consumers’ perceptions about fish stock levels changed (negatively) after receiving information on declining stock levels, and more sensationalized information led to increased change. However, valuation for a seafood ecolabel increases only when the information was perceived positively (credible/interesting); whereas exaggerated information (which was also perceived less credible) had insignificant effects on WTP.

[1]  Shabbar Jaffry,et al.  Consumer choices for quality and sustainability labelled seafood products in the UK , 2004 .

[2]  Pratheesh O. Sudhakaran,et al.  CERTIFICATION OF SHRIMP AND SALMON FOR BEST AQUACULTURE PRACTICES: ASSESSING CONSUMER PREFERENCES IN RHODE ISLAND , 2012 .

[3]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[4]  R. Johnston,et al.  Assessing Consumer Preferences for Ecolabeled Seafood: The Influence of Species, Certifier, and Household Attributes , 1999 .

[5]  Oecd Indicators Education at a Glance 2007 , 2007 .

[6]  Dorothée Brécard,et al.  Determinants of demand for green products: An application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe , 2009 .

[7]  R. Johnston,et al.  A Battle of Taste and Environmental Convictions for Ecolabeled Seafood: A Contingent Ranking Experiment , 2006 .

[8]  Veerle Miranda Cooking, Caring and Volunteering: Unpaid Work Around the World , 2011 .

[9]  F. Asche,et al.  The Salmon Disease Crisis in Chile , 2009, Marine Resource Economics.

[10]  Dorothée Brécard,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Eco, Health and Fair Trade Labels. An Application to Seafood Product in France , 2012 .

[11]  Frank Asche,et al.  MEASURING CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR ECOLABELED SEAFOOD: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON , 2001 .

[12]  C. R. Wessells,et al.  Product certification and ecolabelling for fisheries sustainability , 2001 .

[13]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Rebuilding Global Fisheries , 2009, Science.

[14]  Iain Fraser,et al.  Model selection for the mixed logit with Bayesian estimation , 2009 .

[15]  Oecd Ocde Education At A Glance , 2005 .

[16]  D. McFadden,et al.  Does Local Labeling Complement or Compete with Other Sustainable Labels? A Conjoint Analysis of Direct and Joint Values for Fresh Produce Claim , 2011 .

[17]  Y. Perraudeau,et al.  Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization The Demand for Seafood Eco-Labels in France , 2011 .

[18]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[19]  Jason F. Shogren,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Food Irradiation: How Favorable and Unfavorable Descriptions Affect Preferences for Irradiated Pork in Experimental Auctions , 2002 .

[20]  Lori F. Pivarnik,et al.  Consumer perceptions about seafood – an Internet survey , 2008 .

[21]  T. Cameron,et al.  Updating Subjective Risks in the Presence of Conflicting Information: An Application to Climate Change , 2002 .

[22]  F. Norwood,et al.  Consumer Demand for a Ban on Antibiotic Drug Use in Pork Production , 2006 .

[23]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Posterior analysis of random taste coefficients in air travel behaviour modelling , 2007 .

[24]  E. Barbier,et al.  Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services , 2006, Science.