Experimental study on dynamic performance of typical nonballasted track systems using a full-scale test rig

This paper presents an experimental study on dynamic performance of China Railway Track System (CRTS) series track systems using a full-scale test rig. The test rig has been constructed based on 55.17 m long full-scale nonballasted tracks composed of four typical CRTS track elements in high-speed railways. First, the dynamic characteristics of different nonballasted tracks are investigated by conducting wheel-drop tests, where a wheel-drop testing vehicle with a dropping wheelset is devised to provide the wheel-drop load. The vibration levels of different track systems are assessed by the root-mean-square acceleration per one-third octave band, and the vibration transmission characteristics of the CRTS series tracks are evaluated by transfer functions. Further, a mathematical track model is used to extract the dynamic stiffness and damping coefficient of the four types of nonballasted track systems based on the wheel–rail impact response. The vibration characteristics, the dynamic stiffness, and damping coefficient of different nonballasted track systems under various wheel-drop heights are compared and discussed in detail.

[1]  C. Esveld.  Modern railway track , 1989 .

[2]  Y. Peiyu,et al.  Static and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Cement-Asphalt Composites , 2013 .

[3]  M. Villot,et al.  Analytical and experimental study of sleeper SAT S 312 in slab track Sateba system , 2006 .

[4]  C Esveld,et al.  Assessment of design parameters of a slab track railway system from a dynamic viewpoint , 2007 .

[5]  Lutz Auersch,et al.  Dynamics of the railway track and the underlying soil: the boundary-element solution, theoretical results and their experimental verification , 2005 .

[6]  J Y Zhu.  Analysis of dynamic behaviour of low vibration track under wheel load drop by a finite element method algorithm , 2008 .

[7]  Kaiyun Wang,et al.  Experimental investigation on vibration behaviour of a CRH train at speed of 350 km/h , 2015 .

[8]  Q. Yuan,et al.  Dynamic mechanical properties of cement and asphalt mortar based on SHPB test , 2014 .

[9]  Liu Wei,et al.  Study on dynamic stiffness and damp measurement of railway crushed stone ballast , 2002 .

[10]  P J Remington.  Wheel/rail noise—Part IV: Rolling noise , 1976 .

[11]  Liu Yang.  Test of Dynamic Behavior of the Track Structures with Different Types of Sleepers , 2010 .

[12]  Xiaozhen Li,et al.  High-speed train–track–bridge dynamic interactions – Part I: theoretical model and numerical simulation , 2013 .

[13]  Sheng-yang Zhu,et al.  Interface damage and its effect on vibrations of slab track under temperature and vehicle dynamic loads , 2014 .

[14]  Wanming Zhai,et al.  Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics , 2009 .

[15]  Pol D. Spanos,et al.  A nonlinear and fractional derivative viscoelastic model for rail pads in the dynamic analysis of coupled vehicle-slab track systems , 2015 .

[16]  Hua Yan,et al.  Low-frequency vibration control of floating slab tracks using dynamic vibration absorbers , 2015 .

[17]  Pierre-Etienne Gautier,et al.  Slab track: Review of existing systems and optimization potentials including very high speed , 2015 .

[18]  Pedro Galvín,et al.  Fully three-dimensional analysis of high-speed train–track–soil-structure dynamic interaction , 2010 .

[19]  Wanming Zhai,et al.  High-speed train–track–bridge dynamic interactions – Part II: experimental validation and engineering application , 2013 .