Derivatives on Volatility: Some Simple Solutions Based on Observables

Proposals to introduce derivatives whose payouts are explicitly linked to the volatility of an underlying asset have been around for some time. In response to these proposals, a few papers have tried to develop valuation formulae for volatility derivatives ? derivatives that essentially help investors hedge the unpredictable volatility risk. This paper contributes to this nascent literature by developing closed-form/analytical formulae for prices of options and futures on volatility as well as volatility swaps. The primary contribution of this paper is that, unlike all other models, our model is empirically viable and can be easily implemented. More specifically, our model distinguishes itself from other proposed solutions/models in the following respects: (1) Although volatility is stochastic, it is an exact function of the observed path of asset prices. This is crucial in practice because nonobservability of volatility makes it very difficult, (in fact, impossible) to arrive at prices and hedge ratios of volatility derivatives in an internally consistent fashion, as it is akin to not knowing the stock price when trying to price an equity derivative. (2) The model does not require an unobserved volatility risk premium, nor is it predicated on the strong assumption of the existence of a continuum of options of all strikes and maturities as in some papers. (3) We show how it is possible to replicate (delta hedge) volatility derivatives by trading only in the underlying asset (on whose volatility the derivative exists) and a risk-free asset. This bypasses the problem of having to trade numerously many options on the underlying asset, a hedging strategy proposed in some other models.

[1]  S. Heston,et al.  A Closed-Form GARCH Option Valuation Model , 2000 .

[2]  S. Heston,et al.  A Closed-Form GARCH Option Valuation Model , 2000 .

[3]  P. Carr,et al.  Option Pricing, Interest Rates and Risk Management: Towards a Theory of Volatility Trading , 2001 .

[4]  Emanuel Derman,et al.  STOCHASTIC IMPLIED TREES: ARBITRAGE PRICING WITH STOCHASTIC TERM AND STRIKE STRUCTURE OF VOLATILITY , 1998 .

[5]  Douglas T. Breeden,et al.  Prices of State-Contingent Claims Implicit in Option Prices , 1978 .

[6]  J. Rosenberg Implied Volatility Functions , 2000 .

[7]  J. Ingersoll Theory of Financial Decision Making , 1987 .

[8]  F. Longstaff,et al.  Valuing Futures and Options on Volatility , 1996 .

[9]  Dan Galai,et al.  New Financial Instruments for Hedge Changes in Volatility , 1989 .

[10]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[11]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  R. Fisher The Advanced Theory of Statistics , 1943, Nature.

[13]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[14]  M. Rubinstein. Implied Binomial Trees , 1994 .

[15]  Feller William,et al.  An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications , 1950 .

[16]  S. Heston A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options , 1993 .

[17]  T. Bollerslev,et al.  Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity , 1986 .

[18]  J. Harrison,et al.  Martingales and stochastic integrals in the theory of continuous trading , 1981 .

[19]  Jaeho Cho A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates Under Non-expected Intertemporal Preferences , 1998 .

[20]  Jeff Fleming,et al.  Implied volatility functions: empirical tests , 1996, IEEE/IAFE 1996 Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr).