Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and Bone Scintigraphy in Detection of Bone Metastases of Thyroid Cancer

We compared the efficacies of 18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methods: We examined 47 patients (32 women, 15 men; mean age ± SD, 57.0 ± 10.7 y) with DTC who had undergone total thyroidectomy and were hospitalized to be given 131I therapy. All patients underwent both whole-body 18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-bone scintigraphy. The skeletal system was classified into 11 anatomic segments and assessed for the presence of bone metastases. Bone metastases were verified either when positive findings were obtained on >2 imaging modalities—201Tl scintigraphy, 131I scintigraphy, and CT—or when MRI findings were positive if vertebral MRI was performed. Results: Bone metastases were confirmed in 59 of 517 (11%) segments in 18 (38%) of the 47 study patients. The sensitivities (visualization rate) for bone metastases on a segment basis using 18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-bone scintigraphy were 50 of 59 (84.7%) and 46 of 59 (78.0%), respectively; the difference between these values was not statistically significant. There were only 2 (0.4%) false-positive cases in a total of 451 bone segments without bone metastases when examined by 18F-FDG PET, whereas 39 (8.6%) were false-positive when examined by 99mTc-bone scintigraphy. Therefore, the specificities of 18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-bone scintigraphy were 449 of 451 (99.6%) and 412 of 451 (91.4%), respectively; the difference between these values was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The overall accuracies of 18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-bone scintigraphy were 499 of 510 (97.8%) and 458 of 510 (89.8%), respectively; the difference between these was also statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The specificity and the overall accuracy of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with DTC are higher than those of 99mTc-bone scintigraphy, whereas the difference in the sensitivities of both modalities is not statistically significant. In comparison with 99mTc-bone scintigraphy, 18F-FDG PET is superior because of its lower incidence of false-positive results in the detection of bone metastases of DTC.

[1]  C. Kao,et al.  Comparison and discrepancy of 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and Tc-99m MDP bone scan to detect bone metastases. , 2000, Anticancer research.

[2]  D. Podoloff,et al.  Comparison of bone and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of bony metastases in lung cancer. , 2003, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[3]  J. Shah,et al.  Prognostic indicators of outcomes in patients with distant metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[4]  R. Buchert,et al.  Impact of FDG PET on patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who present with elevated thyroglobulin and negative 131I scan. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  J. Takita,et al.  Comparison between whole-body positron emission tomography and bone scintigraphy in evaluating bony metastases of esophageal carcinomas. , 2005, Anticancer research.

[6]  M E Phelps,et al.  Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography and Fluorodeoxyglucose , 2006 .

[7]  S. Kosuda,et al.  Does bone SPECT actually have lower sensitivity for detecting vertebral metastasis than MRI? , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  J. Mckillop Bone Scanning in Metastatic Disease , 1987 .

[9]  J. Llamas-Elvira,et al.  Utility of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in differentiated thyroid carcinoma with negative radioiodine scans and elevated serum thyroglobulin levels. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[10]  T. Shiga,et al.  Comparison of (18)F-FDG, (131)I-Na, and (201)Tl in diagnosis of recurrent or metastatic thyroid carcinoma. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  S. Yang,et al.  Comparing whole body 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with breast cancer , 2002, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[12]  G. Coates,et al.  FDG PET of recurrent or metastatic 131I-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  Ora Israel,et al.  Positron emission tomography and bone metastases. , 2005, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[14]  T. Saga,et al.  Comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET, 99mTc-MIBI SPET, and post-therapeutic 131I-Na scintigraphy in the detection of metastatic thyroid cancer , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  C. Kao,et al.  Comparing whole body 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methylene diphosphate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with renal cell carcinomas – a preliminary report , 2002, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Kei Yamada,et al.  Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  J L Bloem,et al.  Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy. , 1991, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  P. Rigo,et al.  Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the detection of bone metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  R. Wahl,et al.  Prevalence and Patterns of Bone Metastases Detected with Positron Emission Tomography Using F-18 FDG , 2003, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[20]  A. Alavi,et al.  Comparison of radionuclide bone scans and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting spinal metastases. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  M. Schlumberger [Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma]. , 2000, Annales d'endocrinologie.

[22]  P. Marsden,et al.  Whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in preoperative evaluation of lung cancer , 1994, The Lancet.

[23]  Hans-Jürgen Gallowitsch,et al.  F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography in the Diagnosis of Tumor Recurrence and Metastases in the Follow-Up of Patients With Breast Carcinoma: A Comparison to Conventional Imaging , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[24]  T. Yen,et al.  [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is more sensitive than skeletal scintigraphy for detecting bone metastasis in endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma at initial staging. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  S. Yasuda,et al.  Whole body PET for the evaluation of bony metastases in patients with breast cancer: comparison with 99Tcm-MDP bone scintigraphy , 2001, Nuclear medicine communications.

[26]  P. Merlet,et al.  Clinical impact of (18)F-FDG PET in thyroid carcinoma patients with elevated thyroglobulin levels and negative (131)I scanning results after therapy. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  M. Phelps,et al.  Accuracy of whole-body fluorine-18-FDG PET for the detection of recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.