Deliberating across differences: Planning futures in cross-cultural spaces

Abstract Power imbalances and cultural differences between community members can raise challenges for deliberative democrats who want to design equal and open dialogic processes. This article examines how one organization accounted for power and responded to cultural difference in its design of a deliberative planning process. My research indicates that a deliberative planning process can address power imbalances and cultural differences through several techniques. The hand-selection and strategic recruitment of participants ensures broad community representation within the process. The incorporation of storytelling, an emphasis on emphatic listening and the creation of a safe deliberative space, helps mitigate inequality and foster reciprocity. Power imbalances between participants can also be downplayed by focusing deliberations on broader planning and policy frameworks, as opposed to highly specified policy decisions. These techniques may best be implemented by focusing on dialogue instead of deliberation. Finally, this article reveals the importance of considering cultural difference, beyond its relation to power imbalance, to develop cross-cultural deliberative processes.

[1]  Herbert Snyder,et al.  Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data , 1996 .

[2]  Theory, Evidence, and the Tasks of Deliberation , 2007 .

[3]  Robyne S. Turner,et al.  Managing Growth in a Climate of Urban Diversity , 2001 .

[4]  S. Harwood.  Struggling to embrace difference in land-use decision making in multicultural communities , 2005 .

[5]  P. Healey.  Collaborative Planning in Perspective , 2003 .

[6]  Stephen Macedo,et al.  Deliberative politics : essays on democracy and disagreement , 1999 .

[7]  Liam Fahey,et al.  Learning from the Future: Competitive Foresight Scenarios: Editors Liam Fahey and Robert M. Randall, John Wiley (1998), 446 pp., £27.50 , 1998 .

[8]  Diego Gambetta.  Deliberative Democracy: “Claro!”: An Essay on Discursive Machismo , 1998 .

[9]  John Forester,et al.  Learning from Practice Stories: The Priority of Practical Judgment , 1993 .

[10]  Alain Boyer.  Democracy and Disagreement , 1995 .

[11]  S. Rosenberg.  Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern? , 2007 .

[12]  J. Llewelyn.  Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis , 1985 .

[13]  William E. Connolly,et al.  Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox , 1991 .

[14]  N. Burbules,et al.  Dialogue across Differences: Continuing the Conversation , 1991 .

[15]  I. Young,et al.  Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy , 2001 .

[16]  Lutz E. Schlange.  Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[17]  B. Honig.  Political Theory And The Displacement Of Politics , 1993 .

[18]  D. Kolb,et al.  Planning in the Face of Power. , 1988 .

[19]  S. Lukes.  Power: A Radical View , 1974 .

[20]  M. Qadeer.  Pluralistic Planning for Multicultural Cities: The Canadian Practice , 1997 .

[21]  B. Flyvbjerg.  RATIONALITY AND POWER: DEMOCRACY IN PRACTICE , 1999 .

[22]  P. Healey.  Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[23]  Ethan J. Leib,et al.  The search for deliberative democracy in China , 2006 .

[24]  Archon Fung,et al.  Minipublics: Deliberative Designs and Their Consequences , 2007 .

[25]  Frank Fischer,et al.  The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning , 1993 .

[26]  Robert Fildes.  Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[27]  Simon Niemeyer,et al.  Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals , 2006 .

[28]  James A. Ogilvy,et al.  Creating Better Futures: Scenario Planning as a Tool for a Better Tomorrow , 2002 .

[29]  G. J. Sánchez.  Becoming Mexican American: Ethnicity, Culture, and Identity in Chicano Los Angeles, 1900-1945 , 1993 .

[30]  J. Ogilvy,et al.  Mapping Public and Private Scenario Planning: Lessons from regional projects , 2004 .

[31]  Leonie Sandercock,et al.  When Strangers Become Neighbours: Managing Cities of Difference , 2000 .

[32]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Network Power in Collaborative Planning , 2000 .

[33]  Yasminah Beebeejaun,et al.  The participation trap: The limitations of participation for ethnic and racial groups , 2006 .

[34]  C. Hendriks,et al.  Integrated Deliberation: Reconciling Civil Society's Dual Role in Deliberative Democracy , 2006 .

[35]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy , 1995 .

[36]  John Gastil,et al.  The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies For Effective Civic Engagement In The Twenty-First Century , 2005 .

[37]  G. Lipsitz.  The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit from Identity Politics , 1999 .

[38]  J. Dryzek.  Deliberative Democracy And Beyond , 2000 .

[39]  L. D. Hopkins,et al.  Urban Development: The Logic Of Making Plans , 2001 .

[40]  R. Dostal.  The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer , 2002 .

[41]  K. Walsh.  The Democratic Potential of Civic Dialogue , 2007 .

[42]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  The Use of Scenarios in Land-Use Planning , 2003 .

[43]  O. Yiftachel,et al.  New Paradigm or Old Myopia? Unsettling the Communicative Turn in Planning Theory , 2000 .

[44]  Thorsten Hüller.  John Gastil, Peter Levine (eds.): The deliberative democracy handbook. Strategies for effective civic engagement in the 21st century , 2007 .

[45]  W. Magnusson.  Bourgeois Theories of Local Government , 1986 .

[46]  S. Clegg.  Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2002 .

[47]  Christopher F. Karpowitz,et al.  How People Deliberate about Justice: Groups, Gender, and Decision Rules , 2007 .

[48]  Ted Knowlton Aicp.  Engaging the Future: Forecasts, Scenarios, Plans, and Projects , 2009 .

[49]  C. Mouffe.  Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism , 2000 .

[50]  Patsy Healey,et al.  The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. , 2001 .

[51]  C. Mouffe.  The Democratic Paradox , 2000 .

[52]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2001 .

[53]  Archon Fung.  Deliberation before the Revolution , 2005 .

[54]  I. Young.  Justice and the Politics of Difference , 1990, The New Social Theory Reader.

[55]  Seyla Benhabib,et al.  Democracy and difference : contesting the boundaries of the political , 1996 .

[56]  L. Sandercock,et al.  Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities , 1997 .