The `adequate' design of ethnographic outputs for practice: some explorations of the characteristics of design resources

AbstractThe community of `appliance design' rests generally upon a successful use of multidisciplinary user-centred design and often draws on an ethnographic component. Much has been made of the need for a multidisciplinary team and of the difficulties of making good use of ethnographic outputs in such a team. Discussions often centre upon the precise placement of the boundary between ethnography and design and the possibilities of hybridisation of these disciplines. Another way of looking at the issues of multidisciplinary teams is to look at the nature of the representational devices used to encapsulate and aid the communication of the ethnographic work in coherent and useful ways. Taking lessons from existing design practice, we look at how such representational devices actually work and propose some possible features important in the realisation of future best practice.

[1]  Scott Lewis,et al.  Ethnographic data for product development: a collaborative process , 1996, INTR.

[2]  David J. Gilmore Understanding and overcoming resistance to ethnographic design research , 2002, INTR.

[3]  Kenneth T. Anderson,et al.  D ESIGN M ANAGEMENT J OURNAL Design Ethnography , 1999 .

[4]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Bridging the analysis of work practice and system redesign in cooperative workshops , 1997, DIS '97.

[5]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Technomethodology: paradoxes and possibilities , 1996, CHI.

[6]  W. Sharrock,et al.  The Organizational Accountability of Technological Work , 1998 .

[7]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[8]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Designing with ethnography: a presentation framework for design , 1997, DIS '97.

[9]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design , 1994, CSCW '94.

[10]  David B. Martin,et al.  Applying patterns of cooperative interaction to work (re)design: e-government and planning , 2002, CHI.

[11]  Thomas Erickson,et al.  Workplace Studies: Supporting interdisciplinary design: towards pattern languages for workplaces , 2000 .

[12]  Graham Button,et al.  The relevance of “work-practice” for design , 1995 .

[13]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Workplace Studies: Situating workplace studies within the human-computer interaction field , 2000 .

[14]  G. Button The ethnographic tradition and design , 2000 .