Dynamic hierarchical mobility management strategy for mobile IP networks

One of the major challenges for the wireless network design is the efficient mobility management, which can be addressed globally (macromobility) and locally (micromobility). Mobile Internet protocol (IP) is a commonly accepted standard to address global mobility of mobile hosts (MHs). It requires the MHs to register with the home agents (HAs) whenever their care-of addresses change. However, such registrations may cause excessive signaling traffic and long service delay. To solve this problem, the hierarchical mobile IP (HMIP) protocol was proposed to employ the hierarchy of foreign agents (FAs) and the gateway FAs (GFAs) to localize registration operations. However, the system performance is critically affected by the selection of GFAs and their reliability. In this paper, we introduce a novel dynamic hierarchical mobility management strategy for mobile IP networks, in which different hierarchies are dynamically set up for different users and the signaling burden is evenly distributed among the network. To justify the effectiveness of our proposed scheme, we develop an analytical model to evaluate the signaling cost. Our performance analysis shows that the proposed dynamic hierarchical mobility management strategy can significantly reduce the system signaling cost under various scenarios and the system robustness is greatly enhanced. Our analysis also shows that the new scheme can outperform the Internet Engineering Task Force mobile IP hierarchical registration scheme in terms of the overall signaling cost. The more important contribution is the novel analytical approach in evaluating the performance of mobile IP networks.

[1]  Israel Cidon,et al.  An Anchor Chain Scheme for IP Mobility Management , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[2]  Ramón Cáceres,et al.  Fast and scalable handoffs for wireless internetworks , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[3]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Optimized smooth handoffs in Mobile IP , 1999, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Computers and Communications (Cat. No.PR00250).

[4]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Mobile user location update and paging under delay constraints , 1995, Wirel. Networks.

[5]  Thomas F. La Porta,et al.  HAWAII: a domain-based approach for supporting mobility in wide-area wireless networks , 2002, Proceedings. Seventh International Conference on Network Protocols.

[6]  F. M. Chiussi,et al.  Mobility management in third-generation all-IP networks , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[7]  Chieh-Yih Wan,et al.  Comparison of IP micromobility protocols , 2002, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[8]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  Location management employing two-level forwarding pointers in PCS networks , 2002, Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM '02. IEEE.

[9]  Andrew T. Campbell,et al.  An overview of cellular IP , 1999, WCNC. 1999 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (Cat. No.99TH8466).

[10]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support for IPv4 , 2002, RFC.

[11]  David J. Goodman,et al.  Dynamic location area management and performance analysis , 1993, IEEE 43rd Vehicular Technology Conference.

[12]  Cheng-Ming Weng,et al.  Pointer forwarding MIPv6 mobility management , 2002, Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM '02. IEEE.

[13]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Mobility Management in Next Generation Wireless Systems , 1999, ICCCN.

[14]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  A distributed dynamic regional location management scheme for Mobile IP , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[15]  Yuguang Fang,et al.  Portable movement modeling for PCS networks , 2000, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[16]  Archan Misra,et al.  TeleMIP: telecommunications-enhanced mobile IP architecture for fast intradomain mobility , 2000, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[17]  C. E. Perkins Mobile IP , 1997 .