Exploring early adolescents’ evaluation of academic and commercial online resources related to health

Abstract This study assessed the ability of 426 students (ages 12–13) to critically evaluate two types of online locations on health issues: an academic resource and a commercial resource. The results indicated limited evaluation abilities, especially for the commercial resource, and only a small, partial association with prior stance and offline reading ability. Only about half (51.4%) of the students questioned the credibility of the commercial online resource and only about 19% of the students showed an ability to fully recognize commercial bias. Wide variation existed in students’ ability to evaluate online information, as approximately one-fourth of the students performed poorly when evaluating the overall credibility of both online resources and one-fourth performed well. Logistic regression models showed that offline reading skills accounted for only 8.8% of the variance for the academic online resource and 15.1% of that for the commercial resource. No association appeared between evaluation and background knowledge, although an association with prior stance was observed for each online resource. The results are discussed in light of previous research and the need to pay greater attention to the critical evaluation of online resources during classroom instruction.

[1]  C. Kinzer,et al.  New Literacies , 2018, Theoretical Models and Processes of Literacy.

[2]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  How attitude strength biases information processing and evaluation on the web , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Ivan K. Ash,et al.  Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks , 2009 .

[4]  Amy I. Nathanson,et al.  Children of the Net: An Empirical Exploration Into the Evaluation of Internet Content , 2006 .

[5]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of a complex cognitive skill , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  J. Eccles,et al.  The development of children ages 6 to 14. , 1999, The Future of children.

[7]  Eva Wennås Brante,et al.  Task-Oriented Learning with Multiple Documents: Effects of Topic Familiarity, Author Expertise, and Content Relevance on Document Selection, Processing, and Use. , 2018 .

[8]  Urs Gasser,et al.  Youth and Digital Media: From Credibility to Information Quality , 2012 .

[9]  Michelle K. Hosp,et al.  Oral Reading Fluency as an Indicator of Reading Competence: A Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Analysis , 2001 .

[10]  Ellen R. Tauber,et al.  How Do People Evaluate a Web Site's Credibility? , 2002 .

[11]  D. Brassart.  Does a prototypical argumentative schema exist? Text recall in 8 to 13 years olds , 1996 .

[12]  Douglas Walton,et al.  Bias, Critical Doubt, and Fallacies , 1991 .

[13]  D. Leu,et al.  The New Literacies of Online Research and Comprehension: Rethinking the Reading Achievement Gap , 2015 .

[14]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[15]  J. Klein,et al.  Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: the place of the internet. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[16]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Managing, Understanding, Applying, and Creating Knowledge in the Information Age: Next-Generation Challenges and Opportunities , 2013 .

[17]  Jason L. G. Braasch,et al.  Teaching Fourth and Fifth Graders to Evaluate Information Sources During Text Comprehension , 2013 .

[18]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Students Evaluating Internet Sources: From Versatile Evaluators to Uncritical Readers , 2008 .

[19]  Janet Morahan-Martin,et al.  How Internet Users Find, Evaluate, and Use Online Health Information: A Cross-Cultural Review , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  Rukhsana Ahmed,et al.  The effect of source credibility on consumers' perceptions of the quality of health information on the Internet , 2006, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[21]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Trust Matters: Examining the Role of Source Evaluation in Students' Construction of Meaning Within and Across Multiple Texts , 2009 .

[22]  Heikki Lyytinen,et al.  Literacy Skill Development of Children with Familial Risk for Dyslexia through Grades , 2014 .

[23]  Julie Coiro,et al.  Investigating Criteria That Seventh Graders Use to Evaluate the Quality of Online Information , 2015 .

[24]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[25]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Credibility and computing technology , 1999, CACM.

[26]  Julie Coiro,et al.  Talking About Reading as Thinking: Modeling the Hidden Complexities of Online Reading Comprehension , 2011 .

[27]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  Is This Information Source Commercially Biased? How Contradictions between Web Pages Stimulate the Consideration of Source Information. , 2016 .

[28]  Julie Coiro,et al.  Exploring the Online Reading Comprehension Strategies Used by Sixth-Grade Skilled Readers to Search for and Locate Information on the Internet. , 2007 .

[29]  R. Nickerson.  Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[30]  Bettina Fabos,et al.  The Price of Information Critical Literacy, Education, and Today’s Internet , 2008 .

[31]  D. Caulley.  Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods , 2007 .

[32]  R. Bogdan.  Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theory and methods / by Robert C. Bogdan and Sari Knopp Biklen , 1997 .

[33]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Spontaneous Sourcing Among Students Reading Multiple Documents , 2013 .

[34]  Julie Coiro,et al.  Predicting Reading Comprehension on the Internet , 2011 .

[35]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Whose story is this? Discrepancy triggers readers’ attention to source information in short narratives , 2016 .

[36]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Digital Media and Youth: Unparalleled Opportunity and Unprecedented Responsibility , 2008 .

[37]  Sandra C. Jones,et al.  Online Advertising: Examining the Content and Messages within Websites Targeted at Children , 2012 .

[38]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change , 2011 .

[39]  J. Rouet,et al.  The Impact of Presentation Format, Task Assignment, and Prior Knowledge on Students' Comprehension of Multiple Online Documents , 2007 .

[40]  Johannes Naumann,et al.  Effects of linear reading, basic computer skills, evaluating online information, and navigation on reading digital text , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .