The mass transport mechanisms during cross-flow ultrafiltration (UF) are mathematically expressed using the two-dimensional convective diffusion equation where the axial diffusion term is neglected for an axial Peclet number much greater than the transverse Peclet number. A numerical scheme is presented to solve the steady-state two-dimensional convective diffusion equation for the case of known uniform permeate flux. However, in the actual cross-flow UF process, the permeate flux along the axial direction is unknown and usually decreases with axial distance. Therefore, an iterative algorithm is developed to predict the steady-state permeate flux based on the assumption that the concentration at membrane surface cannot exceed a certain limiting value. Using the numerical model with an effective diffusion coefficient, which is considered to be the sum of molecular diffusion and shear-induced hydrodynamic diffusion coefficients, the effects of particle size, feed concentration, and axial velocity on the steady-state permeate flux were investigated.
[1]
G. Pinder,et al.
Numerical solution of partial differential equations in science and engineering
,
1982
.
[2]
Anthony G. Fane,et al.
Ultrafiltration of suspensions
,
1984
.
[3]
C. Gooding,et al.
A dynamic model for low‐pressure, hollow‐fiber ultrafiltration
,
1985
.
[4]
Robert H. Davis,et al.
Global model of crossflow microfiltration based on hydrodynamic particle diffusion
,
1988
.
[5]
A. S. Berman.
Laminar Flow in Channels with Porous Walls
,
1953
.
[6]
G. Green,et al.
Fouling of ultrafiltration membranes: lateral migration and the particle trajectory model
,
1980
.