Social Roles and Baseline Proxemic Preferences for a Domestic Service Robot

The goal of our research is to develop socially acceptable behavior for domestic robots in a setting where a user and the robot are sharing the same physical space and interact with each other in close proximity. Specifically, our research focuses on approach distances and directions in the context of a robot handing over an object to a user. Our present study consisted of two parts. Firstly, we carried out a large-scale survey trying to identify the internal structure between users’ different social role expectations and the relationships between these and users’ technology usage. Results from this study led to the development of a measure for preferred robot social roles. In the second part, this measure was used in a live human–robot interaction (HRI) study in a home setting, designed to create a baseline understanding of human–robot Proxemics approach directions and distances for a Care-O-bot$$^{\circledR }$$®3 based on these roles. In order to support users interpretation of the robots intentions in those tasks, the HRI studies used a simple LED light display panel. Findings indicate that, participants were comfortable with the robot approaching to the closest implemented distance (0.5 m). For the task requiring relatively more coordination, participants preferred the robot to approach from the front to a larger extent than for tasks requiring less coordination. The ability to identify the signals from the LED display also impacted how participants evaluated the robots behaviour. Users who had previous experience of interacting with robots differentiated less between approaches, and also evaluated tasks requiring more coordination with the robot more favourably. The findings in the short-term sample were strongly influenced by expectations as to the social role expectation they had of the robot, suggesting that social expectations impact proxemic interactions even if the robot platform is clearly not humanoid.

[1]  Rachid Alami,et al.  How may I serve you?: a robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context , 2006, HRI '06.

[2]  N. Sharkey,et al.  Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[3]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Robot to Human Approaches: Preliminary Results on Comfortable Distances and Preferences , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics.

[4]  Thomas Bak,et al.  Adaptive Human-Aware Robot Navigation in Close Proximity to Humans , 2011 .

[5]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Robotic etiquette: Results from user studies involving a fetch and carry task , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[7]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home , 2006, HRI '06.

[8]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Sharing Spaces with Robots in a Home Scenario - Anthropomorphic Attributions and their Effect on Proxemic Expectations and Evaluations in a Live HRI Trial , 2008, AAAI Fall Symposium: AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems.

[9]  Jeha Ryu,et al.  Safe physical human robot interaction-past, present and future , 2008 .

[10]  Steffen Steinert,et al.  The Five Robots—A Taxonomy for Roboethics , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[11]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  An atlas of physical human-robot interaction , 2008 .

[12]  Mattias Jacobsson,et al.  Play, belief and stories about robots: A case study of a pleo blogging community , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[13]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[14]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Care-O-bot 3 — Rationale for human-robot interaction design , 2008 .

[16]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Empirical results from using a comfort level device in human-robot interaction studies , 2006, HRI '06.

[17]  R. Cattell The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[18]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Living with Robots: Investigating the Habituation Effect in Participants' Preferences During a Longitudinal Human-Robot Interaction Study , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[19]  Rachid Alami,et al.  Exploratory Study of a Robot Approaching a Person in the Context of Handing Over an Object , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics.

[20]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[21]  Bruce Christianson,et al.  My Familiar Robot Companion: Preferences and Perceptions of CHARLY, a Companion Humanoid Autonomous Robot for Living with You , 2012, TAROS.

[22]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[23]  Rachid Alami,et al.  Navigation in the presence of humans , 2005, 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2005..

[24]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[25]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  A Robotic Weight Loss Coach , 2007, AAAI.

[26]  Marc Hanheide,et al.  Evaluating the Robot Personality and Verbal Behavior of Domestic Robots Using Video-Based Studies , 2011, Adv. Robotics.

[27]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  Hospital robot at work: something alien or an intelligent colleague? , 2012, CSCW.

[28]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Five Weeks in the Robot House – Exploratory Human-Robot Interaction Trials in a Domestic Setting , 2009, 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions.

[29]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Non-facial/non-verbal methods of affective expression as applied to robot-assisted victim assessment , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[30]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Human Mental Models of Humanoid Robots , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[31]  W MattiasJacobsson Play , Belief and Stories about Robots : A Case Study of a Pleo Blogging Community , .

[32]  L. Hayduk Personal space: Where we now stand. , 1983 .

[33]  Fumihide Tanaka,et al.  Daily HRI evaluation at a classroom environment: reports from dance interaction experiments , 2006, HRI '06.

[34]  A. Kendon Studies in the behavior of social interaction , 1977 .

[35]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Hey! There is someone at your door. A hearing robot using visual communication signals of hearing dogs to communicate intent , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life (ALife).

[36]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Title of paper : KASPAR – A Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot for Human-Robot Interaction Research , 2009 .

[37]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Android science: conscious and subconscious recognition , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[38]  Martin Hägele,et al.  Robot Assistants at Manual Workplaces: Effective Co-operation and Safety Aspects , 2002 .

[39]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  The Role of Autonomy and Interaction Type on Spatial Comfort in an HRI Scenario , 2008 .

[40]  H. Huttenrauch,et al.  Fetch-and-carry with CERO: observations from a long-term user study with a service robot , 2002, Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[41]  Alois Knoll,et al.  The roles of haptic-ostensive referring expressions in cooperative, task-based human-robot dialogue , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[42]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  An empirical framework for human-robot proxemics , 2009 .

[43]  Elena Torta,et al.  Design of a Parametric Model of Personal Space for Robotic Social Navigation , 2013, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[44]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[45]  Sharon L Crowell-Davis Motivation for pet ownership and its relevance to behavior problems. , 2008, Compendium.

[46]  Min Huaqing,et al.  Joint Conditional Random Field Filter for Multi-Object Tracking , 2011 .

[47]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  An Autonomous Proxemic System for a Mobile Companion Robot , 2010 .

[48]  Sonya S. Kwak,et al.  The impacts of intergroup relations and body zones on people's acceptance of a robot , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[49]  Ryoji Soyama,et al.  Selectable operating interfaces of the meal-assistance device My Spoon , 2004 .

[50]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Care-O-bot® 3 - Vision of a Robot Butler , 2013, Your Virtual Butler.

[51]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Hardware companions?: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship , 2003, CHI '03.

[52]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Social Effects of Robot Therapy in a Care House - Change of Social Network of the Residents for Two Months , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[53]  A. Billard,et al.  Effects of repeated exposure to a humanoid robot on children with autism , 2004 .

[54]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Video prototyping of dog-inspired non-verbal affective communication for an appearance constrained robot , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[55]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Domestic Robots for Older Adults: Attitudes, Preferences, and Potential , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[56]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[57]  I. René J. A. te Boekhorst,et al.  Human approach distances to a mechanical-looking robot with different robot voice styles , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[58]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Relationship between interaction with the mental commit robot and change of stress reaction of the elderly , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation for the New Millennium (Cat. No.03EX694).

[59]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PERSONAL SPACE EXPECTATIONS AND THEIR VIOLATIONS , 1976 .

[60]  Bruce Christianson,et al.  Exploring Robot Etiquette: Refining a HRI Home Companion Scenario Based on Feedback from Two Artists Who Lived with Robots in the UH Robot House , 2013, ICSR.

[61]  A. Green,et al.  Applying the Wizard-of-Oz framework to cooperative service discovery and configuration , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[62]  Jun-Hyeong Do,et al.  Intelligent Interaction For Human-Friendly Service Robot in Smart House Environment , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[63]  A. Kendon Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters , 1990 .

[64]  Sonya S. Kwak,et al.  Am I acceptable to you? Effect of a robot's verbal language forms on people's social distance from robots , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[65]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Pre-collision safety strategies for human-robot interaction , 2007, Auton. Robots.

[66]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[67]  Guido Herrmann,et al.  Towards Safety in Human Robot Interaction , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[68]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[69]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Talking about tactile experiences , 2013, CHI.