Clinical experience of the importance of daily portal imaging for head and neck IMRT treatments

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient setup in head and neck IMRT using daily portal imaging. At our institution, orthogonal digital portal images are taken daily to check patient positioning prior to head and neck IMRT treatment. Isocenter misalignments are corrected using a couch shift (3 mm action level). Therapists also compare the DRRs and portal images looking at points more distant from the isocenter, particularly in the supraclavicular region, and re‐position the patient's shoulders in the mask if considered necessary. The daily isocenter shifts (C2 region) and frequency of patient repositioning were investigated by review of record‐and‐verify records for 15 patients. The magnitude of the shoulder repositioning was evaluated for 10 of these patients by comparing portal images and plan DRRs for a point 8 cm inferior of isocenter (T2‐T4). For all patients, pretreatment isocenter discrepancies 3 mm or smaller were recorded for a median of 92.5% of fractions (range: 71.4 – 100%). Patients were repositioned in the immobilization mask before treatment for a median of 14% of fractions (3–34%). Thirty percent of these were for shoulder shifts of 1 cm or larger. Twenty percent of patients needed shoulder shifts of 1 cm or more for more than 7/35 fractions, meaning that without setup based on daily imaging, parts of the CTV would have received less than 95% of the prescribed dose. In conclusion, with our current immobilization, isocenter positioning accuracy is excellent, while correct shoulder position is more variable, particularly for a small subset of patients. Frequent imaging of head and neck IMRT patients is essential to accurate delivery of therapy, with shoulder position an important factor. PACS number: 87.53.Oq

[1]  A L McKenzie,et al.  How should breathing motion be combined with other errors when drawing margins around clinical target volumes? , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Errors and margins in radiotherapy. , 2004, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[3]  Henk Huizenga,et al.  Set-up improvement in head and neck radiotherapy using a 3D off-line EPID-based correction protocol and a customised head and neck support. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  Alessandra Bolsi,et al.  Three-dimensional conformal vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer patients: comparative analysis of dosimetric and technical parameters. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  J C Stroom,et al.  Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Arjan Bel,et al.  Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Stanley J. Rosenthal,et al.  Intra- and interfractional patient motion for a variety of immobilization devices. , 2005, Medical physics.

[8]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  V Grégoire,et al.  Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  A Region-of-Interest Analysis of Setup Uncertainties in Head and Neck Radiotherapy , 2005 .

[11]  Ping Xia,et al.  Repeat CT imaging and replanning during the course of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  M van Herk,et al.  The width of margins in radiotherapy treatment plans. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  K. Chao,et al.  Patterns of Failure in Patients Receiving Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Head and Neck Cancer , 2005 .

[14]  D. Brizel,et al.  Comparison of two head and neck immobilization systems. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  D. Kraus,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck rhabdomyosarcoma. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  O Jäkel,et al.  Three-dimensional accuracy and interfractional reproducibility of patient fixation and positioning using a stereotactic head mask system. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Bill J Salter,et al.  Repositioning accuracy of a commercially available thermoplastic mask system. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  D. Payne,et al.  Randomized trial on two types of thermoplastic masks for patient immobilization during radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  D. Verellen,et al.  Six dimensional analysis with daily stereoscopic x-ray imaging of intrafraction patient motion in head and neck treatments using five points fixation masks. , 2006, Medical physics.