Fundamental Structures in Dynamic Communication Networks

In this paper I introduce a framework for modeling temporal communication networks and dynamical processes unfolding on such networks. The framework originates from the realization that there is a meaningful division of temporal communication networks into six dynamic classes, where the class of a network is determined by its generating process. In particular, each class is characterized by a fundamental structure: a temporal-topological network motif, which corresponds to the network representation of communication events in that class of network. These fundamental structures constrain network configurations: only certain configurations are possible within a dynamic class. In this way the framework presented here highlights strong constraints on network structures, which simplify analyses and shape network flows. Therefore the fundamental structures hold the potential to impact how we model temporal networks overall. I argue below that networks within the same class can be meaningfully compared, and modeled using similar techniques, but that integrating statistics across networks belonging to separate classes is not meaningful in general. This paper presents a framework for how to analyze networks in general, rather than a particular result of analyzing a particular dataset. I hope, however, that readers interested in modeling temporal networks will find the ideas and discussion useful in spite of the paper's more conceptual nature.

[1]  H. Geiger,et al.  On a Diffuse Reflection of the $ \alpha $-Particles , 1909 .

[2]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  From seconds to months: an overview of multi-scale dynamics of mobile telephone calls , 2015, The European Physical Journal B.

[3]  Vito Latora,et al.  Simplicial models of social contagion , 2018, Nature Communications.

[4]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Missing and spurious interactions and the reconstruction of complex networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Petter Holme,et al.  Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium , 2015, The European Physical Journal B.

[7]  Bo Edvardsson,et al.  Service Excellence in Management: Interdisciplinary Contributions , 2004 .

[8]  Sune Lehmann,et al.  Constrained information flows in temporal networks reveal intermittent communities , 2017, Physical review. E.

[9]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Intelligent Agents for Automated One-to-Many E-Commerce Negotiation , 2002, ACSC.

[10]  M. Newman,et al.  Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks , 2008, Nature.

[11]  Chiara Orsini,et al.  Quantifying randomness in real networks , 2015, Nature Communications.

[12]  Piotr Sapiezynski,et al.  Measuring Large-Scale Social Networks with High Resolution , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  Andrea Baronchelli,et al.  Quantifying the effect of temporal resolution on time-varying networks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Taro Takaguchi,et al.  Randomized reference models for temporal networks , 2018, SIAM Rev..

[15]  Arkadiusz Stopczynski,et al.  Fundamental structures of dynamic social networks , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Arkadiusz Stopczynski,et al.  Optimizing targeted vaccination across cyber–physical networks: an empirically based mathematical simulation study , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[17]  Alain Barrat,et al.  Simplicial Activity Driven Model. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[18]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal motifs reveal homophily, gender-specific patterns, and group talk in call sequences , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Miguel Rio,et al.  Likelihood-based assessment of dynamic networks , 2016, J. Complex Networks.

[20]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  An Impossibility Theorem for Clustering , 2002, NIPS.

[21]  Hans Geiger,et al.  The Scattering of the α -Particles by Matter , 1910 .

[22]  R. Tsien,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2022 .

[23]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Jon Crowcroft,et al.  Building shared trees using a one-to-many joining mechanism , 1997, CCRV.

[25]  Hans Geiger,et al.  On the Scattering of the α -Particles by Matter , 1908 .

[26]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  The link prediction problem for social networks , 2003, CIKM '03.

[27]  Sanjeev Kumar Sharma,et al.  Survey and analysis of temporal link prediction in online social networks , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI).

[28]  Klaus Bruhn Jensen,et al.  The internet as a cultural forum: Implications for research , 2011, New Media Soc..

[29]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The link-prediction problem for social networks , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  John H. Miller,et al.  Complex adaptive systems - an introduction to computational models of social life , 2009, Princeton studies in complexity.

[31]  Kimmo Kaski,et al.  Correlated Dynamics in Egocentric Communication Networks , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  Linyuan Lu,et al.  Link Prediction in Complex Networks: A Survey , 2010, ArXiv.

[33]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Effects of time window size and placement on the structure of an aggregated communication network , 2012, EPJ Data Science.

[34]  Julie Fournet,et al.  Data on face-to-face contacts in an office building suggest a low-cost vaccination strategy based on community linkers , 2014, Network Science.

[35]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  From seconds to months: multi-scale dynamics of mobile telephone calls , 2015, ArXiv.

[36]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  A Guide to Temporal Networks , 2016, Series on Complexity Science.

[37]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.