Evolution of eusociality and the soldier caste in termites: Influence of intraspecific competition and accelerated inheritance

We present new hypotheses and report experimental evidence for powerful selective forces impelling the evolution of both eusociality and the soldier caste in termites. Termite ancestors likely had a nesting and developmental life history similar to that of the living family Termopsidae, in which foraging does not occur outside the host wood, and nonsoldier helpers retain lifelong options for differentiation into reproductives. A local neighborhood of families that live exclusively within a limited resource results in interactions between conspecific colonies, high mortality of founding reproductives, and opportunities for accelerated inheritance of the nest and population by offspring that differentiate into nondispersing neotenic reproductives. In addition, fertile reproductive soldiers, a type of neotenic previously considered rare and docile, frequently develop in this intraspecific competitive context. They can be highly aggressive in subsequent interactions, supporting the hypothesis that intercolonial battles influenced the evolution of modern sterile termite soldier weaponry and behaviors.

[1]  P. Sherman,et al.  The Biology of the Naked Mole-Rat , 2017 .

[2]  J. Traniello,et al.  Comparative social biology of basal taxa of ants and termites. , 2003, Annual review of entomology.

[3]  M. Haverty,et al.  Longevity of kings and queens and first time of production of fertile progeny in dampwood termite (Isoptera; Termopsidae; Zootermopsis) colonies with different reproductive structures , 2002 .

[4]  B. Crespi,et al.  The evolution of soldier reproduction in social thrips , 2002 .

[5]  P. Eggleton.  Termites and trees: a review of recent advances in termite phylogenetics , 2001, Insectes Sociaux.

[6]  F. Weissing,et al.  Towards a unified theory of cooperative breeding: the role of ecology and life history re-examined , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Stefano Turillazzi,et al.  Unrelated helpers in a social insect , 2000, Nature.

[8]  J. Duffy,et al.  MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF EUSOCIALITY AMONG SPONGE‐DWELLING SHRIMPS (SYNALPHEUS) , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  Y. Roisin.  Philopatric reproduction, a prime mover in the evolution of termite sociality? , 1999, Insectes Sociaux.

[10]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  Social queuing in animal societies: a dynamic model of reproductive skew , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  J. H. Hunt.  TRAIT MAPPING AND SALIENCE IN THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIAL VESPID WASPS , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  A. Maxmen,et al.  Disease resistance: a benefit of sociality in the dampwood termite Zootermopsis angusticollis (Isoptera: Termopsidae) , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  L. Packer,et al.  The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids , 1998 .

[14]  L. Keller.  Queen lifespan and colony characteristics in ants and termites , 1998, Insectes Sociaux.

[15]  B. L. Thorne.  Evolution of Eusociality in Termites , 1997 .

[16]  L. Passera,et al.  Origin of ant soldiers , 1996, Nature.

[17]  J. Duffy,et al.  Eusociality in a coral-reef shrimp , 1996, Nature.

[18]  L. Keller.  Social evolution in ants , 1996 .

[19]  W. Tschinkel,et al.  Density-Dependent Competition in Fire Ants: Effects on Colony Survivorship and Size Variation , 1995 .

[20]  B. Crespi,et al.  Three conditions for the evolution of eusociality: Are they sufficient? , 1994, Insectes Sociaux.

[21]  J. Shellman-Reeve.  Limited nutrients in a dampwood termite: nest preference, competition and cooperative nest defence , 1994 .

[22]  Y. Roisin.  Intragroup Conflicts and the Evolution of Sterile Castes in Termites , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[23]  J. H. Hunt,et al.  Nourishment And Evolution In Insect Societies , 1994 .

[24]  Bernard J. Crespi,et al.  Eusociality in Australian gall thrips , 1992, Nature.

[25]  J. Simpson,et al.  Eusociality in the beetleAustroplatypus incompertus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) , 1992, Naturwissenschaften.

[26]  C. Noirot.  Social structure in termite societies , 1989 .

[27]  J. Pasteels,et al.  Ontogenetic development and evolution of the worker caste in termites , 1987, Experientia.

[28]  M. Andersson.  The Evolution of Eusociality , 1984 .

[29]  S. H. Bartz,et al.  Evolution of eusociality in termites. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  S. F. Light.  The Determination of the Castes of Social Insects (Concluded) , 1943, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[32]  安部 琢哉,et al.  Termites: Evolution, Sociality, Symbioses, Ecology , 2000, Springer Netherlands.

[33]  C. Slobodchikoff.  The ecology of social behavior , 1988 .

[34]  T. Myles.  Reproductive soldiers in the Termopsidae (Isoptera) , 1986 .

[35]  N. Pierce.  Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.