Product Line Design with Component Commonality and Cost-Reduction Effort

Market pressure for low prices paired with customer demand for high product variety presents a considerable dilemma for many manufacturers. Industry practice and research to date suggest that approaches based on component commonality can substantially lower the costs of proliferated product lines, but at the cost of reducing product differentiation and revenues. We analyze a stylized model of a manufacturer who designs a product line consisting of two products for sale to two market segments with different valuations of quality. The manufacturer determines the component quality levels, the amount of effort to reduce production costs, and whether to use common or different components for the two products. Explicitly considering potential interdependencies between cost-reduction effort and quality decisions, we characterize environments where the optimal product line involving component commonality features products of higher quality and yields higher revenues. Counter to earlier research we show that it can be preferable to make those components common that, relative to their production cost, are attributed a higher importance by customers. Disregarding the interactions between commonality, production cost, quality, and effort decisions can lead manufacturers to offer product lines with excessive differentiation and inefficiently low quality.

[1]  Lars Stole,et al.  Nonlinear Pricing and Oligopoly , 1995 .

[2]  Sudheer Gupta,et al.  Process Innovation, Product Differentiation, and Channel Structure: Strategic Incentives in a Duopoly , 1998 .

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Preyas S. Desai Quality Segmentation in Spatial Markets: When Does Cannibalization Affect Product Line Design? , 2001 .

[5]  K. Moorthy Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design , 1984 .

[6]  Kamalini Ramdas MANAGING PRODUCT VARIETY: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW AND RESEARCH DIRECTIONS , 2003 .

[7]  K. R. Baker,et al.  The Effect of Commonality on Safety Stock in a Simple Inventory Model , 1986 .

[8]  Xavier de Groote,et al.  Flexibility and marketing/manufacturing coordination , 1994 .

[9]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Effective Inventory and Service Management Through Product and Process Redesign , 1996, Oper. Res..

[10]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Differentiation and Commonality in Design: Balancing Revenue and Cost Drivers , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Kyle J. Mayer,et al.  Are Supply and Plant Inspections Complements or Substitutes? A Strategic and Operational Assessment of Inspection Practices in Biotechnology , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[12]  I. Png,et al.  Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions , 1992 .

[13]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: a Study of Automotive Braking Systems , 1999 .

[14]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Managing broader product lines through delayed differentiation using vanilla boxes , 1998 .

[15]  R. Acharyya,et al.  Process and Product Innovation: Complementarity in a Vertically Differentiated Monopoly with Discrete Consumer Types , 2004 .

[16]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  The Impact of an Integrated Marketing and Manufacturing Innovation , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[17]  J. Miguel Villas-Boas,et al.  Oligopoly with Asymmetric Information: Differentiation in Credit Markets , 1999 .

[18]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[19]  LevinthalDaniel,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution , 2001 .

[20]  M Williams,et al.  Managing Quality , 2018 .

[21]  Dilip Chhajed,et al.  Commonality in product design: Cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Giacomo Bonanno,et al.  Intensity of competition and the choice between product and process innovation , 1998 .

[23]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan Enabling Customization Using Standardized Operations , 2001 .

[24]  Luca Lambertini,et al.  Process and product innovation in a vertically differentiated monopoly , 2000 .

[25]  D. Mowery,et al.  Process Innovation and Learning by Doing in Semiconductor Manufacturing , 1998 .

[26]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Design for Postponement , 2003, Supply Chain Management.