ENABLE (Exportable Notation and Bookmark List Engine): an Interface to Manage Tumor Measurement Data from PACS to Cancer Databases

Oncologists evaluate therapeutic response in cancer trials based on tumor quantification following selected “target” lesions over time. At our cancer center, a majority of oncologists use Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 quantifying tumor progression based on lesion measurements on imaging. Currently, our oncologists handwrite tumor measurements, followed by multiple manual data transfers; however, our Picture Archiving Communication System (PACS) (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY) has the ability to export tumor measurements, making it possible to manage tumor metadata digitally. We developed an interface, “Exportable Notation and Bookmark List Engine” (ENABLE), which produces prepopulated RECIST v1.1 worksheets and compiles cohort data and data models from PACS measurement data, thus eliminating handwriting and manual data transcription. We compared RECIST v1.1 data from eight patients (16 computed tomography exams) enrolled in an IRB-approved therapeutic trial with ENABLE outputs: 10 data fields with a total of 194 data points. All data in ENABLE’s output matched with the existing data. Seven staff were taught how to use the interface with a 5-min explanatory instructional video. All were able to use ENABLE successfully without additional guidance. We additionally assessed 42 metastatic genitourinary cancer patients with available RECIST data within PACS to produce a best response waterfall plot. ENABLE manages tumor measurements and associated metadata exported from PACS, producing forms and data models compatible with cancer databases, obviating handwriting and the manual re-entry of data. Automation should reduce transcription errors and improve efficiency and the auditing process.

[1]  Tiffany Shao,et al.  Use and misuse of waterfall plots. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  M Sevenster,et al.  Natural Language Processing Techniques for Extracting and Categorizing Finding Measurements in Narrative Radiology Reports , 2015, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[3]  Les R Folio,et al.  Automated registration, segmentation, and measurement of metastatic melanoma tumors in serial CT scans. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[4]  T. Gillespie,et al.  Understanding Waterfall Plots , 2012, Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology.

[5]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[6]  Menashe Benjamin,et al.  Quantitative Radiology Reporting in Oncology: Survey of Oncologists and Radiologists. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Evrim B Turkbey,et al.  Viable tumor volume: Volume of interest within segmented metastatic lesions, a pilot study of proposed computed tomography response criteria for urothelial cancer. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[8]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Tool Support to Enable Evaluation of the Clinical Response to Treatment , 2008, AMIA.

[9]  D J Hawkes,et al.  Algorithms for radiological image registration and their clinical application , 1998, Journal of anatomy.

[10]  Tracy A Jaffe,et al.  Quantitative imaging in oncology patients: Part 1, radiology practice patterns at major U.S. cancer centers. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Merlijn Sevenster,et al.  Improved efficiency in clinical workflow of reporting measured oncology lesions via PACS-integrated lesion tracking tool. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Tracy A Jaffe,et al.  Quantitative imaging in oncology patients: Part 2, oncologists' opinions and expectations at major U.S. cancer centers. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Laura B. Machado,et al.  Radiology Reports With Hyperlinks Improve Target Lesion Selection and Measurement Concordance in Cancer Trials. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  A cross-platform and distributive database system for cumulative tumor measurement , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  Cristine Kao,et al.  Traditional text-only versus multimedia-enhanced radiology reporting: referring physicians' perceptions of value. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[16]  Stefan L. Zimmerman,et al.  Informatics in radiology: automated structured reporting of imaging findings using the AIM standard and XML. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[17]  Vahid Yaghmai,et al.  Radiologic assessment of response to therapy: comparison of RECIST Versions 1.1 and 1.0. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.