A Flexible Dual Task Paradigm for Evaluating an Embodied Conversational Agent: Modality Effects and Reaction Time as an Index of Cognitive Load

A new experimental method based on the dual task paradigm is used to evaluate speech intelligibility of an embodied conversational agent (ECA). The experiment consists of the manipulation of auditory-visual (AV) versus auditory-only (A) presentation of speech. In the dual task, participants perform two tasks concurrently. The secondary task is sensitive to cognitive processing demands of the primary task. In the primary task participants either shadowed words or named the superordinate categories to which words belonged, as the word items were spoken by the ECA under A or AV conditions. Reaction time (RT) on the secondary task-swatting a fly on the ECA face-was affected by the difficulty of the concurrent task. The secondary RT was affected by modality of presentation of the primary task. Using a relatively primitive ECA, RT on the secondary task was significantly slower when shadowing occurred in AV versus A conditions. The benefits of this evaluation system, that returns quantitative behavioural data and self-report ratings, are discussed.

[1]  W. Johnston,et al.  Flexibility and capacity demands of attention , 1978 .

[2]  Gérard Bailly,et al.  Can you 'read' tongue movements? Evaluation of the contribution of tongue display to speech understanding , 2007, Speech Commun..

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[4]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. , 1998 .

[5]  Catherine J. Stevens,et al.  On-line experimental methods to evaluate text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis: effects of voice gender and signal quality on intelligibility, naturalness and preference , 2005, Comput. Speech Lang..

[6]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  A methodological assessment and evaluation of dual-task paradigms , 1986 .

[7]  Canan Karatekin,et al.  Attention allocation in the dual-task paradigm as measured through behavioral and psychophysiological responses. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Catherine Pelachaud,et al.  From brows to trust: evaluating embodied conversational agents , 2004 .

[9]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[10]  Jean-Claude Martin,et al.  Evaluation of Multimodal Behaviour of Embodied Agents , 2004, From Brows to Trust.

[11]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Validating the web-based evaluation of NLG systems , 2009, ACL/IJCNLP.

[12]  Gérard Bailly,et al.  Gaze, conversational agents and face-to-face communication , 2010, Speech Commun..

[13]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  A Conversational Agent as Museum Guide - Design and Evaluation of a Real-World Application , 2005, IVA.

[14]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[15]  Katherine Isbister,et al.  Design and Evaluation of Embodied Conversational Agents: A Proposed Taxonomy , 2002 .

[16]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  ECA as User Interface Paradigm , 2004, From Brows to Trust.