Earthquake response of slender planar concrete walls with modern detailing

Abstract Reinforced concrete structural walls are used commonly as the primary lateral-load resisting system in buildings. The research presented here represents the results of the first phase of a multi-year research effort aimed at developing tools to enable performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) of structural walls. The first phase of the research effort focused on the seismic behavior and analysis of slender planar walls and included laboratory testing of four planar wall sub-assemblages. The walls simulated the bottom three stories of a 10-story prototype building; loading apparatus available at the University of Illinois, Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation laboratory were used to simulate the load demands, permitting maximum test-specimen scale and realistic demand patterns. The walls were detailed to modern code requirements and standard practice and included heavily reinforced boundary elements. The test matrix studied the effects of reinforcement layout, shear demand, and lap splices at the base of the wall. All of the walls exhibited damage in the compression region, even at relatively low drifts. The splice affected the location of the damage. Walls without splices sustained damage at the base of the wall; walls with splices sustained damage at both the top of the splice and the base of the wall, with the critical region depending on the shear demand. Shear demand also affected response; a moderate increase in shear demand resulted in the failure mechanism changing from bar fracture to flexure–compression failure of the boundary elements.

[1]  A. Ghobarah,et al.  BEHAVIOUR OF REHABILITATED STRUCTURAL WALLS , 2005 .

[2]  Denis Mitchell,et al.  SEISMIC RETROFIT OF SHEAR WALLS WITH HEADED BARS AND CARBON FIBER WRAP , 2003 .

[3]  Michael D. Kotsovos,et al.  Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls: Strength, Deformation Characteristics, and Failure Mechanism , 1990 .

[4]  Katrin Beyer,et al.  Quasi-static cyclic tests and plastic hinge analysis of RC structural walls , 2009 .

[5]  A A Tasnimi Strength and deformation of mid-rise shear walls under load reversal , 2000 .

[6]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Cyclic Behavior of RC Cantilever Walls, Part I: Experimental Results , 1995 .

[7]  Dawn E. Lehman,et al.  Investigation of the Seismic Behavior and Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls Using the UIUC NEES Facility , 2007 .

[8]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  "BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (ACI 318-11) AND COMMENTARY" , 2011 .

[9]  Anna C. Birely,et al.  Seismic Performance of Slender Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls , 2013 .

[10]  Mohamed Mohamed Ebrahim Elnady,et al.  Seismic Rehabilitation of RC Structural Walls , 2008 .

[11]  Michael D. Kotsovos,et al.  STRENGTH AND DEFORMATION CHARACTERISTICS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE WALLS UNDER LOAD REVERSALS , 1990 .

[12]  A E Fiorato,et al.  Earthquake resistant structural walls: Test of walls with and without openings , 1981 .

[13]  N. Null Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .

[14]  Sang Whan Han,et al.  Effect of boundary element details on the seismic deformation capacity of structural walls , 2002 .

[15]  Ezio Giuriani,et al.  Cyclic behaviour of a full scale RC structural wall , 2003 .

[16]  James L Noland,et al.  Computer-Aided Structural Engineering (CASE) Project: Decision Logic Table Formulation of ACI (American Concrete Institute) 318-77 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete for Automated Constraint Processing. Volume 1. , 1986 .