Affect, risk, and decision making.

Risk is perceived and acted on in 2 fundamental ways. Risk as feelings refers to individuals' fast, instinctive, and intuitive reactions to danger. Risk as analysis brings logic, reason, and scientific deliberation to bear on risk management. Reliance on risk as feelings is described with "the affect heuristic." The authors trace the development of this heuristic across a variety of research paths. The authors also discuss some of the important practical implications resulting from ways that this heuristic impacts how people perceive and evaluate risk, and, more generally, how it influences all human decision making. Finally, some important implications of the affect heuristic for communication and decision making pertaining to cancer prevention and treatment are briefly discussed.

[1]  Yuval Rottenstreich,et al.  On decision making without likelihood judgment. , 2006 .

[2]  H. Valdimarsdottir,et al.  Decision making and decision support for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[3]  R. Myers,et al.  Decision counseling in cancer prevention and control. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[4]  Daniel G Goldstein,et al.  Making better decisions: from measuring to constructing preferences. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[5]  Roy Cameron,et al.  Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: evidence from Canadian smokers. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[6]  Judith H Hibbard,et al.  Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. , 2003, Annual review of public health.

[7]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Judgment and decision making: The dance of affect and reason. , 2003 .

[8]  R. Thaler,et al.  Libertarian Paternalism is Not an Oxymoron , 2003 .

[9]  Daniel Romer,et al.  Reducing adolescent risk: toward an integrated approach. , 2003 .

[10]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about entering screening programs. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  J. Weinman,et al.  The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour , 2003 .

[12]  P. Slovic.  Affect, Analysis, Adolescence, and Risk , 2003 .

[13]  J. Shanteau,et al.  Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research: List of Contributors , 2003 .

[14]  Howard Leventhal,et al.  The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour. , 2003 .

[15]  C. Schneider,et al.  How underlying patient beliefs can affect physician-patient communication about prostate-specific antigen testing. , 2002, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[16]  C. Travis.  Smoking: Risk, Perception, and Policy , 2002 .

[17]  V F Reyna,et al.  Genetic testing and medical decision making. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[18]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks: On the Affective Psychology of Risk , 2001, Psychological science.

[19]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  S. Reventlow,et al.  "In really great danger..." The concept of risk in general practice. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[21]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Springs of Action: Affective and Analytical Information Processing in Choice , 2000 .

[22]  P. Slovic,et al.  Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Communication: The Effects of Using Actual Cases, Providing Instruction, and Employing Probability Versus Frequency Formats , 2000, Law and human behavior.

[23]  Laura L. Carstensen,et al.  The Bearable Lightness of Aging : Judgment and Decision Processes in Older Adults , 2003 .

[24]  L. Carstensen,et al.  The aging mind : opportunities in cognitive research , 2000 .

[25]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[26]  B. Shiv,et al.  Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making , 1999 .

[27]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[28]  R. Croyle,et al.  Risk communication in genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[29]  Karen Gasper,et al.  The persistent use of negative affect by anxious individuals to estimate risk. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Piotr Winkielman,et al.  Subliminal affective priming resists attributional interventions. , 1997 .

[31]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives , 1996 .

[32]  A. Miles,et al.  Effective clinical practice , 1996 .

[33]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[34]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[35]  P. Slovic,et al.  A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[36]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[37]  P. Slovic,et al.  Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical Risks , 1992, Toxicologic pathology.

[38]  S. Epstein,et al.  Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  N. Sanders,et al.  Journal of behavioral decision making: "The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting", 5 (1992) 39-52 , 1992 .

[40]  W. Kip Viscusi,et al.  Smoking: Making the Risky Decision , 1992 .

[41]  R. Bornstein.  Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[42]  L. Hendrickx,et al.  Relative importance of scenario information and frequency information in the judgment of risk , 1989 .

[43]  J. Knetsch.  The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves. , 1989 .

[44]  Vincent T. Covello,et al.  Effective risk communication : the role and responsibility of government and nongovernment organizations , 1989 .

[45]  Peter M. Sandman,et al.  Hazard versus Outrage in the Public Perception of Risk , 1989 .

[46]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[47]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[48]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[49]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[50]  Harold D. Lasswell,et al.  The Policy Sciences , 1953 .