An efficient DNA- and selectable-marker-free genome-editing system using zygotes in rice

Technology involving the targeted mutagenesis of plants using programmable nucleases has been developing rapidly and has enormous potential in next-generation plant breeding. Notably, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–CRISPR-associated protein-9 nuclease (Cas9) (CRISPR–Cas9) system has paved the way for the development of rapid and cost-effective procedures to create new mutant populations in plants1,2. Although genome-edited plants from multiple species have been produced successfully using a method in which a Cas9–guide RNA (gRNA) expression cassette and selectable marker are integrated into the genomic DNA by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation or particle bombardment3, CRISPR–Cas9 integration increases the chance of off-target modifications4, and foreign DNA sequences cause legislative concerns about genetically modified organisms5. Therefore, DNA-free genome editing has been developed, involving the delivery of preassembled Cas9–gRNA ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) into protoplasts derived from somatic tissues by polyethylene glycol–calcium (PEG–Ca2+)-mediated transfection in tobacco, Arabidopsis, lettuce, rice6, Petunia7, grapevine, apple8 and potato9, or into embryo cells by biolistic bombardment in maize10 and wheat11. However, the isolation and culture of protoplasts is not feasible in most plant species and the frequency of obtaining genome-edited plants through biolistic bombardment is relatively low. Here, we report a genome-editing system via direct delivery of Cas9–gRNA RNPs into plant zygotes. Cas9–gRNA RNPs were transfected into rice zygotes produced by in vitro fertilization of isolated gametes12 and the zygotes were cultured into mature plants in the absence of selection agents, resulting in the regeneration of rice plants with targeted mutations in around 14–64% of plants. This efficient plant-genome-editing system has enormous potential for the improvement of rice as well as other important crop species.Efficient genome editing using DNA-free systems remains challenging in most plant species. Now, a new genome-editing system achieves efficient DNA- and selectable-marker-free gene editing by direct delivery of Cas9–guide RNA ribonucleoproteins into rice zygotes.

[1]  V. Raghavan.  Some reflections on double fertilization, from its discovery to the present. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[2]  T. Okamoto,et al.  Electro-fusion of Gametes and Subsequent Culture of Zygotes in Rice , 2016 .

[3]  P. Hofvander,et al.  Genome editing in potato via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivery. , 2018, Physiologia plantarum.

[4]  Jeffry D. Sander,et al.  Efficient In Vivo Genome Editing Using RNA-Guided Nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Vladimir Nekrasov,et al.  Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system , 2013, Plant Methods.

[6]  J. Kumlehn,et al.  Differentiation of isolated wheat zygotes into embryos and normal plants , 1998, Planta.

[7]  T. Okamoto,et al.  Establishment of an in vitro fertilization system in rice (Oryza sativa L.) , 2007, Planta.

[8]  B. Barnabás,et al.  Electro-fused isolated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) gametes develop into multicellular structures , 1995, Plant Cell Reports.

[9]  Masafumi Mikami,et al.  Comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 expression constructs for efficient targeted mutagenesis in rice , 2015, Plant Molecular Biology.

[10]  N. Patron,et al.  Induction of targeted, heritable mutations in barley and Brassica oleracea using RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease , 2015, Genome Biology.

[11]  Joshua K Young,et al.  Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR–Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes , 2016, Nature Communications.

[12]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis in Petunia × hybrida protoplast system using direct delivery of purified recombinant Cas9 ribonucleoproteins , 2016, Plant Cell Reports.

[13]  S. Oka,et al.  Early infection of scutellum tissue with Agrobacterium allows high-speed transformation of rice. , 2006, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[14]  T. Okamoto,et al.  Development of gene expression system in egg cells and zygotes isolated from rice and maize , 2017, Plant direct.

[15]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Mutations in Multiple Genes by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering , 2013, Cell.

[16]  D. Voytas.  Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases. , 2013, Annual review of plant biology.

[17]  T. Okamoto,et al.  Development of Polyspermic Rice Zygotes1[OPEN] , 2016, Plant Physiology.

[18]  R. Viola,et al.  DNA-Free Genetically Edited Grapevine and Apple Protoplast Using CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[19]  P. Lurquin.  Entrapment of plasmid DNA by liposomes and their interactions with plant protoplasts. , 1979, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Vinay Kumar,et al.  The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing: advances and opportunities. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[21]  T. Koshiba,et al.  Isolation of gametes and central cells from Oryza sativa L. , 2006, Sexual Plant Reproduction.

[22]  S. Knudsen,et al.  Regeneration of Fertile Barley Plants from Mechanically Isolated Protoplasts of the Fertilized Egg Cell. , 1994, The Plant cell.

[23]  M. Davey,et al.  Transformation of Petunia protoplasts by isolated Agrobacterium plasmids , 1980 .

[24]  I. Potrykus,et al.  High Efficiency Direct Gene Transfer to Plants , 1985, Bio/Technology.

[25]  K. Shinozaki,et al.  Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to modify abiotic stress responses in plants , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[26]  E. Kranz,et al.  Early cytological events after induction of cell division in egg cells and zygote development following in vitro fertilization with angiosperm gametes , 1995 .

[27]  Soon Il Kwon,et al.  DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  Kristopher T. Jensen,et al.  Chromatin accessibility and guide sequence secondary structure affect CRISPR‐Cas9 gene editing efficiency , 2017, FEBS letters.

[29]  E. Kranz,et al.  In Vitro Fertilization with Isolated, Single Gametes Results in Zygotic Embryogenesis and Fertile Maize Plants. , 1993, The Plant cell.

[30]  Yanpeng Wang,et al.  Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes , 2017, Nature Communications.

[31]  Michael Zuker,et al.  Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[32]  Huw D Jones,et al.  Regulatory uncertainty over genome editing , 2015, Nature Plants.

[33]  C. Dumas,et al.  Isolated maize zygotes mimic in vivo embryonic development and express microinjected genes when cultured in vitro. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[34]  J. Oakes,et al.  Micromanipulation techniques in plant biotechnology , 1986 .