Roost site selection by Little Owls Athene noctua in relation to environmental conditions and life-history stages

Roost site selection is a state-dependent process, affected by the individual's costs and benefits of roosting at a specific site in the available environment. Costs and benefits of different roost sites vary in relation to intrinsic factors and environmental conditions. Thus, the cost–benefit functions of roost sites are expected to differ between seasons and life-history stages, resulting in adjustments in roost site selection. Studying roost site selection throughout the year therefore provides information about year-round habitat requirements at different life-history stages. However, little is known about the roosting behaviour of birds. Here, the roost site selection of Little Owls Athene noctua was studied by repeated daytime location of 24 adult and 75 juvenile radiotagged individuals from July to November. Little Owls preferred sheltered roost sites such as tree cavities with multiple entrances. They increasingly used sheltered sites from summer to winter and preferentially used sheltered roost sites with low ambient temperatures. Juveniles used significantly less sheltered sites during dispersal than before and afterwards, and used less sheltered sites than adults within their home-range. The survival probability of birds roosting frequently at exposed sites was reduced. Roost site selection is probably driven by the two mechanisms of predator avoidance and thermoregulation, and the costs of natal dispersal may include increased predation threat and higher energy expenditure for thermoregulation. We suggest that adequate roost sites, such as multi-entrance tree cavities, are an important habitat requirement for Little Owls and that habitat quality can be affected by manipulating their availability.

[1]  G. Walsberg Thermal Consequences of Roost-site Selection: The Relative Importance of Three Modes of Heat Conservation , 1986 .

[2]  P. Drent The importance of nestboxes for territory settlement, survival and density of the Great Tit , 1987 .

[3]  J. Belthoff,et al.  Roosting behavior of postfledging Eastern Screech-Owls , 1990 .

[4]  G. S. Bakken Estimating the Effect of Wind on Avian Metabolic Rate with Standard Operative Temperature , 1990 .

[5]  G. S. Bakken Wind speed dependence of the overall thermal conductance of fur and feather insulation , 1991 .

[6]  I. Newton The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: A review , 1994 .

[7]  A. Oppliger,et al.  Ectoparasite affects choice and use of roost sites in the great tit, Parus major , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Theunis Piersma,et al.  Effects of Microhabitat, Flocking, Climate and Migratory Goal on Energy Expenditure in the Annual Cycle of Red Knots , 1994 .

[9]  B. O. Wolf,et al.  Thermal Effects of Radiation and Wind on a Small Bird and Implications for Microsite Selection , 1996 .

[10]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations , 1998 .

[11]  C. Krebs,et al.  ROOST SITE SELECTION OF GREAT HORNED OWLS IN RELATION TO BLACK FLY ACTIVITY: AN ANTI-PARASITE BEHAVIOR? , 2000 .

[12]  K. Wiebe MICROCLIMATE OF TREE CAVITY NESTS: IS IT IMPORTANT FOR REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN NORTHERN FLICKERS? , 2001 .

[13]  J. Moncrieff,et al.  How much energy do barn owls (Tyto alba) save by roosting? , 2001, Journal of thermal biology.

[14]  P. Sunde,et al.  Diurnal exposure as a risk sensitive behaviour in tawny owls Strix aluco , 2003 .

[15]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Quantitative measurement of food selection , 1974, Oecologia.

[16]  W. Buttemer Energy relations of winter roost-site utilization by American goldfinches (Carduelis tristis) , 1985, Oecologia.

[17]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  R2WinBUGS: A Package for Running WinBUGS from R , 2005 .

[18]  B Naef-Daenzer,et al.  Miniaturization (0.2 g) and evaluation of attachment techniques of telemetry transmitters , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  D. Otis,et al.  Shorebird roost-site selection at two temporal scales: Is human disturbance a factor? , 2006 .

[20]  Martin Paclík,et al.  Microclimate of tree cavities during winter nights—implications for roost site selection in birds , 2007, International journal of biometeorology.

[21]  M. Kéry,et al.  Selection of Night Roosts in Winter by Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus in Central Europe , 2007 .

[22]  María del Mar Delgado,et al.  Changes of movement patterns from early dispersal to settlement , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  A. Dhondt,et al.  Why do Corsican Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus ogliastrae not use nest boxes for roosting? , 2009, Journal of Ornithology.

[24]  J. Tillmann Fear of the dark: night-time roosting and anti-predation behaviour in the grey partridge (Perdix perdix L.) , 2009 .

[25]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Spatial behaviour of little owls (Athene noctua) in a declining low-density population in Denmark , 2009, Journal of Ornithology.

[26]  C. Garroway,et al.  Thermal Properties of Tree Cavities During Winter in a Northern Hardwood Forest , 2010 .

[27]  M. Mainwaring The use of Nestboxes by Roosting Birds during the Non-Breeding Season: A Review of the Costs and Benefits , 2011 .

[28]  Jan‐Åke Nilsson,et al.  Nocturnal body temperature in wintering blue tits is affected by roost-site temperature and body reserves , 2011, Oecologia.

[29]  Seasonal survival rates and causes of mortality of Little Owls in Denmark , 2012, Journal of Ornithology.

[30]  M. Grüebler,et al.  Temperature characteristics of winter roost-sites for birds and mammals: tree cavities and anthropogenic alternatives , 2014, International Journal of Biometeorology.