Using the principles of practice development to address challenges in recruitment and data collection when face-to-face methods are unavailable.

BACKGROUND Researchers conducting studies involving pregnant women often find recruitment challenging. The COVID-19 pandemic added further complexity to studies requiring face-to-face participation. AIM To demonstrate how to maintain the principles of practice development (PD) when a study must switch from face-to-face to remote methods of collecting data. DISCUSSION The number of participants in the authors' study increased when they moved from face-to-face to telephone engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. They continued using PD principles when they changed method and the quality of the data they collected remained constant, even once lockdown restrictions were in place. CONCLUSION PD principles can offer ways for nurse researchers to engage, collaborate with and reflect with people for research projects, including when constraints compete with participation. They can also assist researchers in optimising and maintaining recruitment and data collection when face-to-face research methods are impossible. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The telephone can be a valuable alternative medium for recruiting participants and collecting data when face-to-face methods are impossible to use. PD principles can be maintained and response rates and participation may even be greater when using it.

[1]  Kristie B. Hadden,et al.  Revising Recruitment for Focus Groups to Meet Shifting Needs During COVID-19 , 2021, Nursing research.

[2]  C. Homer,et al.  Australian women's experiences of receiving maternity care during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A cross‐sectional national survey , 2021, Birth.

[3]  L. Gibson,et al.  Wellbeing of Breastfeeding Women in Australia and New Zealand during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2021, Nutrients.

[4]  L. Bakhireva,et al.  Recruitment and retention of pregnant women in prospective birth cohort studies: A scoping review and content analysis of the literature. , 2021, Neurotoxicology and teratology.

[5]  J. Traxler,et al.  Data for Development: Shifting Research Methodologies for Covid-19 , 2020, Journal of Learning for Development.

[6]  J. Myburgh,et al.  An evaluation of the quality and impact of the global research response to the COVID‐19 pandemic , 2020, The Medical journal of Australia.

[7]  Virginia Braun,et al.  One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? , 2020, Qualitative Research in Psychology.

[8]  T. Hompes,et al.  Mental health status of pregnant and breastfeeding women during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A call for action , 2020, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[9]  K. Klump,et al.  Conducting eating disorders research in the time of COVID‐19: A survey of researchers in the field , 2020, The International journal of eating disorders.

[10]  Jacqui Thornton,et al.  Clinical trials suspended in UK to prioritise covid-19 studies and free up staff , 2020, BMJ.

[11]  Nancy J Wise,et al.  Effectiveness of recruitment and retention strategies in a pregnant adolescent nutrition intervention study , 2018, Journal of advanced nursing.

[12]  L. Wen,et al.  Facilitators and challenges in recruiting pregnant women to an infant obesity prevention programme delivered via telephone calls or text messages , 2018, Trials.

[13]  C. Cooper,et al.  Improving recruitment to clinical trials during pregnancy: A mixed methods investigation. , 2018, Social science & medicine.

[14]  Shaun Cardiff,et al.  Reflections on being and becoming a person-centred facilitator , 2015 .

[15]  R. Thakar,et al.  Recruitment of pregnant women in research , 2013, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[16]  E. Epel,et al.  Recruitment and Retention of Pregnant Women for a Behavioral Intervention: Lessons from the Maternal Adiposity, Metabolism, and Stress (MAMAS) Study , 2013, Preventing chronic disease.

[17]  E. Reifsnider,et al.  Predicting Breast‐feeding Attrition: Adapting the Breast‐feeding Attrition Prediction Tool , 2007, The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing.

[18]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[19]  R. Rubin Maternal tasks in pregnancy. , 1976, Journal of advanced nursing.

[20]  Sally Smith,et al.  A shared purpose framework to deliver person-centred, safe and effective care: organisational transformation using practice development methodology , 2014 .

[21]  J. Crisp,et al.  Advancing the practice development outcomes agenda within multiple contexts , 2011 .