Recognition alters the spatial pattern of FMRI activation in early retinotopic cortex.

Early retinotopic cortex has traditionally been viewed as containing a veridical representation of the low-level properties of the image, not imbued by high-level interpretation and meaning. Yet several recent results indicate that neural representations in early retinotopic cortex reflect not just the sensory properties of the image, but also the perceived size and brightness of image regions. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging pattern analyses to ask whether the representation of an object in early retinotopic cortex changes when the object is recognized compared with when the same stimulus is presented but not recognized. Our data confirmed this hypothesis: the pattern of response in early retinotopic visual cortex to a two-tone "Mooney" image of an object was more similar to the response to the full grayscale photo version of the same image when observers knew what the two-tone image represented than when they did not. Further, in a second experiment, high-level interpretations actually overrode bottom-up stimulus information, such that the pattern of response in early retinotopic cortex to an identified two-tone image was more similar to the response to the photographic version of that stimulus than it was to the response to the identical two-tone image when it was not identified. Our findings are consistent with prior results indicating that perceived size and brightness affect representations in early retinotopic visual cortex and, further, show that even higher-level information--knowledge of object identity--also affects the representation of an object in early retinotopic cortex.

[1]  D Mumford,et al.  On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. , 1992, Biological cybernetics.

[2]  S Ullman,et al.  Sequence seeking and counter streams: a computational model for bidirectional information flow in the visual cortex. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  T. S. Lee,et al.  A Bayesian framework for understanding texture segmentation in the primary visual cortex , 1995, Vision Research.

[4]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context , 1997, Nature.

[6]  Sir G. Archaeopteryx.  Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey , 1998 .

[7]  J. M. Hupé,et al.  Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons , 1998, Nature.

[8]  R. Dolan,et al.  Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform gyrus , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  D. Heeger,et al.  Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[11]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[12]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[13]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Paul Schrater,et al.  Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  N. Rubin,et al.  fMRI Activation in Response to Illusory Contours and Salient Regions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2003, Neuron.

[17]  M. Bar.  A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  B. Fischer,et al.  Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[20]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  Guillaume Flandin,et al.  Retinotopic organization of visual mental images as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  D. Mumford.  On the computational architecture of the neocortex , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Jacob Jolij,et al.  Figure–ground segregation requires two distinct periods of activity in V1: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2005, Neuroreport.

[26]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Bayesian inference and attentional modulation in the visual cortex , 2005, Neuroreport.

[27]  E. Halgren,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  M. Bear,et al.  Reward Timing in the Primary Visual Cortex , 2006, Science.

[29]  D. Kersten,et al.  The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  D. Kersten,et al.  Responses to Lightness Variations in Early Human Visual Cortex , 2007, Current Biology.

[31]  Geoffrey M Boynton,et al.  The Representation of Behavioral Choice for Motion in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  F. Tong,et al.  The timing of perceptual decisions for ambiguous face stimuli in the human ventral visual cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[34]  Fang Fang,et al.  Perceptual grouping and inverse fMRI activity patterns in human visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[35]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Effective connectivity during haptic perception: A study using Granger causality analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data , 2008, NeuroImage.

[36]  W. Richards,et al.  Perception as Bayesian Inference , 2008 .

[37]  John T Serences,et al.  Value-Based Modulations in Human Visual Cortex , 2008, Neuron.

[38]  M. Paradiso,et al.  V1 response timing and surface filling-in. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  D. Kersten,et al.  Attention-Dependent Representation of a Size Illusion in Human V1 , 2008, Current Biology.

[40]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Feedback of pVisual Object Information to Foveal Retinotopic Cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  David E. J. Linden,et al.  Orientation-specific adaptation to mentally generated lines in human visual cortex , 2009, NeuroImage.

[42]  Edgar A. DeYoe,et al.  I know where you are secretly attending! The topography of human visual attention revealed with fMRI , 2009, Vision Research.

[43]  David Whitney,et al.  Attention Narrows Position Tuning of Population Responses in V1 , 2009, Current Biology.