Delayed Arterial Healing and Increased Late Stent Thrombosis at Culprit Sites After Drug-Eluting Stent Placement for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: An Autopsy Study

Background— The long-term safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains uncertain. Using autopsy data, we evaluated the pathological responses of the stented segment in patients treated with DES for AMI and compared with patients with stable angina. Methods and Results— From the CVPath Registry of 138 DES autopsies, we identified 25 patients who presented with AMI and had an underlying necrotic core with a ruptured fibrous cap. Twenty-six patients who had stable angina with thick-cap fibroatheroma treated by DES were selected as controls. Histomorphometric analysis was performed in patients with >30-day stent duration. We compared the response to stenting at the culprit site in these 2 groups and to nonculprit sites within each stent. Late stent thrombosis was significantly less frequent in stable (11%) than in AMI (41%; P=0.04) patients. Although neointimal thickness in the AMI culprit site was significantly less (median, 0.04 mm; interquartile range [IQR], 0.02 to 0.09 mm), the prevalence of uncovered struts (49%; IQR, 16% to 96%), fibrin deposition (63±28%), and inflammation (35%; IQR, 27% to 49%) were significantly greater compared with the culprit site in stable patients (neointimal thickness: 0.11 mm [IQR, 0.07 to 0.21 mm], P=0.008; uncovered struts: 9% [IQR, 0% to 39%], P=0.01; fibrin: 36±27%, P=0.008; inflammation, 17% [IQR, 7% to 25%], P=0.003) and the nonculprit site within each stent. Conclusions— Vessel healing at the culprit site in AMI patients treated with DES is substantially delayed compared with the culprit site in patients receiving DES for stable angina, emphasizing the importance of underlying plaque morphology in the arterial response to DES. Our data suggest an increased risk of thrombotic complications in patients treated with DES for AMI.

[1]  John Bresnahan,et al.  Outcomes of Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis During Extended Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Bare-Metal Coronary Stents , 2007, Circulation.

[2]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Meta-analysis of randomized trials on drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, European heart journal.

[3]  P. Steg Drug eluting stents should be used with caution in acute myocardial infarction , 2007 .

[4]  Michail I. Papafaklis,et al.  Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Michael Joner,et al.  Vascular Responses to Drug Eluting Stents: Importance of Delayed Healing , 2007, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[6]  R. Virmani,et al.  Pathological Correlates of Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis: Strut Coverage as a Marker of Endothelialization , 2007, Circulation.

[7]  Rolf Vogel,et al.  Incomplete Stent Apposition and Very Late Stent Thrombosis After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation , 2007, Circulation.

[8]  Johan Lindbäck,et al.  Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  A. Farb,et al.  Stent thrombosis redux--the FDA perspective. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  S. Pocock,et al.  Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Neville Kukreja,et al.  Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study , 2007, The Lancet.

[12]  E. Bramucci,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting versus uncoated stents in acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Paclitaxel-eluting versus uncoated stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Michael Joner,et al.  Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  I. Iakovou,et al.  Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. , 2005, JAMA.

[16]  E. Edelman,et al.  Thrombosis Modulates Arterial Drug Distribution for Drug-Eluting Stents , 2005, Circulation.

[17]  E. Edelman,et al.  Specific binding to intracellular proteins determines arterial transport properties for rapamycin and paclitaxel. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  S. Doggrell Sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery , 2004, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.

[19]  G. Stone,et al.  A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Renu Virmani,et al.  Pathological Mechanisms of Fatal Late Coronary Stent Thrombosis in Humans , 2003, Circulation.

[21]  Jeffrey W Moses,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Renu Virmani,et al.  Morphological Predictors of Restenosis After Coronary Stenting in Humans , 2002, Circulation.

[23]  R. Virmani,et al.  Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. , 2000, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[24]  R. Virmani,et al.  Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  P. Libby,et al.  Evidence for apoptosis in advanced human atheroma. Colocalization with interleukin-1 beta-converting enzyme. , 1995, The American journal of pathology.