Computer-assisted semen analysis parameters as predictors for fertility of men from the general population. The Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team.

The predictive value of sperm motility parameters obtained by computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) was evaluated for the fertility of men from general population. In a prospective study with couples stopping use of contraception in order to try to conceive, CASA was performed on semen samples from 358 men. A recently developed CASA system, Copenhagen Rigshospitalet Image house sperm Motility Analysis System (CRISMAS) was used for assessment of motility parameters. This system has an editing function which allows correction of tracks made by the computer. Probably due to this function, the concentration assessment made by CRISMAS was very close to that made by the technician (median difference <5%) in all concentration ranges. Correlation between CASA parameters and fertility of normal couples (measured as probability of achieving pregnancy) was examined by the Cox regression model. In univariate models ln(sperm concentration) [beta = 0.331, risk ratio (RR) = 1.392, P = 0.0001], ln(total sperm count) (beta = 0.252, RR = 1.286, P = 0.0007) and percentage motile spermatozoa (beta = 0.014, RR = 1.014, P = 0.0004) were most significant predictors for fertility. In a multivariate analysis ln(sperm concentration) (beta = 0.268, RR = 1.307, P = 0.0016) and percentage motile spermatozoa (beta = 0.010, RR = 1.010, P = 0.011) but even more significantly the combined parameter, ln(concentration of motile spermatozoa) (beta = 0.329, RR = 1.389, P = 0.0001), were the only parameters of predictive value for fertility of men in the general population. In conclusion, these parameters obtained by CASA measurements can be used for prediction of fertility potential in normal men. This appears to be the first study showing the value of CASA in prediction of fertility in the general male population.

[1]  R. P. Oates,et al.  Computer-aided semen analysis variables as predictors of male fertility potential. , 1994, Archives of andrology.

[2]  A. Lenzi Computer-aided semen analysis (CASA) 10 years later: a test-bed for the European scientific andrological community. , 1997, International journal of andrology.

[3]  David Mortimer,et al.  Practical Laboratory Andrology , 1994 .

[4]  S. Mortimer,et al.  Effect of image sampling frequency on established and smoothing-independent kinematic values of capacitating human spermatozoa. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[5]  T. K. Jensen,et al.  A follow-up study of environmental and biologic determinants of fertility among 430 Danish first-pregnancy planners: design and methods. , 1998, Reproductive toxicology.

[6]  I D Cooke,et al.  Prognostic significance of computerized motility analysis for in vivo fertility. , 1993, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  F. Comhaire Consensus workshop on advanced diagnostic andrology techniques. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[8]  R. Aitken,et al.  A prospective study of the relationship between semen quality and fertility in cases of unexplained infertility. , 1984, Journal of andrology.

[9]  T. Cooper News from the European Academy of Andrology (EAA). , 1996, International journal of andrology.

[10]  D. Irvine,et al.  Andrology: A prospective clinical study of the relationship between the computer-assisted assessment of human semen quality and the achievement of pregnancy in vivo , 1994 .

[11]  W. Krause Computer-assisted semen analysis systems: comparison with routine evaluation and prognostic value in male fertility and assisted reproduction. , 1995, Human reproduction.