Anybody (at) home? Communicative efficiency knocking on the Construction Grammar door

Abstract The present study focuses on the locative adverbials home and at home, which are interchangeable in some contexts, e.g. She decided to stay (at) home today. Using data from the spoken component of COCA and different multivariate statistical techniques, such as conditional inference trees and dichotomous logistic regression, I investigate the differences between home and at home with regard to several contextual variables, such as the syntactic function of (at) home, the presence of particular adverbs, e.g. back (at) home, figurativeness of semantics and the presence of presupposed arrival in the context. Moreover, special attention is paid to the variables that represent predictability of Verb + (at) home given a verbal predicate and the other way round, as well as linguistic distance between the predicate and the locative adjunct. The effects of these variables are interpreted as a manifestation of the universal tendency to maximize communicative efficiency and minimize cognitive complexity. I also argue that these effects represent an important social aspect of language use that should be taken into account by contemporary Cognitive Linguistics and Construction Grammar.

[1]  Natalia Levshina,et al.  “Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward” , 2016 .

[2]  D. Geeraerts.  The sociosemiotic commitment , 2016 .

[3]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[4]  Benedikt Szmrecsanyi,et al.  Around the world in three alternations: Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English , 2016 .

[5]  Britta Mondorf.  More Support for More -Support , 2009 .

[6]  Alice Turk,et al.  The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech , 2004, Language and speech.

[7]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Signal Reduction and Linguistic Encoding , 2017 .

[8]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[9]  Roger Levy,et al.  Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction , 2006, NIPS.

[10]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice , 2012, Language Variation and Change.

[11]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies , 1966 .

[12]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Toward a social cognitive linguistics , 2009 .

[13]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production , 2008 .

[14]  Jason M. Brenier,et al.  Predictability Effects on Durations of Content and Function Words in Conversational English , 2009 .

[15]  K. Hornik,et al.  Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework , 2006 .

[16]  Chris Brew.  The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2003 .

[17]  H. Schmid.  A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and- Conventionalization Model , 2015 .

[18]  Chigusa Kurumada,et al.  Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in Japanese , 2015 .

[19]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Lexical Variation in Relativizer Frequency , 2009 .

[20]  M. Haspelmath,et al.  Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries , 2008 .

[21]  Mark Davies.  The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) , 2012 .

[22]  S. Wood.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R , 2006 .

[23]  Holger Diessel,et al.  Frequency Effects in Grammar , 2016 .

[24]  Rudi Keller,et al.  On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language , 1994 .

[25]  Jenny Mandelbaum,et al.  Looking Ahead , 2000 .

[26]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Language, Usage and Cognition , 2010 .

[27]  G. Rohdenburg.  Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English , 1996 .

[28]  G. Dell,et al.  Effect of Ambiguity and Lexical Availability on Syntactic and Lexical Production , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Natalia Levshina,et al.  Probabilistic grammar and constructional predictability: Bayesian generalized additive models of help + (to) Infinitive in varieties of web-based English , 2018 .

[30]  S. Gries,et al.  Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions , 2005 .