Virtual reality laboratories: a review of experiences

Laboratory experiences are critical to the learning process across all domains of engineering, due to the fact that information technology has changed the educational laboratory landscape. Three general laboratory types are found in engineering education; namely, hands-on, virtual and remote; each of them with its own advantages and drawbacks. In this paper, various types of university laboratories around the world are described to present the updated state-of-the-art. Additionally, a discussion regarding the educational effectiveness of each laboratory format is discussed. Finally, a case study of the development and implementation of virtual reality laboratories and remote labs at Tecnologico de Monterrey is presented. Early results have demonstrated that the virtual labs are a viable option to complement and/or replace hands-on labs, mainly because of their low investment, low maintenance costs and ease of replication to meet user demand and, above all, because of their great impact on the new teaching paradigms, where it is necessary to encourage active learning and the development of skills based on challenges. In addition to reviewing the most characteristic learning outcomes of each type of laboratory, different elements that influence the success of teaching and learning processes, such as presence, belief, and collaboration, etc., are reviewed. We hope that this research will serve as a guide for designs of individual, blended or hybrid types of laboratories used for experimental teaching in engineering education.

[1]  Christian Gütl,et al.  Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Gabriel Gorghiu,et al.  Web tools and instruments created in the VccSSe European project with the view to support Science teachers' experimental activities , 2011 .

[3]  Ingvar Gustavsson,et al.  Traditional Lab Sessions in a Remote Laboratory for Circuit Analysis , 2004 .

[4]  Lauri Nummenmaa,et al.  How undergraduate students meet a new learning environment? , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Luís Gomes,et al.  Current Trends in Remote Laboratories , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  S. Senthamarai Interactive teaching strategies , 2018 .

[7]  Thomas R. Koballa,et al.  The Spectrum of Scientific Literacy. , 1997 .

[8]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  America's lab report : investigations in high school science , 2006 .

[9]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Inserting the Presence of Mind into a Philosophy of Presence: A Response to Sheridan and Mantovani and Riva , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Antonio Vallejo Guevara,et al.  Remote and Real Time Laboratories Network for Engineering Education , 2013 .

[12]  Martyn Cooper,et al.  Remote controlled experiments for teaching over the internet: a comparision of approaches developed in the pearl project , 2002, ASCILITE.

[13]  Paul Franz Brandwein,et al.  The Teaching of science , 1962 .

[14]  María M. Larrondo-Petrie,et al.  Models of Collaborative Remote Laboratories and Integration with Learning Environments , 2016, Int. J. Online Eng..

[15]  Tobias Bjerregaard,et al.  A survey of research and practices of Network-on-chip , 2006, CSUR.

[16]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review , 2006, CSUR.

[17]  Glynis Perkin,et al.  Laboratories for the 21st century in STEM higher education: a compendium of current UK practice and an insight into future directions for laboratory-based teaching and learning , 2013 .

[18]  Ahmad Said Tolba,et al.  Educational Objectives Of Different Laboratory Types: A Comparative Study , 2009, ArXiv.

[19]  Ioana Ghergulescu,et al.  REVIEW OF VIRTUAL LABS AS THE EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR TEACHING STEM SUBJECTS , 2017 .

[20]  Diego Dotor,et al.  Virtual labs: A new tool in the education: Experience of Technical University of Madrid , 2016, 2016 13th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV).

[21]  James R. Brinson Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Richard E. Blanchard,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF A REMOTE LABORATORY FOR DISTANCE LEARNING AT LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY , 2013 .

[23]  John Patrick,et al.  Training: Research and practice. , 1992 .

[24]  M.E. Macias,et al.  TeleLab - remote automations lab in real time , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[25]  Martin Levesley,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Personalised Remote Experiments in an Engineering Degree , 2007, WEBIST.

[26]  Vesna Kirandziska,et al.  The importance of hands-on experiences in robotics courses , 2017, IEEE EUROCON 2017 -17th International Conference on Smart Technologies.

[27]  Albert J. Rosa,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education , 2005 .

[28]  M.E. Macias,et al.  Virtual 3D controllable machine models for implementation of automations laboratories , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[29]  Ruben Morales-Menendez,et al.  Technological innovations and practices in engineering education: a review , 2019, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM).

[30]  Carmen Gerigan,et al.  Simulated, hands-on and remote laboratories for studying the solar cells , 2015, 2015 Intl Aegean Conference on Electrical Machines & Power Electronics (ACEMP), 2015 Intl Conference on Optimization of Electrical & Electronic Equipment (OPTIM) & 2015 Intl Symposium on Advanced Electromechanical Motion Systems (ELECTROMOTION).

[31]  F. M. Schaf,et al.  Control and automation engineering education: Combining physical, remote and virtual labs , 2012, International Multi-Conference on Systems, Sygnals & Devices.

[32]  Gustavo Ribeiro Alves,et al.  Impact of a remote lab on teaching practices and student learning , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student laboratories , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .