Sensitive and adaptable pharmacological control of CAR T cells through extracellular receptor dimerization.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have achieved promising outcomes in several cancers, however more challenging oncology indications may necessitate advanced antigen receptor designs and functions. Here we describe a bipartite receptor system comprised of separate antigen targeting and signal transduction polypeptides, each containing an extracellular dimerization domain. We demonstrate that T cell activation remains antigen dependent but can only be achieved in the presence of a dimerizing drug, rapamycin. Studies performed in vitro and in xenograft mouse models illustrate equivalent to superior anti-tumor potency compared to currently used CAR designs, and at rapamycin concentrations well below immunosuppressive levels. We further show that the extracellular positioning of the dimerization domains enables the administration of recombinant re-targeting modules, potentially extending antigen targeting. Overall, this novel regulatable CAR design has exquisite drug sensitivity, provides robust anti-tumor responses, and is uniquely flexible for multiplex antigen targeting or retargeting, which may further assist the development of safe, potent and durable T cell therapeutics.

[1]  Yong Gu Lee,et al.  Use of a Single CAR T Cell and Several Bispecific Adapters Facilitates Eradication of Multiple Antigenically Different Solid Tumors. , 2018, Cancer research.

[2]  Elvira Khialeeva,et al.  Switchable control over in vivo CAR T expansion, B cell depletion, and induction of memory , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  M. Beibel,et al.  TORC1 inhibition enhances immune function and reduces infections in the elderly , 2018, Science Translational Medicine.

[4]  Ling Xu,et al.  T cell senescence and CAR-T cell exhaustion in hematological malignancies , 2018, Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

[5]  James J. Collins,et al.  Universal Chimeric Antigen Receptors for Multiplexed and Logical Control of T Cell Responses , 2018, Cell.

[6]  R. Morgan,et al.  Effective Targeting of Multiple B-Cell Maturation Antigen-Expressing Hematological Malignances by Anti-B-Cell Maturation Antigen Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells. , 2018, Human Gene Therapy.

[7]  Hans Bitter,et al.  Determinants of response and resistance to CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[8]  Omkar U. Kawalekar,et al.  CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer , 2018, Science.

[9]  E. Jaffe,et al.  Sequential loss of tumor surface antigens following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma , 2018, Haematologica.

[10]  K. Davis,et al.  Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B‐Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Mithat Gonen,et al.  Long‐Term Follow‐up of CD19 CAR Therapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  A. Kamphorst,et al.  CD8 T Cell Exhaustion in Chronic Infection and Cancer: Opportunities for Interventions. , 2018, Annual review of medicine.

[13]  S. Riddell,et al.  Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: Challenges to Bench-to-Bedside Efficacy , 2018, The Journal of Immunology.

[14]  B. Badie,et al.  Chimeric Antigen Receptors T Cell Therapy in Solid Tumor: Challenges and Clinical Applications , 2017, Front. Immunol..

[15]  J. Steinbach,et al.  Retargeting of UniCAR T cells with an in vivo synthesized target module directed against CD19 positive tumor cells , 2017, Oncotarget.

[16]  Stephen J. Schuster,et al.  Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Refractory B‐Cell Lymphomas , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Levy,et al.  Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T‐Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B‐Cell Lymphoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Koichi Araki,et al.  EFFECTOR CD8 T CELLS DEDIFFERENTIATE INTO LONG-LIVED MEMORY CELLS , 2017, Nature.

[19]  M. Wurfel,et al.  Endothelial Activation and Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in Neurotoxicity after Adoptive Immunotherapy with CD19 CAR-T Cells. , 2017, Cancer discovery.

[20]  S. Grupp,et al.  Cellular kinetics of CTL019 in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2017, Blood.

[21]  D. Maloney,et al.  Infectious complications of CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell immunotherapy. , 2017, Blood.

[22]  Wei-Chun Chang,et al.  Regulated Expansion and Survival of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells Using Small Molecule-Dependent Inducible MyD88/CD40. , 2017, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[23]  P. Knolle,et al.  TCF1+ hepatitis C virus-specific CD8+ T cells are maintained after cessation of chronic antigen stimulation , 2017, Nature Communications.

[24]  M. Maus,et al.  Catch me if you can: Leukemia Escape after CD19-Directed T Cell Immunotherapies , 2016, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[25]  J. Khan,et al.  CD19 CAR immune pressure induces B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia lineage switch exposing inherent leukaemic plasticity , 2016, Nature Communications.

[26]  D. Maloney,et al.  Acquisition of a CD19-negative myeloid phenotype allows immune escape of MLL-rearranged B-ALL from CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy. , 2016, Blood.

[27]  Brian Keith,et al.  Distinct Signaling of Coreceptors Regulates Specific Metabolism Pathways and Impacts Memory Development in CAR T Cells. , 2016, Immunity.

[28]  Yu Cao,et al.  Switch-mediated activation and retargeting of CAR-T cells for B-cell malignancies , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Chan Hyuk Kim,et al.  Versatile strategy for controlling the specificity and activity of engineered T cells , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Alan Maréchal,et al.  Design of chimeric antigen receptors with integrated controllable transient functions , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Z. Eshhar,et al.  Therapeutic Potential of T Cell Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CARs) in Cancer Treatment: Counteracting Off-Tumor Toxicities for Safe CAR T Cell Therapy. , 2016, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[32]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Remote control of therapeutic T cells through a small molecule–gated chimeric receptor , 2015, Science.

[33]  S. A. Arriola Apelo,et al.  Alternative rapamycin treatment regimens mitigate the impact of rapamycin on glucose homeostasis and the immune system , 2015, Aging cell.

[34]  A. Scharenberg,et al.  Efficient modification of CCR5 in primary human hematopoietic cells using a megaTAL nuclease and AAV donor template , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[35]  E. Wherry,et al.  Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion , 2015, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[36]  R. Kaplan,et al.  4-1BB Costimulation Ameliorates T Cell Exhaustion Induced by Tonic Signaling of Chimeric Antigen Receptors , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[37]  D. Powell,et al.  A universal strategy for adoptive immunotherapy of cancer through use of a novel T-cell antigen receptor. , 2012, Cancer research.

[38]  H. Park,et al.  High Cleavage Efficiency of a 2A Peptide Derived from Porcine Teschovirus-1 in Human Cell Lines, Zebrafish and Mice , 2011, PloS one.

[39]  M. Ford,et al.  Paradoxical Aspects of Rapamycin Immunobiology in Transplantation , 2011, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[40]  D. Campana,et al.  Chimeric receptors containing CD137 signal transduction domains mediate enhanced survival of T cells and increased antileukemic efficacy in vivo. , 2009, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[41]  A. Thomson,et al.  Immunoregulatory functions of mTOR inhibition , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[42]  H. Yoon,et al.  FKBP Family Proteins: Immunophilins with Versatile Biological Functions , 2008, Neurosignals.

[43]  T. Wandless,et al.  The Rapamycin-binding Domain of the Protein Kinase Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Is a Destabilizing Domain* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  B. Law,et al.  Rapamycin: an anti-cancer immunosuppressant? , 2005, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[45]  Corey W. Liu,et al.  Characterization of the FKBP.rapamycin.FRB ternary complex. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[46]  J. Morales,et al.  Sirolimus steady-state trough concentrations are not affected by bolus methylprednisolone therapy in renal allograft recipients. , 2002, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[47]  B. Kreider,et al.  Drug receptor identification from multiple tissues using cellular-derived mRNA display libraries. , 2002, Chemistry & biology.

[48]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Inducible gene expression and protein translocation using nontoxic ligands identified by a mammalian three-hybrid screen. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Stuart L. Schreiber,et al.  Structure of the FKBP12-Rapamycin Complex Interacting with Binding Domain of Human FRAP , 1996, Science.

[50]  R. Yatscoff,et al.  Rapamycin: Distribution, Pharmacokinetics, and Therapeutic Range Investigations , 1995, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[51]  S. Ettenberg,et al.  Abstract B105: ACTR707: a novel T-cell therapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD20+ B cell lymphoma in combination with rituximab , 2018 .

[52]  Kristen N. Pollizzi,et al.  Regulation of T cells by mTOR: the known knowns and the known unknowns. , 2015, Trends in immunology.

[53]  K. Stankunas,et al.  Rapamycin analogs with differential binding specificity permit orthogonal control of protein activity. , 2006, Chemistry & biology.

[54]  M. Metcalfe,et al.  Rapamycin in transplantation: a review of the evidence. , 2001, Kidney international.