Assessing clarity of message communication for mandated USEPA drinking water quality reports.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency mandates that community water systems (CWSs), or drinking water utilities, provide annual consumer confidence reports (CCRs) reporting on water quality, compliance with regulations, source water, and consumer education. While certain report formats are prescribed, there are no criteria ensuring that consumers understand messages in these reports. To assess clarity of message, trained raters evaluated a national sample of 30 CCRs using the Centers for Disease Control Clear Communication Index (Index) indices: (1) Main Message/Call to Action; (2) Language; (3) Information Design; (4) State of the Science; (5) Behavioral Recommendations; (6) Numbers; and (7) Risk. Communication materials are considered qualifying if they achieve a 90% Index score. Overall mean score across CCRs was 50 ± 14% and none scored 90% or higher. CCRs did not differ significantly by water system size. State of the Science (3 ± 15%) and Behavioral Recommendations (77 ± 36%) indices were the lowest and highest, respectively. Only 63% of CCRs explicitly stated if the water was safe to drink according to federal and state standards and regulations. None of the CCRs had passing Index scores, signaling that CWSs are not effectively communicating with their consumers; thus, the Index can serve as an evaluation tool for CCR effectiveness and a guide to improve water quality communications.

[1]  B J D'Arcy,et al.  The restoration of Loch Leven, Scotland, UK. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  Andrea M. Dietrich,et al.  Tale of two isomers: complexities of human odor perception for cis- and trans-4-methylcyclohexane methanol from the chemical spill in West Virginia. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Steve E. Hrudey,et al.  Detection of Odour and Health Risk Perception of Drinking Water , 1999 .

[4]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Communicating environmental health risks: Using the doctor-patient model , 1989 .

[5]  James J. Huntzicker Editorial. Science, information, and society , 1980 .

[6]  A. Dietrich Aesthetic issues for drinking water. , 2006, Journal of water and health.

[7]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Risk communication and the social amplification of risk , 1991 .

[8]  M. Wolf,et al.  Low literacy impairs comprehension of prescription drug warning labels , 2006, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  William T Foreman,et al.  Determination of (4-methylcyclohexyl)methanol isomers by heated purge-and-trap GC/MS in water samples from the 2014 Elk River, West Virginia, chemical spill. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[10]  Nancy Meyer-Emerick Are we answering the right questions? Improving CCR communication , 2004 .

[11]  Charles W. Berberich Consumer confidence reports: challenge and opportunity , 1998 .

[12]  Ragnar E. Löfstedt,et al.  The Earthscan Reader in Risk and Modern Society , 1998 .

[13]  Nasandra Wright,et al.  Self-Reported Household Impacts of Large-Scale Chemical Contamination of the Public Water Supply, Charleston, West Virginia, USA , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  Anne L. Spiesman,et al.  Manager to Manager -- Using the CCR to Talk to Your Public (PDF) , 2002 .

[15]  Katherine Phetxumphou,et al.  Systematic tracking, visualizing, and interpreting of consumer feedback for drinking water quality. , 2014, Water research.

[16]  Michael K. Paasche-Orlow,et al.  The prevalence of limited health literacy , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[17]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[18]  J. Schnoor,et al.  Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  C.R.I. Clayton,et al.  Risk communication of hazardous processes associated with drinking water quality - a mental models approach to customer perception, part 1 - a methodology , 1999 .

[20]  Andrea M Dietrich,et al.  Assessing human exposure and odor detection during showering with crude 4-(methylcyclohexyl)methanol (MCHM) contaminated drinking water. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  Paul W. De Vore Technological Literacy and Social Purpose. , 1992 .

[22]  J. Alan Roberson,et al.  Electronic delivery of consumer confidence reports , 2013 .

[23]  Andrea M Dietrich,et al.  Critical review and rethinking of USEPA secondary standards for maintaining organoleptic quality of drinking water. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Katherine Phetxumphou,et al.  An evaluation of the readability of drinking water quality reports: a national assessment. , 2015, Journal of water and health.

[25]  John Manuel Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication: Lessons from the Elk River Spill , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[26]  Cynthia Baur,et al.  The CDC Clear Communication Index Is a New Evidence-Based Tool to Prepare and Review Health Information , 2014, Health promotion practice.

[27]  Edward G. Means Drinking water quality in the new millennium: The risk of underestimating public perception , 2002 .

[28]  Miguel de França Doria,et al.  Factors influencing public perception of drinking water quality. , 2010 .

[29]  Sara J. Rosenbaum,et al.  Low Health Literacy: Implications for National Health Policy , 2007 .

[30]  Crystel C. Montecinos,et al.  Nevada's CWS Managers assess the CCRs , 2002 .

[31]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  COMMUNICATING RISK TO THE PUBLIC , 1992 .

[32]  Bojinka Bishop Water utility communication practicesWHAT CONTRIBUTES TO SUCCESS , 2003 .