Human transformities in a global hierarchy: Emergy and scale in the production of people and culture

In emergy research, transformities are of fundamental importance. They are factors that are used to convert the inputs to a process into emergy. Once placed in emergy units, the inputs to any process can then be added together or compared. Furthermore, as a product of an emergy analysis, new transformities for outputs can be used in other analyses. By this process the collection of known transformities grows, and subsequent emergy analyses become more accurate. Human labor is often a critical input to an emergy analysis. Transformities for humans have only been roughly estimated based on education level, and should be judged as first approximations. This paper refines the existing values for human services, using similar techniques, but with some different assumptions. The result is a larger range of human transformities, expanded at both lower and upper ends that range from 7.53E4 to 7.53E13. There are many applications of this knowledge, from improving empirical studies to expositions of hierarchy that more reliably “locate” humans, economic production, and information within energy transformation hierarchies.

[1]  C. Mills,et al.  Power Elite , 1956, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[2]  H. Odum,et al.  Self-Organization, Transformity, and Information , 1988, Science.

[3]  Grahame F. Thompson,et al.  Globalization in Question , 1996 .

[4]  Marta Rohatynskyj,et al.  Reorient: Global Economy in the Asian Age , 2000 .

[5]  N. Polunin.  Ecosystem Theory and Application , 1986 .

[6]  D. Commerce.  Statistical abstract of the United States , 1978 .

[7]  Fran Tonkiss.  Contemporary Economic Sociology: Globalization, Production, Inequality , 2006 .

[8]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[9]  F. Meillaud,et al.  Evaluation of a building using the emergy method , 2005 .

[10]  Mary Shaw,et al.  The Handbook of Inequality and Socioeconomic Position: Concepts and Measures , 2007 .

[11]  David J. Rothkopf.  Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making , 2008 .

[12]  Takis Fotopoulos.  Globalisation, the reformist Left and the Anti-Globalisation 'Movement' , 2001 .

[13]  P. Dicken.  Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century , 2003 .

[14]  N. Kabeer.  Gender Mainstreaming in Poverty Eradication and the Millennium Development Goals: A Handbook for Policy-Makers and Other Stakeholders , 2003 .

[15]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making , 1995 .

[16]  Grahame F. Thompson,et al.  Globalization in Question. The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance , 1996 .

[17]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environment, Power, and Society , 1972 .

[18]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[19]  J. Urry.  The concept of society and the future of sociology , 2007 .

[20]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environment, Power, and Society for the Twenty-First Century: The Hierarchy of Energy , 2007 .