Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Three outpatient therapies--cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)--are used in the US for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). There has been considerable controversy, however, about the relative safety, efficacy, and costs of these methods. A rigorous study (Mitchell et al.) in which patients were stratified by key prognostic variables provided irrefutable evidence of the similarity of efficacy of the three methods. This suggests that only cost and concern over the small risk of missing adenocarcinoma-in-situ or microinvasive cancer need influence decisions about CIN treatment. Women with lesions affecting more than two-thirds of the surface of the cervix are more than 19 times more likely to have persistent disease than women with smaller lesions, regardless of therapy type. The amount of tissue removed by laser, cryotherapy, and LEEP is small, so these techniques have no adverse affect on pregnancy. The issue of whether low-grade lesions should be treated, even though most are self-limiting, continues to be debated.

[1]  J. Phipps,et al.  Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) compared to carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of CIN: a superior mode of treatment , 1990, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  V. Wright,et al.  THE CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA: THE USE OF CRYOSURGERY AND THE CARBON DIOXIDE LASER , 1981, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  A. Ferenczy Comparison of cryo‐ and carbon dioxide laser therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  T. Wright,et al.  Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Using the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  N. Naftalin,et al.  A study of cryosurgery and the CO2 laser in treatment of carcinoma in situ (CIN III) of the uterine cervix. , 1985, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  F. Montz Impact of therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on fertility. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  A. Ferenczy,et al.  Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix: Advantages and Potential Pitfalls , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  P. Bezemer,et al.  Laser or cryotherapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized study to compare efficacy and side effects. , 1985, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  Richart Rm,et al.  Cryotherapy and carbon dioxide laser management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a controlled comparison. , 1983 .

[10]  M. Nasiell,et al.  Behavior of mild cervical dysplasia during long-term follow-up. , 1986 .

[11]  D. Edmonds,et al.  Does treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia affect fertility and pregnancy? , 1990, BMJ.

[12]  G. Nuovo,et al.  Human papillomavirus types and recurrent cervical warts in immunocompromised women. , 1991, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[13]  E. Partridge,et al.  Prospective Randomized Trial of LLETZ versus Laser Ablation in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia , 1994 .

[14]  M. Mitchell,et al.  A Randomized Clinical Trial of Cryotherapy, Laser Vaporization, and Loop Electrosurgical Excision for Treatment of Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix , 1998, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  J. Bock,et al.  Laser and cryo surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A randomized trial with longterm follow‐up , 1991, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[16]  A. Fletcher,et al.  Invasive cervical cancer after conservative therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , 1997, The Lancet.

[17]  E. Bostofte,et al.  Outpatient Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: The CO2 laser versus cryotherapy, a randomized trial , 1987, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.