Different nonlinear functions in hippocampus and perirhinal cortex relating functional MRI activity to memory strength

Findings from functional MRI (fMRI) studies of recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe often suggest qualitative differences in the contribution of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex. This interpretation is complicated by the fact that most of the methods intended to demonstrate qualitative differences also separate strong memories from weak memories. Thus, apparent qualitative differences might reflect quantitative differences in how measured activity in medial temporal lobe structures varies with memory strength. We tested the hypothesis that the relationship between activity at the time of study and subsequent memory strength is nonlinear in hippocampus and perirhinal cortex and also distinctly different in those two structures. We found that activity in the hippocampus was characterized by a positively accelerated function and that activity in the perirhinal cortex was associated with a statistically different, negatively accelerated function. Our results do not count against the possibility that these structures differ qualitatively in their contributions to memory. Rather, our findings show how an alternative interpretation based on quantitative differences can also account for a good deal of data, and they suggest that a demonstration of qualitative differences requires more stringent criteria than are achieved in most fMRI studies.

[1]  R. Clark,et al.  Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Nikos K Logothetis,et al.  Interpreting the BOLD signal. , 2004, Annual review of physiology.

[3]  Rachel A. Diana,et al.  Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Daniel L Schacter,et al.  Amygdala Activity Is Associated with the Successful Encoding of Item, But Not Source, Information for Positive and Negative Stimuli , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Michael D Rugg,et al.  Encoding and the Durability of Episodic Memory: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  R. Clark,et al.  The medial temporal lobe. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  Malcolm W. Brown,et al.  Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  Jack L. Lancaster,et al.  Clustered pixels analysis for functional MRI activation studies of the human brain , 1995 .

[9]  Craig E. L. Stark,et al.  When zero is not zero: The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Search and decision processes in recognition memory. , 1974 .

[11]  Anders Winman,et al.  Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation , 1996 .

[12]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[13]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Putting names to faces: Successful encoding of associative memories activates the anterior hippocampal formation , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  John T Wixted,et al.  A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[18]  J. Dunn Remember-know: a matter of confidence. , 2004, Psychological review.

[19]  Sabrina M. Tom,et al.  Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Emery N Brown,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Activity during the Gradual Acquisition and Expression of Paired-Associate Memory , 2005 .

[21]  Yael Shrager,et al.  Activity in Both Hippocampus and Perirhinal Cortex Predicts the Memory Strength of Subsequently Remembered Information , 2008, Neuron.

[22]  Richard Henson,et al.  Forward inference using functional neuroimaging: dissociations versus associations , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[24]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[25]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Multiple routes to memory: Distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  J. Wixted,et al.  A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. , 2010, Psychological review.